Exo-metal
Well-known member
They snap bc they have a scarf joint or am I wrong. I would think a non scarf joint/one piece would solve it but I know it causes more waste and for a company that size it makes sense not to do it.
They snap bc they have a scarf joint or am I wrong. I would think a non scarf joint/one piece would solve it but I know it causes more waste and for a company that size it makes sense not to do it.
Snap is a reference to a broken headstock mentioned earlier by another member not tone related.I would think they'd be snappier because the longer scale length would mean more tension on the strings, so they'd transfer vibration and detail better.
Snap is a reference to a broken headstock mentioned earlier by another member not tone related.
I don't think his are really Gibsons though. They were a custom job from J.T. Riboloff. Axl footed the bill when he was in GnR.They did a 27" Buckethead LP as well.
Gibson made a run of them, I was considering buying one.I don't think his are really Gibsons though. They were a custom job from J.T. Riboloff. Axl footed the bill when he was in GnR.
Oh okay, I didn't know that. Where they baritones?Gibson made a run of them, I was considering buying one.
Buckethead had a baritone made by Gibson. They did a “standard” and a “studio.” Gibson did a separate run of Gibson studio baritones. They were in different colors and, notably, had a regular sized body. The buckethead had a slightly oversized body so the proportions looks right for the neck.Oh okay, I didn't know that. Where they baritones?
The story that I had heard about his baritones was that they were made by Riboloff at his shop when he was no longer working for Gibson.Buckethead had a baritone made by Gibson. They did a “standard” and a “studio.” Gibson did a separate run of Gibson studio baritones. They were in different colors and, notably, had a regular sized body. The buckethead had a slightly oversized body so the proportions looks right for the neck.
One of their flagship acoustics is 25.5" as well, and has been since long before Fender was a company.The lightest one at Sweetwater is 10lbs, and that's with 9 hole weight relief. Gibson really needs to find some "mahogany" that isn't ultra-dense mystery sapwood.
Gibson has always done long scales - L5s and Super 400s were always 25.5. Not offering it at least as an option on the flagship solidbody seems like an odd choice.
Gibson has been producing 25.5" scale guitars since the 1930s.*Predicts Fender will sue Gibson -
IDK if i could get my hand around my chunky 68 RI LPC neck if it were 25.5"
I say let Fender be Fender & Gibson be Gibson.
Tbt due to an injury to my hand I don't get on with 25.5" scale guitars as well anymore, so it's 24.75" for me. I refuse to play real short scale guitars like Mustangs and shit. It's way too cramped, and looks ridiculous on a 6' tall man. Maybe if I was half-hobbitAnybody here who is advocating for a 25.5" scale LP needs to unfriend me right now.![]()
I was playing the old ladys thinline tele after I got home from tonights gig. It sounds so good...but I gotta work so much harder bending on that longer scale.Tbt do to an injury to my hand I don't get on with 25.5" scale guitars as well anymore, so it's 24.75" for me. I refuse to play real short scale guitars like Mustangs and shit. It's way too cramped, and looks ridiculous on a 6' tall man. Maybe if I was half-hobbit
I started on and played a Strat for years, and am perfectly comfy on the 9.25" radius and 25.5" scale for bends and vibrato. That's with 10-46 strings in E std.I was playing the old ladys thinline tele after I got home from tonights gig. It sounds so good...but I gotta work so much harder bending on that longer scale.