J
JackTripper
Well-known member
If your enemy thinks they are in control, even though you pull the daily strings and control the direction year after year, is that necessarily a bad thing for you? Yeah, they roar once in a while, and you pat them on the head and keep them in their boxLetting the current government of Iran exist - even though it's the result of US and UK internal interference - for 40+ years was a mistake; and the longer we waited to deal with this regime the more difficult and costly it became. Reagan should have taken them out before they gained total and solid control of Iran, while they were still weak. Once they started abusing their own people at a large scale, and the people tried to uprise we had another chance, and obama did nothing but send them cash for nothing.
This is the price the US has to pay with interest for the 1953 Iran coup and installation of the Shah. Its long overdue, and worth the price IMO.
Or do you take out this enemy completely, only to face a new and likely more unpredictable one that may resent and despise you for generations.
I'm talking the containment vs regime change argument. You are for the latter?