Bugera TriRec Vs. Mesa Dual Recto (Video)

  • Thread starter Thread starter fluff191
  • Start date Start date
Shiny_Surface":1095shdy said:
While not a perfect analogy it's a valid comparison imo. Cosmetically similar with some tweaks and circuit design differences priced for a specific target market. Marshall issued a cease and desist for the Marsha for cosmetic appearance similarity if I recall. Which is a great amp imo. :lol: :LOL:

I agree with Blackba's post above it's ok to be biased and/or support a double standard. We are all hypocrites to some degree on any particular topic in life. :lol: :LOL:

Mostly the Bugera's bug me because I value innovation. I try to go out of my way to support innovative companies and avoid buying from those that just rehash other people's ideas.

I don't actually give a shit about the whole Chinese made thing. If they designed and built their own amps then shipped them over here they'd be competing with their own designs and I'd be indifferent towards it. But when they're taking other companies designs, building them overseas and shipping them in with the intent on marketing them as a cheap alternative to the real thing it bugs me.

I don't think it's any secret that the Recto was built off the SLO and the Ubershall was built off the Recto. All three amps sound different, look different, and each company attempted to innovate new design ideas instead of making a straight up clone. People don't say to themselves, "I want a SLO, but I'm just going to buy a Recto because it has the same sound and costs less than half the price."

It's the same with the Splawn shown above.
 
guitarmike":1ee7ugdm said:
TheMagicEight":1ee7ugdm said:
borninwinter":1ee7ugdm said:
300 billion in a drop in the bucket as far as US-China goes, really.
:confused:

Go on....
:no: I'd like 1/2 of that drop in the bucket. We all agree that any 1 person making 1 purchase does not impact much of anything in the nation's economy. The point is for many reasons that are not in the USA's best interest, we off shored most of our manufacturing base and all of the middle class jobs that were associated to them. If you are under 50 or have kids you'd better start caring....unless you like living in poverty.

Well I am under 50 and I do have a kid. Not sure where the idea that I don't care came from, or that I'm talking about 1 person buying 1 amp. What I'm saying is all the guitarists in the world making purchasing only American amps still wouldn't impact the overall economy in any meaningful way. The US owes China over $1 trillion right now, there's like a $300 billion per year trade imbalance. Those numbers are larger than the entire amp industry by far (and this is what the drop in the bucket thing was referring to). I think it's bad news for this country in the long term, but I'm not going to try to make myself feel better about by pretending my choice of buying Mesa, or Chevy, or whatever actually means anything at this point given those numbers. Caring/not caring, being optimistic/defeatist doesn't have anything to do with it, it's just reality.

What does matter in terms of US manufacturing is cost of labor. Unless you find a large number of Americans that are willing to work in manufacturing for what people in Asia are (I don't know of many), we can't compete and manufacturing isn't coming back to this country on a large scale. This is the key and it has nothing to do with anyone's choice of American vs foreign at the store.

You don't necessarily have to have manufacturing to be a successful economy, but in addition to making it really expensive to manufacture here, we've also decided that the government should spend a couple trillion more than we have every year. This pretty much means taxes are going up and up in the future and less money in the economy for business growth and jobs. IMO, this is also the wrong way to go. But buying American isn't going to address that issue either.

If anyone has some viable ideas about actually lowering the cost of US manufacturing or of getting the spending, which leads to the borrowing, under control, I'd be happy to support those.
 
some dude":1xvau1re said:
Shiny_Surface":1xvau1re said:
While not a perfect analogy it's a valid comparison imo. Cosmetically similar with some tweaks and circuit design differences priced for a specific target market. Marshall issued a cease and desist for the Marsha for cosmetic appearance similarity if I recall. Which is a great amp imo. :lol: :LOL:

I agree with Blackba's post above it's ok to be biased and/or support a double standard. We are all hypocrites to some degree on any particular topic in life. :lol: :LOL:

Mostly the Bugera's bug me because I value innovation. I try to go out of my way to support innovative companies and avoid buying from those that just rehash other people's ideas.

I don't actually give a shit about the whole Chinese made thing. If they designed and built their own amps then shipped them over here they'd be competing with their own designs and I'd be indifferent towards it. But when they're taking other companies designs, building them overseas and shipping them in with the intent on marketing them as a cheap alternative to the real thing it bugs me.

I don't think it's any secret that the Recto was built off the SLO and the Ubershall was built off the Recto. All three amps sound different, look different, and each company attempted to innovate new design ideas instead of making a straight up clone. People don't say to themselves, "I want a SLO, but I'm just going to buy a Recto because it has the same sound and costs less than half the price."

It's the same with the Splawn shown above.

Not sure why finding a way to produce a similar product for a grand less doesn't count as innovation, even if the product design itself isn't innovative....but yes, I get what you're saying here about rewarding actual creativity and don't necessarily disagree personally. Just think there's room for entry-level alternatives too. You can't get bold innovative design at entry level prices unfortunately.
 
e31.jpg
 
borninwinter":251kd1ke said:
Well I am under 50 and I do have a kid. Not sure where the idea that I don't care came from, or that I'm talking about 1 person buying 1 amp. What I'm saying is all the guitarists in the world making purchasing only American amps still wouldn't impact the overall economy in any meaningful way. The US owes China over $1 trillion right now, there's like a $300 billion per year trade imbalance. Those numbers are larger than the entire amp industry by far (and this is what the drop in the bucket thing was referring to). I think it's bad news for this country in the long term, but I'm not going to try to make myself feel better about by pretending my choice of buying Mesa, or Chevy, or whatever actually means anything at this point given those numbers. Caring/not caring, being optimistic/defeatist doesn't have anything to do with it, it's just reality.
It's not about feeling better about yourself, it's about not digging deeper into the hole we're in. And it's all purchase, not just amplifiers. Taken by itself - and the same can be said for most industries - the amp industry is insignificant. But everything adds up. And if 10 people decide to buy American products instead of Chinese, where possible, then maybe 1 - 2 more Americans will keep their job through the course of a year.

Everything adds up. Buying American isn't just about a trade imbalance or national deficit, it's about - for me - 1) investing in quality and 2) helping my neighbors.

borninwinter":251kd1ke said:
What does matter in terms of US manufacturing is cost of labor. Unless you find a large number of Americans that are willing to work in manufacturing for what people in Asia are (I don't know of many), we can't compete and manufacturing isn't coming back to this country on a large scale. This is the key and it has nothing to do with anyone's choice of American vs foreign at the store.
Henry Ford paid his workers an unprecedented $5 / day for unskilled labor. Why? So his workers would turn around and buy his cars. I don't need to remind you that it worked.

And it has everything to do with people's choices at the store. How? If some other company came in, stole Ford's design, manufactured it with cheap labor and sold it for half the price, Ford would have gone out of business if his workers and the public bought this competitor's cars. That exact thing is what caused manufacturing to move to Asia. Only we don't have the jobs to replace these American ex-factory workers, so all we've accomplished is fiscal suicide.

borninwinter":251kd1ke said:
You don't necessarily have to have manufacturing to be a successful economy, but in addition to making it really expensive to manufacture here, we've also decided that the government should spend a couple trillion more than we have every year.
You're totally correct that we theoretically don't need physical manufacturing to be successful. But then we need to produce something else. Great designs or ideas, businesses, etc., and that's something we're simply not doing right now.

Why is manufacturing here so expensive? Because of environmental regulations and policies in place to treat workers fairly (similar, if not stricter, policies are in place in the EU). Have you read first hand accounts from China? Have you seen a Chinese person come here, amazed at how clean the air is? That's not an accident. That's the cost of manufacturing, and to do otherwise is cheating. Industrial parks in China are disgusting, cities are filled with pollution, and factory workers' well being there is terrible. I'm not going to support that. I think it's a form of slow torture.

borninwinter":251kd1ke said:
If anyone has some viable ideas about actually lowering the cost of US manufacturing or of getting the spending, which leads to the borrowing, under control, I'd be happy to support those.
I don't think anything is going to change from the current path we're on until something comes to a head. Pessimistic, I know, but I don't think people in America can avoid the temptation of cheap products with the mindset that "they are insignificant and don't matter".

But I don't think the outlook is so bleak for people willing to work hard. I'm in school for engineering. I'm actually a little older, having started school working towards an audio degree. I changed my mind after working for a reputable audio equipment manufacturer (in America!) and seeing first hand what the workforce and manufacturing industry is really like. Granted, I like engineering anyway, but that convinced me to actually study it.

Point is, the people around me now aren't in constant worry. The job market for science and engineering majors isn't too bad at all, especially worldwide. If you're halfway good at it, you will probably never struggle with money. And so my support goes to leading education in the direction of math, science, technology and other promising careers that will make a difference.

If we can't (or won't) manufacture goods, that means we're importing. It also means - if we don't want a deficit - we need to export. And if we're not manufacturing products, we need to export ideas and services. I know insurance is big right now, for example. But we're not doing enough because foreigners - the Chinese in particular - don't want or need enough of what we offer. And until and unless they do, my choice is to buy made in USA.
 
TheMagicEight":6z9otaxw said:
borninwinter":6z9otaxw said:
Well I am under 50 and I do have a kid. Not sure where the idea that I don't care came from, or that I'm talking about 1 person buying 1 amp. What I'm saying is all the guitarists in the world making purchasing only American amps still wouldn't impact the overall economy in any meaningful way. The US owes China over $1 trillion right now, there's like a $300 billion per year trade imbalance. Those numbers are larger than the entire amp industry by far (and this is what the drop in the bucket thing was referring to). I think it's bad news for this country in the long term, but I'm not going to try to make myself feel better about by pretending my choice of buying Mesa, or Chevy, or whatever actually means anything at this point given those numbers. Caring/not caring, being optimistic/defeatist doesn't have anything to do with it, it's just reality.
It's not about feeling better about yourself, it's about not digging deeper into the hole we're in. And it's all purchase, not just amplifiers. Taken by itself - and the same can be said for most industries - the amp industry is insignificant. But everything adds up. And if 10 people decide to buy American products instead of Chinese, where possible, then maybe 1 - 2 more Americans will keep their job through the course of a year.

Everything adds up. Buying American isn't just about a trade imbalance or national deficit, it's about - for me - 1) investing in quality and 2) helping my neighbors.

borninwinter":6z9otaxw said:
What does matter in terms of US manufacturing is cost of labor. Unless you find a large number of Americans that are willing to work in manufacturing for what people in Asia are (I don't know of many), we can't compete and manufacturing isn't coming back to this country on a large scale. This is the key and it has nothing to do with anyone's choice of American vs foreign at the store.
Henry Ford paid his workers an unprecedented $5 / day for unskilled labor. Why? So his workers would turn around and buy his cars. I don't need to remind you that it worked.

And it has everything to do with people's choices at the store. How? If some other company came in, stole Ford's design, manufactured it with cheap labor and sold it for half the price, Ford would have gone out of business if his workers and the public bought this competitor's cars. That exact thing is what caused manufacturing to move to Asia. Only we don't have the jobs to replace these American ex-factory workers, so all we've accomplished is fiscal suicide.

borninwinter":6z9otaxw said:
You don't necessarily have to have manufacturing to be a successful economy, but in addition to making it really expensive to manufacture here, we've also decided that the government should spend a couple trillion more than we have every year.
You're totally correct that we theoretically don't need physical manufacturing to be successful. But then we need to produce something else. Great designs or ideas, businesses, etc., and that's something we're simply not doing right now.

Why is manufacturing here so expensive? Because of environmental regulations and policies in place to treat workers fairly (similar, if not stricter, policies are in place in the EU). Have you read first hand accounts from China? Have you seen a Chinese person come here, amazed at how clean the air is? That's not an accident. That's the cost of manufacturing, and to do otherwise is cheating. Industrial parks in China are disgusting, cities are filled with pollution, and factory workers' well being there is terrible. I'm not going to support that. I think it's a form of slow torture.

borninwinter":6z9otaxw said:
If anyone has some viable ideas about actually lowering the cost of US manufacturing or of getting the spending, which leads to the borrowing, under control, I'd be happy to support those.
I don't think anything is going to change from the current path we're on until something comes to a head. Pessimistic, I know, but I don't think people in America can avoid the temptation of cheap products with the mindset that "they are insignificant and don't matter".

But I don't think the outlook is so bleak for people willing to work hard. I'm in school for engineering. I'm actually a little older, having started school working towards an audio degree. I changed my mind after working for a reputable audio equipment manufacturer (in America!) and seeing first hand what the workforce and manufacturing industry is really like. Granted, I like engineering anyway, but that convinced me to actually study it.

Point is, the people around me now aren't in constant worry. The job market for science and engineering majors isn't too bad at all, especially worldwide. If you're halfway good at it, you will probably never struggle with money. And so my support goes to leading education in the direction of math, science, technology and other promising careers that will make a difference.

If we can't (or won't) manufacture goods, that means we're importing. It also means - if we don't want a deficit - we need to export. And if we're not manufacturing products, we need to export ideas and services. I know insurance is big right now, for example. But we're not doing enough because foreigners - the Chinese in particular - don't want or need enough of what we offer. And until and unless they do, my choice is to buy made in USA.
Bugera: Ruining America One Amp At A Time
 
Hi Guys,

My name is Joe Sanborn from BUGERA/MUSIC Group.

Please allow me to correct a few statements made here.

BUGERA has been around now for over 5 years and we are very proud that it has become a leading tube amp brand.

In fact, BUGERA is now the number one selling tube amp brand in Europe, based on Thomann who is Europe’s largest retailer.
https://www.thomann.de/gb/tube_guitar_combos.html

The V22 is selling so well, that it has become the top selling guitar amp overall.
https://www.thomann.de/gb/amplifiers_for ... itars.html

In the US, the V22 and V5 are Guitar Center’s top selling tube amp models.

Many of the stories are more fiction than facts and we are happy to discuss any questions you may have.

All BUGERA amps enjoy a 3-Year Warranty Program and we also have our own Care center and service parts depot in Las Vegas, in case help is ever needed.

Hope this helps.

Joe Sanborn
Manager, Channel Marketing
MUSIC Group
BUGERA
 
Thing is you can buy a used recto for $800 to $1000. I would personally save my money and do that as opposed to buying the other product. They are a tried and true product. But I'm sure for someone who can't afford it, after a while the Bugera's will be on the used market very cheap.

As someone said earlier, don't like it, don't buy it. People copy designs all the time once patents expire. Look at the drug industry. Companies are licking their chops waiting for patents to expire. And, then you come on a forum like this and it's a whole different story when someone copies someone's design. Which in he amp industry, there's really not much new and innovative. They are spinoffs of something else. And realize this happens every day in a lot of other industries that we don't pay close attention to. Again, if you don't like it, don't buy it.
 
Joe Sanborn":34ulr8vt said:
Hi Guys,

My name is Joe Sanborn from BUGERA/MUSIC Group.

Please allow me to correct a few statements made here.

BUGERA has been around now for over 5 years and we are very proud that it has become a leading tube amp brand.

In fact, BUGERA is now the number one selling tube amp brand in Europe, based on Thomann who is Europe’s largest retailer.
https://www.thomann.de/gb/tube_guitar_combos.html

The V22 is selling so well, that it has become the top selling guitar amp overall.
https://www.thomann.de/gb/amplifiers_for ... itars.html

In the US, the V22 and V5 are Guitar Center’s top selling tube amp models.

Many of the stories are more fiction than facts and we are happy to discuss any questions you may have.

All BUGERA amps enjoy a 3-Year Warranty Program and we also have our own Care center and service parts depot in Las Vegas, in case help is ever needed.

Hope this helps.

Joe Sanborn
Manager, Channel Marketing
MUSIC Group
BUGERA

Is the TriRec built from a Mesa Rectifier schematic? Are they similar?
Is the Magician built from a Mesa Mark schematic? Are they similar?
 
Schaf":188ygg5a said:
As someone said earlier, don't like it, don't buy it. People copy designs all the time once patents expire. Look at the drug industry. Companies are licking their chops waiting for patents to expire. And, then you come on a forum like this and it's a whole different story when someone copies someone's design. Which in he amp industry, there's really not much new and innovative. They are spinoffs of something else. And realize this happens every day in a lot of other industries that we don't pay close attention to. Again, if you don't like it, don't buy it.

Quoting for truth.

I cannot wait for the Trirec to come out and compare against my Road King II. If my 333XL's soncc performance compared to my XXX's is any indication, I bet the Tri-Rec won't disappoint.

Will it have the build quality? No. Do I expect that? No, it is a made in China for a slave's wages special. Will the Tri-Rec cut into Mesa's sales? No, a Aalue based company rarely ever cuts into a Name company's sales as their target groups are far different.

Now the folks looking to unload their used gear, they're going to feel a bite as someone who has only $800 to spend would most likely look at factory new with a warranty as compared to many years past warranty and many years exploited used gear. I would.

The quasi-political brand snobbery is humorous, really guys where is your TV, smart phone, computer, table, microwave, or blu-ray made? I'm betting not Poughkeepsie NY. I'm SURE all the brand snobs only drive Mercedes too, as the modern car can be traced back to the Mercedes... and it is only right to drive the original. Right guys?

The myopia and duplicity kill me.

Derek
 
Hi guys,
 
Thanks for the questions.
Please allow me to respond.
 
BUGERA never got sued by anyone.
 
We didn’t use anyone’s schematic. Of course, we look at other amps and have literally hundreds of amps in our studio, so we can test them against the most expensive amps available. However, as you can easily see, the TRIREC features our proprietary Infinium Tube Life Multiplier and Varipower technologies which you cannot find on any other amp. The TRIREC also comes with Midi and Reverb built in, which is different from the amp referred to in your posts.
 
Nowadays, most commercially available amps are made in China or Korea. In fact, it is a bit of a myth when people say "Made in the US" etc., as basically all electronic components come from China. So why would an amp sound different if it is built by Asian or Western hands or machines? For example, tubes are only made in China, Russia, and Yugoslavia, even though they carry lots of boutique labels.
 
The conversation about quality is an interesting one. When you build products in such high quantities such as BUGERA with extremely low margins, you have to watch the quality of your components even more as the slightest problem can wipe out all your profit. This is the reason why we own our factory and don’t leave manufacturing to any third party that does not care as much as we do about quality. And that’s also why we now offer a 3-Year Warranty Program for each amp.
 
Our failure rate is one of the lowest in the industry and please don’t take our word for it, but talk to anyone who sells our amps such as Guitar Center etc.
 
As usual, tubes are the most fragile component. No matter how well you test them (and we do test them extremely well), transportation and handling can often damage them. If there are any amp defects, 95% are related to tubes and that’s why we invented the Infinium technology, which constantly monitors tubes, adjusts their bias so they run in the optimal mode, and Infinium tells you when they need to replace a tube. You don’t need to buy a matched quartet anymore and you can just plug in ANY tube that fits. You can mix and match EL34, 6L6 and create great new sounds.
Also, Infinium can shut down an individual tube if it’s defective without shutting down your amp which is great when you are playing on stage, so your show goes on.
 
I am quite pleased to say, that BUGERA has invested a lot in R&D and new technologies which you can see here. And yes, I am American and like many of us here in the US or Germany, I got a job because of BUGERA. And I am proud of the tone amps like the TRIREC are achieving.

Joe Sanborn
Manager, Channel Marketing
MUSIC Group
BUGERA
 
Joe Sanborn":1gaju8gh said:
Hi guys,
 
Thanks for the questions.
Please allow me to respond.
 
BUGERA never got sued by anyone.
 
We didn’t use anyone’s schematic. Of course, we look at other amps and have literally hundreds of amps in our studio, so we can test them against the most expensive amps available. However, as you can easily see, the TRIREC features our proprietary Infinium Tube Life Multiplier and Varipower technologies which you cannot find on any other amp. The TRIREC also comes with Midi and Reverb built in, which is different from the amp referred to in your posts.
 
Nowadays, most commercially available amps are made in China or Korea. In fact, it is a bit of a myth when people say "Made in the US" etc., as basically all electronic components come from China. So why would an amp sound different if it is built by Asian or Western hands or machines? For example, tubes are only made in China, Russia, and Yugoslavia, even though they carry lots of boutique labels.
 
The conversation about quality is an interesting one. When you build products in such high quantities such as BUGERA with extremely low margins, you have to watch the quality of your components even more as the slightest problem can wipe out all your profit. This is the reason why we own our factory and don’t leave manufacturing to any third party that does not care as much as we do about quality. And that’s also why we now offer a 3-Year Warranty Program for each amp.
 
Our failure rate is one of the lowest in the industry and please don’t take our word for it, but talk to anyone who sells our amps such as Guitar Center etc.
 
As usual, tubes are the most fragile component. No matter how well you test them (and we do test them extremely well), transportation and handling can often damage them. If there are any amp defects, 95% are related to tubes and that’s why we invented the Infinium technology, which constantly monitors tubes, adjusts their bias so they run in the optimal mode, and Infinium tells you when they need to replace a tube. You don’t need to buy a matched quartet anymore and you can just plug in ANY tube that fits. You can mix and match EL34, 6L6 and create great new sounds.
Also, Infinium can shut down an individual tube if it’s defective without shutting down your amp which is great when you are playing on stage, so your show goes on.
 
I am quite pleased to say, that BUGERA has invested a lot in R&D and new technologies which you can see here. And yes, I am American and like many of us here in the US or Germany, I got a job because of BUGERA. And I am proud of the tone amps like the TRIREC are achieving.

Joe Sanborn
Manager, Channel Marketing
MUSIC Group
BUGERA



Really, you must be new there.

This is RigTalk your talking to not Harmony Central

Peavey Electronics Corporation, one of the world’s largest manufacturers of musical instruments and professional sound equipment, has initiated multiple actions against Behringer for various intellectual property issues, including patent infringement, false marking, trademark infringement and unfair competition.

The Behringer-related entities currently involved in these suits include: Music Group Services LU SARL, a corporation currently located on Mauritius (an island off the coast of Madagascar); Music Group Services US, Inc., a Washington state corporation; Behringer International GmbH, a German corporation; Behringer Holdings (PTE) Ltd., a Singapore company; Red Chip Company Ltd., a British Virgin Islands corporation; Behringer USA Inc., a Washington state corporation; and Behringer Spezielle Studiotechnik GmbH, a German corporation.

Peavey filed a lawsuit in 2009 against Behringer in U.S. District Court in New Jersey for patent infringement, federal and common law trademark infringement, false designation of origin, trademark dilution and unfair competition relating to, among other things, Peavey’s patented Feedback Locating System. More recently, Peavey filed an action against Behringer in the Southern District of Mississippi, accusing Behringer of infringing a patent relating to the Peavey Messenger® portable sound system.

Behringer filed a lawsuit against Peavey in the U.S. District Court in Seattle, Washington. Peavey has vehemently denied any wrong doing and is vigorously defending that baseless, retaliatory lawsuit.

“Behringer, MUSIC Group, and its numerous corporate identities in various locations, are no stranger to litigation against them for patent and trademark infringement,” stated Ronald Bienstock, attorney for Peavey. “Behringer has been a party to multiple intellectual property related lawsuits with other companies in the music instrument and pro audio industry.

“During its entire 46-year history, Peavey has always taken its responsibility to comply with governmental requirements seriously. Peavey engages in rigorous testing to ensure its products meet or exceed regulatory requirements.”

Bienstock also noted, “In light of the allegations raised by Behringer, I should emphasize that these groundless accusations are being posed by a competitor against whom Peavey has multiple legal actions pending in multiple U.S. District Courts, and in no way originate from any governmental agency.

“Peavey has a long history of innovation that the company has protected through patents, trademarks and other means. Over 46 years of operating, Peavey has earned over 200 patents in the United States and internationally. Peavey has also held about 700 trademarks here and abroad. Peavey strongly believes in intellectual property rights and will not be dissuaded by Behringer or anyone else from enforcing those rights.”
 
Dear baron55,

First of all BUGERA was not sued, and the lawsuits also had nothing to do with BUGERA.

However since you brought up the topic, please find the official response about the outcome which hopefully clarifies your question.

http://www.behringer.com/news/music-gro ... ectronics/

MUSIC Group Wins Major Patent Case against Peavey Electronics

Peavey Electronics Corporation has defended the failure of several of their products to meet Federal Safety and Emissions Standards (FCC) by deflecting the allegations made in US District Court by MUSIC Group. In a statement circulated yesterday, Peavey has repeatedly claimed that they are engaged in “multiple legal actions” against MUSIC Group’s brand Behringer, without disclosing either the nature or status of such actions.
In the release, Peavey cited a lawsuit filed against Behringer in 2009 for alleged patent infringement related to Feedback Location circuitry without disclosing that the presiding Judge already issued an opinion which rendered the claim as baseless. As a consequence, Peavey withdrew the claim recently but suppressed the judge’s finding and the fact that Behringer had in fact patented their own FBQ Feedback Identification system in multiple countries to defend its own intellectual property.
Another nonsensical lawsuit filed by Peavey centered on a labeling issue whereby the phrase “Patent Pending” was not replaced by “Patented” on products after the patents had been granted to Behringer in several countries. In their statement, Peavey also concealed the fact that they are the subject of a countersuit brought by MUSIC Group alleging exactly the same mislabeling issue. That case is ongoing.
“It is unfortunate that Peavey would address their declining fortunes in today’s marketplace by resorting to lawsuits against competitors and more important by cutting corners on testing and compliance. Their energies would be far better spent ensuring their products are safe for consumers and that they meet the requirements of the law rather than engaging in a confused and nonsensical attack on a successful company,” commented SVP Marketing, Costa Lakoumentas in response.
MUSIC Group has presented independent evidence in the form of test results from accredited third parties to substantiate the claims that 7 out of 10 Peavey products tested failed government safety and emissions standards (FCC). The case will be heard in the District Court of Seattle and the results will be made public as the case unfolds.
The MUSIC Group holds a substantial amount of intellectual property such as patents and trademarks. The Company will vigorously defend its rights against Peavey or anyone else.


Hope this helps.

Joe Sanborn
Manager, Channel Marketing
MUSIC Group
BUGERA
 
Back
Top