I want a Les Paul

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bob Savage
  • Start date Start date
Bob Savage":1j10ennm said:
What's a GT?

Sounds like you might be in the market for an LP. :)

Yeah I might be, go figure :lol: :LOL:

And as jcj pointed out I'm not talking about the Vested Menace known as Geoff Tate but Gold Top. I think the finish was brushed GT actually, or am I confusing it with another LP finish... :confused:
 
Ahhh... GOLD TOP! It's obvious I'm not worthy of an LP since I couldn't figure that out.
 
Bob Savage":2sm8v57p said:
Ahhh... GOLD TOP! It's obvious I'm not worthy of an LP since I couldn't figure that out.

Now now Bob, anyone could've been fooled.
 
Historic's are Gibson USA Custom Shop recreations of original (closer than production models but not 100% spot on as the originals) R8 is plain top 1958 standard model, R9 a flametop 1959, R7 a 57 Custom etc etc.

I wouldnt concern myself too much with chambering if the guitar has sweet tone. I prefer heavier guitars but I like mahogany/maple top bodies. A lot of the historics are chambered (bigtime) and come in around 8-9 lbs. Some of the modern weight relieved 2012 standards weigh ovev 9 lbs. My traditional with the old school swiss cheese weight relief weighs 9.6. The new 2012 trads have no weight relief and are weighing in the same 9-10lb range. Its the density of the wood ;)

I also say buy used to save some money. I couldnt find a used R8 for 2k when I bought one but they do pop up from time to time. I bought my trad + used when they were $2200+ out the door in stores, I got it for it $1875 shipped. I took a gamble buying with out playing but felt at the time I got a good enough deal I could easily get my money back if I didn't like it so the risk was minimal but the reward was great ;) I kept it. If you buy online (you have more options) find a retailer who has a return policy.
 
Schaf":lmwoj8y0 said:
Have Chris Snyder send you one of his. He doesn't need it. He's playing drums. I tried to get him to send them to me while they weren't in use, but he didn't think it was a good idea. As a matter of fact, he didn't even think it was funny. :lol: :LOL: Believe it or not, Chris and I grew up in the same town. And, he knows a bunch about LP's.

Heh! Chris said to find a nice LP Studio and save my cash for other things. Hmmm...

Shawn Lutz":lmwoj8y0 said:
Historic's are Gibson USA Custom Shop recreations of original (closer than production models but not 100% spot on as the originals) R8 is plain top 1958 standard model, R9 a flametop 1959, R7 a 57 Custom etc etc.

I wouldnt concern myself too much with chambering if the guitar has sweet tone. I prefer heavier guitars but I like mahogany/maple top bodies. A lot of the historics are chambered (bigtime) and come in around 8-9 lbs. Some of the modern weight relieved 2012 standards weigh ovev 9 lbs. My traditional with the old school swiss cheese weight relief weighs 9.6. The new 2012 trads have no weight relief and are weighing in the same 9-10lb range. Its the density of the wood ;)

I also say buy used to save some money. I couldnt find a used R8 for 2k when I bought one but they do pop up from time to time. I bought my trad + used when they were $2200+ out the door in stores, I got it for it $1875 shipped. I took a gamble buying with out playing but felt at the time I got a good enough deal I could easily get my money back if I didn't like it so the risk was minimal but the reward was great ;) I kept it. If you buy online (you have more options) find a retailer who has a return policy.

Yeah, $2k is definitely higher than I want to go. I'm really concerned about buying something sight unseen so what I'll probably do is hit up a bunch of shops in LA and find something that rocks my world.

So you're saying the 2012 trads have no weight relief? Not even chambering? That's definitely not what I've found in my reading online. Really, I don't care about weight relief or chambering if the guitar is a good one, but nonetheless the weight relief/chambering topic is a very confusing one, and obviously one with a lot of misinformation out there because you get different stories depending on who you ask. Glad it doesn't matter much to me...
 
Yeah Bob.....I too wanted to love a Les Paul. Did the merry go round like Jcj did 3 times....But I owned 10 of them and just didnt gel. I am a glutton for punishment I suppose. Super strats all the way for me. :D
 
Mailman1971":398m3lrv said:
Yeah Bob.....I too wanted to love a Les Paul. Did the merry go round like Jcj did 3 times....But I owned 10 of them and just didnt gel. I am a glutton for punishment I suppose. Super strats all the way for me. :D

Well, I owned a black custom (pretty sure it was a custom) around 81/82, so I figure it's time to try it out again.
 
Bob Savage":28r9erfm said:
Mailman1971":28r9erfm said:
Yeah Bob.....I too wanted to love a Les Paul. Did the merry go round like Jcj did 3 times....But I owned 10 of them and just didnt gel. I am a glutton for punishment I suppose. Super strats all the way for me. :D

Well, I owned a black custom (pretty sure it was a custom) around 81/82, so I figure it's time to try it out again.
Oh Cool. I feel ya on this. I go back and forth with wanting to get another SG. Had a few of them thru the years. Angus one of my inspirations....yet when I play them.....neck just feels too thick/heavy for the guitar. They never stick around long. But I still want another one. :lol: :LOL:
 
What probably has most people freaked about gibson weight relief is that when they weight relieve a guitar, they drill plugs out of it:

1998LPstandardradiograph.jpg


And if it's chambered, then it's more like this:

heritageguitarfan_com_photos_GibsonDarkFireLesPaulChamberedBody.jpg.png


I have a PRS and three Tom Andersons that are Chambered - great guitars, very light, and the attack is compressed a bit. I dig em! I think my Les Pauls are both weight relieved, doesn't bother me but I didn't pay extra on those like I did on the Andersons for chambering. I'd be pissed if I paid a premium for chambering and some guy was taking a saw used to cut doorknob holes into a guitar body before a lam top was glued on.
 
Wow......never knew that Pete. Thanks for posting that. :thumbsup:
I think I would rather it be body heavy then the neck always seeming to want to slant down as in the SG's.
The Pauls I had always seemed nicely balanced though.
 
Right now, I have five Gibsons - A Les Paul Faded Standard, A Les Paul Traditional Pro, a SG standard silverburst w/ebony board, a SG faded, and a Les Paul P90 Special.

...I'm digging the P90 Les Paul special the most, and it was the cheapest of all of them. Best $500 I ever spent. Check one out Bob, you might be surprised. I think the price has gone back up but you can find em some places with P90s or humbuckers for under $700. I'd rather have one of these ANY day over a Les Paul studio.

602573_4198415117856_1297222648_n.jpg
 
stratotone":1xusjezv said:
What probably has most people freaked about gibson weight relief is that when they weight relieve a guitar, they drill plugs out of it:

1998LPstandardradiograph.jpg


And if it's chambered, then it's more like this:

heritageguitarfan_com_photos_GibsonDarkFireLesPaulChamberedBody.jpg.png


I have a PRS and three Tom Andersons that are Chambered - great guitars, very light, and the attack is compressed a bit. I dig em! I think my Les Pauls are both weight relieved, doesn't bother me but I didn't pay extra on those like I did on the Andersons for chambering. I'd be pissed if I paid a premium for chambering and some guy was taking a saw used to cut doorknob holes into a guitar body before a lam top was glued on.

Check out what they started in 2012: http://www2.gibson.com/News-Lifestyle/F ... -2012.aspx

The swiss cheese method doesn't exactly seem well thought out but it leaves a lot of material behind so I wouldn't be concerned about buying one like that.

stratotone":1xusjezv said:
Right now, I have five Gibsons - A Les Paul Faded Standard, A Les Paul Traditional Pro, a SG standard silverburst w/ebony board, a SG faded, and a Les Paul P90 Special.

...I'm digging the P90 Les Paul special the most, and it was the cheapest of all of them. Best $500 I ever spent. Check one out Bob, you might be surprised. I think the price has gone back up but you can find em some places with P90s or humbuckers for under $700. I'd rather have one of these ANY day over a Les Paul studio.

I'm going to do some recording with my P90 loaded Viper this weekend. I do want a humbucker LP but that special looks awesome.

jcj":1xusjezv said:
sah5150":1xusjezv said:
I want one of these now:

[/img]

Steve

Those are NICE!

Big time!
 
Bob Savage":3pb10pm8 said:
Schaf":3pb10pm8 said:
Have Chris Snyder send you one of his. He doesn't need it. He's playing drums. I tried to get him to send them to me while they weren't in use, but he didn't think it was a good idea. As a matter of fact, he didn't even think it was funny. :lol: :LOL: Believe it or not, Chris and I grew up in the same town. And, he knows a bunch about LP's.

Heh! Chris said to find a nice LP Studio and save my cash for other things. Hmmm...

Shawn Lutz":3pb10pm8 said:
Historic's are Gibson USA Custom Shop recreations of original (closer than production models but not 100% spot on as the originals) R8 is plain top 1958 standard model, R9 a flametop 1959, R7 a 57 Custom etc etc.

I wouldnt concern myself too much with chambering if the guitar has sweet tone. I prefer heavier guitars but I like mahogany/maple top bodies. A lot of the historics are chambered (bigtime) and come in around 8-9 lbs. Some of the modern weight relieved 2012 standards weigh ovev 9 lbs. My traditional with the old school swiss cheese weight relief weighs 9.6. The new 2012 trads have no weight relief and are weighing in the same 9-10lb range. Its the density of the wood ;)

I also say buy used to save some money. I couldnt find a used R8 for 2k when I bought one but they do pop up from time to time. I bought my trad + used when they were $2200+ out the door in stores, I got it for it $1875 shipped. I took a gamble buying with out playing but felt at the time I got a good enough deal I could easily get my money back if I didn't like it so the risk was minimal but the reward was great ;) I kept it. If you buy online (you have more options) find a retailer who has a return policy.

Yeah, $2k is definitely higher than I want to go. I'm really concerned about buying something sight unseen so what I'll probably do is hit up a bunch of shops in LA and find something that rocks my world.

So you're saying the 2012 trads have no weight relief? Not even chambering? That's definitely not what I've found in my reading online. Really, I don't care about weight relief or chambering if the guitar is a good one, but nonetheless the weight relief/chambering topic is a very confusing one, and obviously one with a lot of misinformation out there because you get different stories depending on who you ask. Glad it doesn't matter much to me...

no, 2013's sorry that is a typo...I own a 2012 ;) The 2013 Traditionals are supposed to be "solid" meaning no weight relief. all 2012 Traditionals have swiss cheese holes. The 2012 Standard has the new modern chambering.
 
Shawn Lutz":1xhslvze said:
no, 2013's sorry that is a typo...I own a 2012 ;) The 2013 Traditionals are supposed to be "solid" meaning no weight relief. all 2012 Traditionals have swiss cheese holes. The 2012 Standard has the new modern chambering.

Ah, gotcha. I like that modern chambering but don't know whether it's completely replaced the other type of chambering nor have I found out whether they're sticking with that method. I think it looks far more well thought out even over the standard chambering they were using.
 
Back
Top