Dr. Drew on the new study shows 50% of young men who got myocarditis after the vaccine now have permanent heart damage

[VonBonfire]

When anyone at all, i.e. right wing extremist individuals can simply report anything they want like maybe a total lie/BS to inflate numbers, well by definition VAERS is not a reliable source of info. Especially since the far right is on a mission to fight on in the 'vaccine wars' for whatever reason.

Anti vax was mostly the realm of lefty soccer moms previous to covid. For all the magatard insults lefties throw around in here they sure lined up to take Trump's supposedly hastily made vax. You're watching the the narrative now oozing evidence some of them shots were no bueno and denying that there is any problem.

Soon the drip drip drip will be a torrent of negatives about the "safe and effective". Like I said, smoking cigarettes is completely safe, that's your argument. Next you and every other lefty will want compensation before they die but they'll just buzz you with a nice 5g signal and you'll turn into an antenna. Maybe that's the next fake nuke attack, just frying vaxxed people like potato chips. RF burns are real. I wish you would've thought the shot through a little better.

 

[Racerxrated]

Anti vax was mostly the realm of lefty soccer moms previous to covid. For all the magatard insults lefties throw around in here they sure lined up to take Trump's supposedly hastily made vax. You're watching the the narrative now oozing evidence some of them shots were no bueno and denying that there is any problem.

Soon the drip drip drip will be a torrent of negatives about the "safe and effective". Like I said, smoking cigarettes is completely safe, that's your argument. Next you and every other lefty will want compensation before they die but they'll just buzz you with a nice 5g signal and you'll turn into an antenna. Maybe that's the next fake nuke attack, just frying vaxxed people like potato chips. RF burns are real. I wish you would've thought the shot through a little better.

Ok Qtard. Let us know when you post your next full of shit lie that can easily be proven. You clowns are low hanging fruit....just way too easy to blow up your fake news narrative.
Lets see....
Magatards...."Hey look! Dr Drew said there's lots and lots of young people with permanent heart damage!" "wow that proves everything!!"

Anyone with common sense....."It looks like the study Dr Drew quoted shows a risk of a 1 one hundredth of 1% chance that anyone in the age group 12-39yo getting any form of Carditis...that's a REALLY small chance."
Nothing to see there....just more 'fake news scare tactics' that can't quote real science giving real numbers.
"No, VAERS is legit! It's associated with REAL science!!!"
No, ANYONE can post or report an adverse event. Leaving it wide open to ANYONE posting lies bullshit and more lies. Therefore, VAERS is easily subject to false manipulation.
More nothing burger fake news from the Far Right Extremists.

 

[Dan Gleesak]

Damn all those extreme right wing doctors and scientists!

Do you believe doctors and scientists can be persuaded by the left but not the right?

 

[Ben Waylin]

 

[VonBonfire]

Ok Qtard. Let us know when you post your next full of shit lie that can easily be proven.

I don't need any evidence. The coercion and manipulation was sinister so the shot should be avoided.

 

[Krull]

Do you believe doctors and scientists can be persuaded by the left but not the right?

 

[Dan Gleesak]

Ok Qtard. Let us know when you post your next full of shit lie that can easily be proven. You clowns are low hanging fruit....just way too easy to blow up your fake news narrative.
Lets see....
Magatards...."Hey look! Dr Drew said there's lots and lots of young people with permanent heart damage!" "wow that proves everything!!"

Anyone with common sense....."It looks like the study Dr Drew quoted shows a risk of a 1 one hundredth of 1% chance that anyone in the age group 12-39yo getting any form of Carditis...that's a REALLY small chance."
Nothing to see there....just more 'fake news scare tactics' that can't quote real science giving real numbers.
"No, VAERS is legit! It's associated with REAL science!!!"
No, ANYONE can post or report an adverse event. Leaving it wide open to ANYONE posting lies bullshit and more lies. Therefore, VAERS is easily subject to false manipulation.
More nothing burger fake news from the Far Right Extremists.

It’s funny because their argument for why the vaccine is so deadly is the exact opposite of their argument against global warming

*myocarditis is a potential side effect of the vaccine- “well clearly every myocarditis case is vaccine related”

*CO2 in the atmosphere causes temps to rise and there has been more and more CO2 in the atmosphere every year -“yea but that’s just a coincidence, it’s just a cycle”

 

[Dan Gleesak]

so that’s a yes

 

[Krull]

so that’s a yes

What the fuck does being a scientist or a doctor have to do with political affiliation? I was being sarcastic ? cause after all you got the Maga Trump vaccine ?

 

[Bad Brain]

So, this proves what? That there were a lot of deaths during Covid? Wow news flash. Oh, and the teal number? All non Covid vaccine deaths? Gimme a break. This is a fake news graph, from a BS source. Completely made up. It doesn't even make sense.
When anyone at all, i.e. right wing extremist individuals can simply report anything they want like maybe a total lie/BS to inflate numbers, well by definition VAERS is not a reliable source of info. Especially since the far right is on a mission to fight on in the 'vaccine wars' for whatever reason.

Dude, VAERS is not a conspiracy theory or some “far-right” website. It is created and maintained by the federal government for the purpose I described. I’m not claiming that there couldn’t be false entries, but you need to demonstrate that before you assume it invalidates the entire thing. It is actually generally understood and accepted that there exists an under reporting factor of around 35-40, per a Harvard study I can find if you’d like. I’m not aware of any studies suggesting it is full of fraudulent reports or otherwise over reported in any way. They don’t make it easy to file a report — they are involved and take a half hour or so to fill out.

 

[Dan Gleesak]

What the fuck does being a scientist or a doctor have to do with political affiliation? I was being sarcastic ? cause after all you got the Maga Trump vaccine ?

You are a weird dude

 

[Bad Brain]

 

[Bad Brain]

https://www.igor-chudov.com/p/covid-vaccines-damage-all-hearts

 

[VonBonfire]

They failed the heart check of steadfast resistance to being a guinea pig and now they are failing the actual heart check. Somewhat ironic, but sad tbh.

 

[Bad Brain]

https://brownstone.org/articles/cdc-refusing-new-covid-vaccine-adverse-event-reports/

 

[Bad Brain]

“NHTSA is still accepting safety reports on things like my 30-year-old Ford Bronco II, but the CDC isn’t accepting new safety reports on 2-year old novel mRNA vaccines.”

 

[Bad Brain]

Back when it was “Trump’s” vaccine:

“CNN —
Vaccine experts are warning the federal government against rushing out a coronavirus vaccine before testing has shown it’s both safe and effective. Decades of history show why they’re right.”

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/09/01/health/eua-coronavirus-vaccine-history/index.html

 

[Racerxrated]

Dude, VAERS is not a conspiracy theory or some “far-right” website. It is created and maintained by the federal government for the purpose I described. I’m not claiming that there couldn’t be false entries, but you need to demonstrate that before you assume it invalidates the entire thing. It is actually generally understood and accepted that there exists an under reporting factor of around 35-40, per a Harvard study I can find if you’d like. I’m not aware of any studies suggesting it is full of fraudulent reports or otherwise over reported in any way. They don’t make it easy to file a report — they are involved and take a half hour or so to fill out.

The fact remains that, since it CAN be manipulated, it isn’t truly reliable now is it?
And, no I don’t have to show proof of anything. It’s the anti vaxxers that need to come up with solid proof to back their claims. And no, those two ‘examples’ are just bs right wing fake studies.

 

[Bad Brain]

The fact remains that, since it CAN be manipulated, it isn’t truly reliable now is it?

No, the limitations are understood and accepted. If it’s useless, why to they direct people there and continue to maintain the resource? Maybe “Far-right” elements have infiltrated the CDC?

 

[Bad Brain]

And no, those two ‘examples’ are just bs right wing fake studies.

This is an far-right extremist website? ?