
Tonelover
Well-known member
It's not hard to read the post that I quotedSo, what's your problem? Blame who for what?
It's not hard to read the post that I quotedSo, what's your problem? Blame who for what?
So, you are asking "who is to blame" for our entire financial system, and the trouble it's in?It's not hard to read the post that I quoted
You as well dipshit.OK. Have a good one.
Who else should those "powers that be" be blaming this on?
I think that's part of it, but he's also convinced (Or at least says) that foreigners pay these tarrifs. He also looks to America's economic golden age when the federal government was funded by tariffs and thinks that was the source of our prosperity. I think it was rather that the government was a small part of our GDP at the time and didn't stifle entrepreneurialism with all the rules and regulations that we currently have. It would be great to get back to that, and to Trump's credit he's taking steps to shrink government, but I'm not optimistic that it is possible without crashing the whole system. More likely we will end up with reduced income taxes for lower earners, maybe no income taxes at some level and the tariffs.I assumed Trump was just threatening tariffs in order to get better trade deals.
I'm behind greatly reduced income taxes and letting tariffs cover that. If they don't, tariff them some more. The charts have all been posted, and even with Trump's tariffs we are still getting the raw deal from most of the world. All those other nations protect their industries and the people working in them with tariffs but ours. And people get pissed when we ask for a square deal. We went from being an industrial giant to DickMonalds and Chick Fil A in 70 years. Pathetic.I think that's part of it, but he's also convinced (Or at least says) that foreigners pay these tarrifs. He also looks to America's economic golden age when the federal government was funded by tariffs and thinks that was the source of our prosperity. I think it was rather that the government was a small part of our GDP at the time and didn't stifle entrepreneurialism with all the rules and regulations that we currently have. It would be great to get back to that, and to Trump's credit he's taking steps to shrink government, but I'm not optimistic that it is possible without crashing the whole system. More likely we will end up with reduced income taxes for lower earners, maybe no income taxes at some level and the tariffs.
I think that's part of it, but he's also convinced (Or at least says) that foreigners pay these tarrifs. He also looks to America's economic golden age when the federal government was funded by tariffs and thinks that was the source of our prosperity. I think it was rather that the government was a small part of our GDP at the time and didn't stifle entrepreneurialism with all the rules and regulations that we currently have. It would be great to get back to that, and to Trump's credit he's taking steps to shrink government, but I'm not optimistic that it is possible without crashing the whole system. More likely we will end up with reduced income taxes for lower earners, maybe no income taxes at some level and the tariffs.
It's not just blue collar. Probably more 'white' and a bit above what constitutes blue collar jobs have been outsourced. Probably 95% of the benefits of global free trade have ultimately wound up in the hands of the top 5%. Those people don't spend those profits at the rate to keep the economy of the country they live in functioning. They reinvest in things like real estate (further detriment to the middle class by driving cost up in speculation) and stocks (more speculation, ridiculous overvaluing of companies instead of building new ones). Huge costs that are shared by everyone in the country have gone into enforcing policy that only benefit this top percentile (so there's an argument for huge taxes on that top income bracket if you wanted to make one).Theoretically we are better off with free trade, but I suspect that the benefits are mostly captured by big transnational businesses and the upper class at the expense of blue collar workers.
Great well where the hell has real free trade been for the US over the past 70+ years......Theoretically we are better off with free trade, but I suspect that the benefits are mostly captured by big transnational businesses and the upper class at the expense of blue collar workers.
I mean, how much more proof do you to all need before you admit that you're suckers? No problem arguing that some things could be tweaked a bit but you have chosen the worst possible person for the job.
What is if some of you are so fond of saying? Oh yeah, ENJOY THE DECLINE!
Fools.
I mean, how much more proof do you to all need before you admit that you're suckers? No problem arguing that some things could be tweaked a bit but you have chosen the worst possible person for the job.
What is if some of you are so fond of saying? Oh yeah, ENJOY THE DECLINE!
Fools.
Bonerlover doesn’t have two nickels to rub together yet she pretends to be a world economic expert.Bonelover and his leftist allies have no clue how our financial/economic system works.
It's evident from their comments.
Their utter ignorance is tiresome.