
Nigel Tufnel
New member
Oh I also recently read a great article by the original founder of greenpeace saying how inaccurate and full of shit "The 11th Hour" is. Isn't that another one of Al's pet projects?
cloudnine":197ec said:And I've still yet to see a seriously compelling argument otherwise, aside from a bunch of people yelling BAD SCIENCE BAD SCIENCE.
dicky sofa":84904 said:Al Gore is still 1,000,000,000 times better than the current administration...
![]()
Thats what Im saying!cloudnine":bdcdf said:What the fuck is up with people hating on Al lately?
Telephant":1d5ed said:Thats what Im saying!cloudnine":1d5ed said:What the fuck is up with people hating on Al lately?![]()
![]()
Has anyone here actually seen An Inconvenient Truth?
ejecta":12c06 said:Listen Al Gore cherry pick his "facts" does everything for HIS political gain just like 90% those fuckers on Capitol Hill.
The only people talking the truth in politics these days is Ron Paul and Mike Gravel. Do yourself a favor and look thos guys up and read about what they have to say. You hear whats really going on.
Quote from article...."The human impact on the atmosphere is simply too small to have a major effect on global temperatures," Dr Gray said.ejecta":b8eb9 said:Telephant":b8eb9 said:Thats what Im saying!cloudnine":b8eb9 said:What the fuck is up with people hating on Al lately?![]()
![]()
Has anyone here actually seen An Inconvenient Truth?
Yep I sure did then I did my own research and come up with stuff like this from people who dont have a political dog in the race.
http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/
psychodave":1dd1d said:So is the American press. They are afraid to report this story....
http://www.smh.com.au/news/environment/ ... 38792.html
cloudnine":f3864 said:He put his info out there in a way that was well presented and well argued.
ejecta":dc51d said:cloudnine":dc51d said:So basically you said absolutely nothing about what I said and just called me "Jr" to make yourself feel better.
I didnt say anything because the post above mine that Nigel wrote proved your boy Al to be full of shit. Listen Im from Tennessee and lived under that dumb ass and you think he's a good guy because you feed yourself all the info about him that the media feeds you and you suck up all the stuff you already agree with....... go on living in your dream world.
Nigel Tufnel":c9bf7 said:ejecta":c9bf7 said:Listen Al Gore cherry pick his "facts" does everything for HIS political gain just like 90% those fuckers on Capitol Hill.
The only people talking the truth in politics these days is Ron Paul and Mike Gravel. Do yourself a favor and look thos guys up and read about what they have to say. You hear whats really going on.
I'm a registered independent and I want to see a true 3rd party so badly
ejecta":b7d64 said:cloudnine":b7d64 said:And I've still yet to see a seriously compelling argument otherwise, aside from a bunch of people yelling BAD SCIENCE BAD SCIENCE.
Want facts?
If you would read even articles published in your own country like the one by C.R. de Freitas of the School of Geography and Environmental Science at the University of Auckland in New Zealand, which was published in the June 2002 issue of the Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology. Its focus is the ongoing rise in the air's CO2 content and what the consequences of that phenomenon might be for earth's climate and biosphere.
Fallacy 1: Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is increasing at alarming rates. It just ain't so, according to de Freitas, who notes that annual CO2 concentration increases appear to be leveling off in recent years. He also wonders what is alarming about the aerial fertilization effect of atmospheric CO2 enrichment, which dramatically stimulates the growth rates and enhances the water use efficiencies of essentially all of earth's plants.
Fallacy 2: Humans are big players in the global carbon cycle. In reality, says de Freitas, "anthropogenic CO2 emissions are only about 3% of the natural carbon cycle and less than 1% of the atmospheric reservoir of carbon." He also notes that the increase in the air's CO2 content over the past few centuries could well have been the result of earth's oceans giving off the gas in response to the planet's recovery from the Little Ice Age.
Fallacy 3: There is a close relationship between changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide and global temperature. De Freitas debunks the implied message of this myth, i.e., that it is changes in CO2 that drive changes in temperature, by citing many well-documented cases where just the opposite occurred, over periods ranging from months to millennia, reminding us that correlation does not prove causation and that cause must precede effect.
Ive got about 11 more if you want more than just BAD SCIENCE.
Variable":24ddd said:Nigel Tufnel":24ddd said:ejecta":24ddd said:Listen Al Gore cherry pick his "facts" does everything for HIS political gain just like 90% those fuckers on Capitol Hill.
The only people talking the truth in politics these days is Ron Paul and Mike Gravel. Do yourself a favor and look thos guys up and read about what they have to say. You hear whats really going on.
I'm a registered independent and I want to see a true 3rd party so badly
As a registered independent, I would think you'd want to see no political parties. So people vote on the issues instead of the party-line?