Duty to Retreat

  • Thread starter Thread starter rsm
  • Start date Start date
rsm

rsm

Well-known member
States that adhere to duty to retreat laws include: Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York and Rhode Island.


:LOL:



haha.gif


surprised California, Oregon, Washington, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Illinois, Michigan and others aren't on this list.


 
Not surprising,. MN has always been a screwed up state where the DFL was somehow forever entrenched. The scandahoovians brought their shitty socialist policies there and when combined with tribual politics and lack of opportunities you have a recipe for corruption, crime, and a weird authoritarianism that the left seems to have adopted as part of their platform federally. Strangely enough it was one of the few places where a real candidate was elected; governor Jesse Ventura. They basically ran him through the mud on a statewide scale kind of like Trump except Jesse was true to his promises and not the self aggrandizing type of Epstein island visitor Trump is. It's a beautiful state with good fishing and lots of mosquitoes but you couldn't pay me to live there again.
 
Interesting that high crime rates have similar state listings, only missing California.

I'm sure as soon as the ruling demoncrat parasites in California realize they're not a duty to retreat state, they'll fix that.

Since I have no interest or plans to visit or live in California, maybe I should just point it out to them... maybe starting with @JohnnyGtar state rep and state senator, and mayor would be best? :D
 
Its only redeeming qualities.
Agreed. I spent mucho time on some of those lakes and rivers. The other nice part is if you are stuck there there is a ton of state land to camp on free of charge if you can stand the mosquitoes. If you can you can have many hundreds or even thousands of acres rent and tax free cause no one else will want to come back there to camp mostly except you still gotta watch out for drunk rednecks 4x4'ing out there so being armed is kinda critical.
 
Seems like a lot to do about nothing. Massachusetts is duty to retreat, unless the other guy has a gun. So, sucks to anyone hoping to shoot an unarmed man I guess…..
 
  • Haha
Reactions: rsm
Same. I’m in Chatham county.
Seems like a lot to do about nothing. Massachusetts is duty to retreat, unless the other guy has a gun. So, sucks to anyone hoping to shoot an unarmed man I guess…..
well that should deter armed criminals in MA; knowing how difficult it is to own a firearm, especially a handgun, in most of MA.

Here, most of the armed crimes are in blue areas where criminals have a higher probability their victims aren't armed.
 
well that should deter armed criminals in MA; knowing how difficult it is to own a firearm, especially a handgun, in most of MA.
outside of being mugged on the street by someone without a gun, I’m not sure the mass laws really hinder much
 
outside of being mugged on the street by someone without a gun, I’m not sure the mass laws really hinder much
Until an aggressive stray wanders into your hood and starts sizing up your kids playing in the front yard for lunch. Easy access to guns is a necessity for rural life.
 
outside of being mugged on the street by someone without a gun, I’m not sure the mass laws really hinder much
the MA laws only hinder victims, not the criminals. I know if I was a criminal, I'd go to a location that has laws and prosecutors in my favor
 
See. Every fucking thing you say.

It’s not my fault you think that is leftist. The mass laws say that you can’t shoot someone unless they also have a gun, or if they are in your house. That seems pretty fair dude lol
 
It’s not my fault you think that is leftist. The mass laws say that you can’t shoot someone unless they also have a gun, or if they are in your house. That seems pretty fair dude lol
lol. Yeah, it's real funny. I'm sure you think it's common sense. As usual though you're incorrect. Ya know who it isn't fair to ? A woman who is being chased by a couple of guys. Or a diminutive man being accosted by 5 gang members. Or ANYONE who's life is being threatened by anyone else who doesn't have a gun. It's borderline retarded. Just like all MASS gun laws.

Fair is if your life or the life of someone else is threatened you can respond with deadly force. It's so fair that it's actually the law in the majority of the states in this country. Your state just has it's head up it's ass.
 
lol. Yeah, it's real funny. I'm sure you think it's common sense. As usual though you're incorrect. Ya know who it isn't fair to ? A woman who is being chased by a couple of guys. Or a diminutive man being accosted by 5 gang members. Or ANYONE who's life is being threatened by anyone else who doesn't have a gun. It's borderline retarded. Just like all MASS gun laws.

Fair is if your life or the life of someone else is threatened you can respond with deadly force. It's so fair that it's actually the law in the majority of the states in this country. Your state just has it's head up it's ass.


So what did you think I meant when I said “outside of being mugged on the street it doesn’t hinder much”?
 
Back
Top