bananaladonpcp":x14j565f said:
Peter Diezel":x14j565f said:
Was just a bit upset but deleted my post
because I got an email from Jon.
Sorry
If i didn't need to change out the chip for this pedal to work and if it was about 100 bucks cheaper I might consider it because all i need is the basic functions. but with that said i think i will buy the Columbus pedal. I'm fairly certain i will need a full midi controller in the future.
NO ONE makes a product like you Peter.
You SHOULD NOT need to change out the chip for the pedal to work. I THINK if it's 2005 or older you MIGHT have to depending on if they changed the firmware around that time but perhaps Peter can clarify if this is the case. And if this is in fact the case, you can either get the latest Diezel firmware from Diezel direct or (if it's OK with Peter) I can send out a stock Diezel chip free of charge with the foot switch.
Also I will mention that because the foot switch works via the MIDI In port, there is no way for the amp to talk to the foot switch. This means that if you switch something at the front panel of the amp while the foot switch is connected to the amp, the amp has no way to tell the foot switch that you switched something at the panel. To get the switch for the function you switched back in sync with the amp, you will have to double press the foot switch for the function that was switched at the panel. This is a known quirk of the MIDI protocol as I'm sure most of you already know, but thought I'd mention this anyway so all are on the same page.