COURT ORDERED RELEASE OF PFIZER DOCUMENT REVEALS 82% – 97% OF VACCINATED PREGNANT WOMEN LOST THEIR BABIES
- Thread starter SQUAREHEAD
- Start date
harddriver
Well-known member
Never before in history have pregnant women been encouraged to take anything that could remotely affect the pregnancy.....NEVER...
Let alone an experimental gene therapy injection......................
Until now...............................................................................................
Well, except for Thalidomide which was FDA approved in the 1950's an 1960's for the treatment of nausea in pregnant women and caused severe births defects and missing limbs of children. It took many years to show that is was the Thalidomide that was causing the severe birth defects.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21507989/
Let alone an experimental gene therapy injection......................
Until now...............................................................................................
Well, except for Thalidomide which was FDA approved in the 1950's an 1960's for the treatment of nausea in pregnant women and caused severe births defects and missing limbs of children. It took many years to show that is was the Thalidomide that was causing the severe birth defects.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21507989/
Abstract
Thalidomide was a widely used drug in the late 1950s and early 1960s for the treatment of nausea in pregnant women. It became apparent in the 1960s that thalidomide treatment resulted in severe birth defects in thousands of children. Though the use of thalidomide was banned in most countries at that time, thalidomide proved to be a useful treatment for leprosy and later, multiple myeloma. In rural areas of the world that lack extensive medical surveillance initiatives, thalidomide treatment of pregnant women with leprosy has continued to cause malformations. Research on thalidomide mechanisms of action is leading to a better understanding of molecular targets. With an improved understanding of these molecular targets, safer drugs may be designed. The thalidomide tragedy marked a turning point in toxicity testing, as it prompted United States and international regulatory agencies to develop systematic toxicity testing protocols; the use of thalidomide as a tool in developmental biology led to important discoveries in the biochemical pathways of limb development. In celebration of the Society of Toxicology's 50th Anniversary, which coincides with the 50th anniversary of the withdrawal of thalidomide from the market, it is appropriate to revisit the lessons learned from the thalidomide tragedy of the 1960s.
Last edited:
Findthetone1
Well-known member
So have any reports of you possessing any shred of intelligence or common sense so…
SQUAREHEAD
Well-known member
Yep…
A good friend of mine has a daughter who is a nurse, of course, she was forced to take the jabs to keep her job.
She got pregnant, (she has two perfect children, no problems at all), after she took the second jab, (2 days later), she miscarried her baby. And get this, her doctors and specialists have all told her, “it’s just a coincidence, nothing to do with the vaccine”. This is the bullshit that’s being force-fed constantly.
And the ignorant masses are blind as usual.
After all, we have nothing to worry about as ‘fact-check’ says this is just misinformation, The jabs are ‘safe and effective’
First dead giveaway of corruption and fraud is how hard Pfizer fought tooth and nail to try keeping ALL of this information from populations of the world for 75 years!
… That says it all, done.
Last edited:
CrazyNutz
Well-known member
Yep…
A good friend of mine has a daughter who is a nurse, of course, she was forced to take the jabs to keep her job.
She got pregnant, (she has two perfect children, no problems at all), after she took the second jab, (2 days later), she miscarried her baby. And get this, her doctors and specialists have all told her, “it’s just a coincidence, nothing to do with the vaccine”. This is the bullshit that’s being force-fed constantly.
And the ignorant masses are blind as usual.
After all, we have nothing to worry about as ‘fact-check’ says this is just misinformation, The jabs are ‘safe and effective’
First dead giveaway of corruption and fraud is how hard Pfizer fought tooth and nail to try keeping ALL of this information from populations of the world for 75 years!
… That says it all, done.
Sorry for your friend, but that story is a sample size of 1.
Miscarriage is extremely common. The rate is anywhere from 5 to 27% depending on the mothers age.
CrazyNutz
Well-known member
In other news, the reports of you loving cock has been confirmed
Findthetone1
Well-known member
Wow. Weak and lacking depth. Much like your craniumIn other news, the reports of you loving cock has been confirmed
CrazyNutz
Well-known member
Perhaps, but one thing's for sure, your cock receptacle does not lack depth
Findthetone1
Well-known member
You sure seem to have dick fetish. Something you need to get off your chest? It’s OK buddy, come on out. Closets are for clothes.Perhaps, but one thing's for sure, your cock receptacle does not lack depth
He's a closet pedo, code name "Black Grandpa".
harddriver
Well-known member
Are you claiming the Federal Court ordered release of information is not real and part of a narrative??? If so could you please debunk that Pfizer and the FDA has been ordered to release upwards of 55,000 documents per month into the fall of 2022 until all of the FDA submitted documentation is made public.Here we go again. This shit is debunked all over the place. But It fits you guys narrative so it's good as gospel
Don't you think you have the right to know what the clinical trial and EUA submitted data actually says? If you don't care what you put into your body that is fine...but other people also have the right to know as has been codified in international and Federal laws.
If one purchased some cannabis to roll your own for a nice quiet evening at home but the dispensary did didn't know it was laced with fentanyl I would venture to say there would be some litigation because the cannabis sold by a reputable dispensary was promised to be safe and effective...if the fentanyl didn't kill you or a family member.
Would you have taken the injection or allowed your family to take it had you known they were only 12% effective at best?
Last edited:
harddriver
Well-known member
Pfizer quietly admits it will never manufacture original FDA approved COVID vaccines
https://dossier.substack.com/p/ghost-shot-pfizer-quietly-admits?s=r
Excerpt from the substackarticle:
The information operation succeeded. There was indeed an FDA approved vaccine, at least on paper, but you couldn’t get it.
When originally confronted with this ordeal, Pfizer labeled this issue an inventory question that had nothing to do with the legal distinction between an experimental EUA product and an FDA-approved vaccine. Up until just weeks ago, this was the statement up on the CDC website via Pfizer:
In May, Pfizer updated its statement to mention a December 2021 licensed Comirnaty product, which was granted a license four months after the highly-publicized August FDA press release.
And just last week, Pfizer finally acknowledged that its original licensed product will never be distributed. In an unreported update on the CDC website, Pfizer told the agency:
Here we go again. This shit is debunked all over the place. But It fits you guys narrative so it's good as gospel
harddriver
Well-known member
The FDA standard regarding efficacy of any drug or treatment has been 50% anything less is considered useless. Please look it up.
So if the court ordered release of the initial clinical trial data shows that efficacy was 12% and some clinical trial show efficacy of less than 1% that means that what was promised at 95% efficacy was a fraudulent lie. That's why Fauci and Gates not longer tout the 95% efficacy...Gates recently said the vaccines don't work well at all an they need new vaccines...that video is out there and he is the main investor in Pfizer/Biontech.
https://www.raps.org/news-and-artic...ssues-covid-19-vaccine-guidance-setting-50-ef
In an immediately effective guidance issued Tuesday, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sets its expectations for the development and licensure of vaccines to prevent coronavirus disease (COVID-19), including considerations for manufacturing, nonclinical and clinical studies and post-licensure requirements.
For a vaccine that would be widely deployed against COVID-19, FDA says it expects sponsors to demonstrate that the vaccine is at least 50% effective in a placebo-controlled trial.
At a Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee hearing the same day, FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn, MD, testified that FDA would maintain its standards and independence in its decision to approve any vaccines for COVID-19.
“While the FDA is committed to help expedite this work, we will not cut corners in our decision making and we are making clear in our guidance what are the data we need that should be submitted to meet our regulatory standards for approval,” Hahn told the committee.
In a press release issued alongside the guidance, Peter Marks, MD, PhD, director of FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), echoed Hahn’s statements, saying, “Make no mistake: the FDA will only approve or make available a COVID-19 vaccine if we determine that it meets the high standards that people have come to expect of the agency.”
So if the court ordered release of the initial clinical trial data shows that efficacy was 12% and some clinical trial show efficacy of less than 1% that means that what was promised at 95% efficacy was a fraudulent lie. That's why Fauci and Gates not longer tout the 95% efficacy...Gates recently said the vaccines don't work well at all an they need new vaccines...that video is out there and he is the main investor in Pfizer/Biontech.
https://www.raps.org/news-and-artic...ssues-covid-19-vaccine-guidance-setting-50-ef
FDA issues COVID-19 vaccine guidance, setting 50% effectiveness threshold
Posted 30 June 2020 | By Michael Mezher
In an immediately effective guidance issued Tuesday, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sets its expectations for the development and licensure of vaccines to prevent coronavirus disease (COVID-19), including considerations for manufacturing, nonclinical and clinical studies and post-licensure requirements.
For a vaccine that would be widely deployed against COVID-19, FDA says it expects sponsors to demonstrate that the vaccine is at least 50% effective in a placebo-controlled trial.
At a Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee hearing the same day, FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn, MD, testified that FDA would maintain its standards and independence in its decision to approve any vaccines for COVID-19.
“While the FDA is committed to help expedite this work, we will not cut corners in our decision making and we are making clear in our guidance what are the data we need that should be submitted to meet our regulatory standards for approval,” Hahn told the committee.
In a press release issued alongside the guidance, Peter Marks, MD, PhD, director of FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), echoed Hahn’s statements, saying, “Make no mistake: the FDA will only approve or make available a COVID-19 vaccine if we determine that it meets the high standards that people have come to expect of the agency.”
CrazyNutz
Well-known member
Elaborate on the "Black Grandpa" part please, It's just not clear what you're trying to say.
CrazyNutz
Well-known member
Hey, I'm just trying to use words that you relate to the most. Words that make you feel calm, and comfortable. Much like this pacifier
Findthetone1
Well-known member
Wow. I hope your husband washed that off after using it on you.Hey, I'm just trying to use words that you relate to the most. Words that make you feel calm, and comfortable. Much like this pacifier
CrazyNutz
Well-known member
Never said that the release is not real.
The problem with this new "claim" you guy are running with is it's deeply flawed, and a misrepresentation of the data.
The report in question says out 270 women, only 34 of the outcomes were reported. Out of the 34 reported 28 miscarried.
THE FLAW: You don't know the outcome of the 238 non-reported
Of course, if you want it to fit your narrative you just assume the 238 non-reported have the same miscarriage rate as the 34 reported, which is what you guys are doing.
A more logical way to look at it is the 238 women had no problems, so they didn't bother reporting. That would put the actual miscarriage rate around 12% which is in line with the normal/typical miscarriage rate.
Regardless, this study is worthless, and we cannot draw a conclusion either way.
CrazyNutz
Well-known member
Is that because you don't want to put a dirty dick in your mouth?
What's with your husband fetish? You're looking at my avatar, and fantasizing about another man all over that aren't you, you freak