Did a quick vid of my mesa boogie 50 calliber

  • Thread starter Thread starter Big Rich
  • Start date Start date
wheelman":h5iakqrd said:
That's the first one I seen with metal toggles. Nice amps.

Is there a difference in circuit for the ones with the metal toggles compared to the plastic rocker switches?
 
blackba":qe3olehc said:
wheelman":qe3olehc said:
That's the first one I seen with metal toggles. Nice amps.

Is there a difference in circuit for the ones with the metal toggles compared to the plastic rocker switches?


I don't know. That's the first one I've seen with the metal toggles. I buy the small boxes just because I like the way they look. I like them although I've had two sound a little different, but I think it was more due to the tubes that were in them. All mine had plastic rockers, 6l6's, graphic eq and were +'s. All mine are meaner than rectos in the gain. I'm talking pre 100 rectos because that's all I ever owned. I can't compare them to anything newer. Rectos' got that bottom end thing going for them though. All my calibers were tight as teeth except DC's. That's not the same amp they are chunkier and smoother. I'd rather have the pissed off gain of the 50 caliber + myself. Just a matter of preference.
 
jerrydyer":26j4ga8o said:
sounds hot rodded. I had one. It was great for santana type stuff not rockin like that.


Pulling the 750 slider down does wonders for getting rid of the Santana thing :D
It's a very brutal amp in its own right. I also play mine with an EMG 81.
 
nice playing , sounds a little too scooped but otherwise great
 
50 calibers are highly underated amps, love em myself. meshuggah used em on the none ep. i still have my .22 combo as well. played through the dc-5, but never got to try out the dc-10.
 
I run the gain lower and boost with an SD-1 or Tubescreamer, and I run my EQ a little different. Mine's also the + model with 6L6s. I love that amp though! Nice clip!
 
Ancient Alien":2xss9f6a said:
I love the fish on the right side going nuts :lol: :LOL:
The 22 and 50 calibers are serious high gain amps.
They are based on the Mark series.
And their cleans can be dialed in beautifully.
I still have my 22 I bought in 89

I still have my 22 combo from '86 (I think). Won it in a guitar contest that Marty Friedman was also in - I came in 1st, he came in 2nd!!! What a JOKE!(the contest, not Marty) Glad I got the amp, though. For low volume practicing, nothing I have is better. The clean and mild gain tones are great, as well. The graphic is a must. Without it, it's a very mediocre amp at best. My only complaint is the balance between the channels. Set for higher gain, the clean channel is too loud.
 
Every time I hear a .50 cal it sounds awsome,I have one and it sounds like shit,kinda flobby and loose with nasty highs. Yours sounds tits.
 
I have one on my bench (a 50s "+") right now, its pretty cool sounding. The clean is very nice and the second channel very mean, thats the right word for it . . .

This one hummed a lot, some resistors were freaky soldered (standing "up") to the board (stock) and needed resoldering and replacement - and the miniature reverb tank sucks (I know that you guys won't use it all :D ).

Nice little amp nonetheless.
 
duesentrieb":193qk5jy said:
I have one on my bench (a 50s "+") right now, its pretty cool sounding. The clean is very nice and the second channel very mean, thats the right word for it . . .

This one hummed a lot, some resistors were freaky soldered (standing "up") to the board (stock) and needed resoldering and replacement - and the miniature reverb tank sucks (I know that you guys won't use it all :D ).

Nice little amp nonetheless.


My only gripe with it is the shared preamp-gain knob really.
Since you can assign the GEQ to only the overdrive channel, you can sculpt two usable eq'd sounds, but getting the angriest overdrive, and a "clean" clean at the same time is difficult.

I saw this mod, so it looks like there's a "cure" for that, though :)
 

Attachments

  • cal_mod1.jpg
    cal_mod1.jpg
    118.2 KB · Views: 1,959
  • cal_mod2.jpg
    cal_mod2.jpg
    125.8 KB · Views: 1,923
  • cal_mod3.jpg
    cal_mod3.jpg
    70 KB · Views: 1,938
Thanks Knut. :)

Thats like doubling the "volume" me thinks - if I should ever stumble over one (cheap) I will try to get it for satellite use only - I like my own stuff better than the Caliber/Mark-sounds. Additonally the combo-shell isn't really that "big" (my Einstein shell is a lot heavier, deeper and wider), so it sounds (as a 1x12") much better - I just came back from switching forth and back my Combo and this Caliber, flipping speakers and such.
 
I've been thinking about trading my Single Rec for one of these, but now I'm afraid I won't be able to get a nice clean tone and the high gain sounds I need. I need to be able to quickly switch from a pristine clean sound to teh brootlz on the fly.
 
ke2":t4b9xn9w said:
duesentrieb":t4b9xn9w said:
I have one on my bench (a 50s "+") right now, its pretty cool sounding. The clean is very nice and the second channel very mean, thats the right word for it . . .

This one hummed a lot, some resistors were freaky soldered (standing "up") to the board (stock) and needed resoldering and replacement - and the miniature reverb tank sucks (I know that you guys won't use it all :D ).

Nice little amp nonetheless.


My only gripe with it is the shared preamp-gain knob really.
Since you can assign the GEQ to only the overdrive channel, you can sculpt two usable eq'd sounds, but getting the angriest overdrive, and a "clean" clean at the same time is difficult.

I saw this mod, so it looks like there's a "cure" for that, though :)

Is that mod on a 22 or 50?
I have an old metal switch Studio 22

And do you know what value pot is used?
 
CaseyCor":3aternc2 said:
I've been thinking about trading my Single Rec for one of these, but now I'm afraid I won't be able to get a nice clean tone and the high gain sounds I need. I need to be able to quickly switch from a pristine clean sound to teh brootlz on the fly.

I did a little research on these, if you get the Dual cailber series like a DC5, they have separate controls for each channel. They do sound different than the 50 caliber from what I read, but you get more versatility....
 
Ancient Alien":37pjlvcz said:
ke2":37pjlvcz said:
duesentrieb":37pjlvcz said:
I have one on my bench (a 50s "+") right now, its pretty cool sounding. The clean is very nice and the second channel very mean, thats the right word for it . . .

This one hummed a lot, some resistors were freaky soldered (standing "up") to the board (stock) and needed resoldering and replacement - and the miniature reverb tank sucks (I know that you guys won't use it all :D ).

Nice little amp nonetheless.


My only gripe with it is the shared preamp-gain knob really.
Since you can assign the GEQ to only the overdrive channel, you can sculpt two usable eq'd sounds, but getting the angriest overdrive, and a "clean" clean at the same time is difficult.

I saw this mod, so it looks like there's a "cure" for that, though :)

Is that mod on a 22 or 50?
I have an old metal switch Studio 22

And do you know what value pot is used?
It should be just another 1M log (audio) pot. Overall both will have 500k then, which brightens the sound a tiny bit though. But since the amp itself isn't already overly bright . . .
 
CaseyCor":2pnl4u1k said:
I've been thinking about trading my Single Rec for one of these, but now I'm afraid I won't be able to get a nice clean tone and the high gain sounds I need. I need to be able to quickly switch from a pristine clean sound to teh brootlz on the fly.

You'll be able to get these tones easily. That's exactly how I have mine set up.
 
GuitarGoat":15ui3yib said:
CaseyCor":15ui3yib said:
I've been thinking about trading my Single Rec for one of these, but now I'm afraid I won't be able to get a nice clean tone and the high gain sounds I need. I need to be able to quickly switch from a pristine clean sound to teh brootlz on the fly.

You'll be able to get these tones easily. That's exactly how I have mine set up.
Very cool. Wanna trade? :D
 
duesentrieb":3k5htayq said:
Ancient Alien":3k5htayq said:
ke2":3k5htayq said:
duesentrieb":3k5htayq said:
I have one on my bench (a 50s "+") right now, its pretty cool sounding. The clean is very nice and the second channel very mean, thats the right word for it . . .

This one hummed a lot, some resistors were freaky soldered (standing "up") to the board (stock) and needed resoldering and replacement - and the miniature reverb tank sucks (I know that you guys won't use it all :D ).

Nice little amp nonetheless.


My only gripe with it is the shared preamp-gain knob really.
Since you can assign the GEQ to only the overdrive channel, you can sculpt two usable eq'd sounds, but getting the angriest overdrive, and a "clean" clean at the same time is difficult.

I saw this mod, so it looks like there's a "cure" for that, though :)

Is that mod on a 22 or 50?
I have an old metal switch Studio 22

And do you know what value pot is used?
It should be just another 1M log (audio) pot. Overall both will have 500k then, which brightens the sound a tiny bit though. But since the amp itself isn't already overly bright . . .
I figured a 1M, but want to be sure.
And I want to see if that is a 22 or 50 before I pull mine apart and find out it's a 50 and I can't add that mod.
 
blackba":1yz7wpse said:
CaseyCor":1yz7wpse said:
I've been thinking about trading my Single Rec for one of these, but now I'm afraid I won't be able to get a nice clean tone and the high gain sounds I need. I need to be able to quickly switch from a pristine clean sound to teh brootlz on the fly.

I did a little research on these, if you get the Dual cailber series like a DC5, they have separate controls for each channel. They do sound different than the 50 caliber from what I read, but you get more versatility....


Yep DC5 is thicker slightly looser smoother tone. The .50 is tighter ( thinner) and more pissed less picky about pickups if you want to grind out. Both cool amps.
 
Back
Top