R
Racerxrated
Well-known member
What I am saying is it is not a legitimate site, for the simple fact that ANYONE can post there. So, we don't know WHAT is real and WHAT is not. I'll give you an example from my place of employment:VAERS is a government run vaccine adverse reaction tracking program, it is not private. The site that reprints the data is www.opensvaers.com from the CDC VAERS site. Yes it can be a self reporting situation, and a Harvard study also states that the underreporting of VAERS is 90+ percent. So you are suggesting that all the data on the VAERS site is invalid and does not show a single safety signal reagarding these injections?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine_Adverse_Event_Reporting_System
VAERS is co-managed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). VAERS accepts and analyzes reports of adverse events (possible side effects) after a person has received a vaccination. Anyone can report an adverse event to VAERS.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/monitoring/vaers/index.html
We have more than a few anti vaxxers at work. One is a provider. Super nice lady; but she ran and posted an 'event' of shingles on this very site. The example was related to another employee, who is over 50, was super stressed out going through a divorce and yes had the vaccine. So being the anti vaxxer she is, she posted this 'event'. Except, the person who had shingles is: Over 50, super stressed out, and had Chicken Pox before. Those are the common triggers for Shingles to occur. Yet the provider still posted that on the VAERS site.
Was it the vaccine? Maybe. Was it not the vaccine and just other normal triggers to cause her Shingles? Maybe. Bottom line? We don't know for sure. That's my point. There's no ACTUAL PROOF that ANYTHING on VAERS is really due to the vaccine.
That's why it's very questionable to use VAERS as legitimate proof of anything.