T
TrueTone500
Banned
New member
Let's say you decided to sell your tube amplifiers in favor of a simulation rig. Which would you choose: AxeFx II or Kemper?
I found one Axe vs Kemper clip. I thought the AxeFx sounded better - but clips are that way...clark81":1tmcz1ce said:here we go again...
for me it is the Axe fx II, i tried many times the Kemper but it doesnt feel right to my hands...
BUT
When i listen on youtube I am always impressed...
What do you think??
Yeh I think I watched the same clip. Axe was beating out the Kemper overall. But I think it was in the settings.TrueTone500":rf413fdc said:I found one Axe vs Kemper clip. I thought the AxeFx sounded better - but clips are that way...
It think the appearance of the Kemper may be throwing me off a bit? To me it looks like a suitcase.Audioholic":2gjty29o said:Both are great. Kemper was better for awhile and fractal really stepped up to improve their sound. Axe always had this high end artificial thing I just never jived with where Kemper was more raw and sounded right to me. Kind of a toss up now I just still prefer Kemper layout and workflow for me so if I had to choose today still would be Kemper
So what happens if I 'profile' my amp, but want to then back-off on the preamp gain. How does the Kemper duplicate the sound of my tube amp if I haven't profiled it using the revised setting? Do I have to make multiple profiles at various settings? How does the Kemper know what my amp sounds like at lower preamp settings?VESmedic":aryq39sq said:I think its unfair to compare to the kemper to the axe for a number of reasons, but one that alot of people forget: WHAT YOU PUT IN IS WHAT YOU GET OUT. The problem with profiling is not that, "hey im doing everything to profile it correctly, but the kemper can't capture it". That is not the case. If the profile doesn't come out well, YOU didn't do something right to profile your amp. Basically, garbage in, garbage out. If the profile sounds like garbage, it's more than likely user error, not the fault of the kemper, and this is something to remember when thinking about the kemper vs axe thing. The opposite is also 100 percent true. If the profile sounds great, accurate to the amp, feel etc, the profiling setup was probably done right on the user end. The kemper catches it all: beauty, or garbage.
As far as me and my needs, the kemper would be my choice, no question.
TrueTone500":3ququ1pe said:So what happens if I 'profile' my amp, but want to then back-off on the preamp gain. How does the Kemper duplicate the sound of my tube amp if I haven't profiled it using the revised setting? Do I have to make multiple profiles at various settings? How does the Kemper know what my amp sounds like at lower preamp settings?VESmedic":3ququ1pe said:I think its unfair to compare to the kemper to the axe for a number of reasons, but one that alot of people forget: WHAT YOU PUT IN IS WHAT YOU GET OUT. The problem with profiling is not that, "hey im doing everything to profile it correctly, but the kemper can't capture it". That is not the case. If the profile doesn't come out well, YOU didn't do something right to profile your amp. Basically, garbage in, garbage out. If the profile sounds like garbage, it's more than likely user error, not the fault of the kemper, and this is something to remember when thinking about the kemper vs axe thing. The opposite is also 100 percent true. If the profile sounds great, accurate to the amp, feel etc, the profiling setup was probably done right on the user end. The kemper catches it all: beauty, or garbage.
As far as me and my needs, the kemper would be my choice, no question.
A different beast compared to the AxeFx then. The Kemper would be perfect for profiling vintage amplifiers that you would never take on the road. In theory anyway...Audioholic":1wcwdk7b said:TrueTone500":1wcwdk7b said:So what happens if I 'profile' my amp, but want to then back-off on the preamp gain. How does the Kemper duplicate the sound of my tube amp if I haven't profiled it using the revised setting? Do I have to make multiple profiles at various settings? How does the Kemper know what my amp sounds like at lower preamp settings?VESmedic":1wcwdk7b said:I think its unfair to compare to the kemper to the axe for a number of reasons, but one that alot of people forget: WHAT YOU PUT IN IS WHAT YOU GET OUT. The problem with profiling is not that, "hey im doing everything to profile it correctly, but the kemper can't capture it". That is not the case. If the profile doesn't come out well, YOU didn't do something right to profile your amp. Basically, garbage in, garbage out. If the profile sounds like garbage, it's more than likely user error, not the fault of the kemper, and this is something to remember when thinking about the kemper vs axe thing. The opposite is also 100 percent true. If the profile sounds great, accurate to the amp, feel etc, the profiling setup was probably done right on the user end. The kemper catches it all: beauty, or garbage.
As far as me and my needs, the kemper would be my choice, no question.
The kemper has a gain knob, you can add or subtract, sounds very good to me. When profiling, their is a dynamic to the signal, which I believe is helping capture various levels and ranges. While the gain past a few clicks probably isn't replicating exactly what your amp would do, and it would be best to profile a few gain settings, still I find the gain knob very workable and sounds good to me.
rocknrolla":1rv8lk6a said:This thread is a parody of itself.
rocknrolla":3vpfadm0 said:This thread is a parody of itself.