Iran war thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shevek
  • Start date Start date
Shevek

Shevek

Well-known member
1785557844911.jpeg
 
Robostyle said:
Really?
Was that before or after you were calling him a degenerate alcoholic every 5 minutes?
Fucking liar.
Click to expand...
It's funny how these libtards will constantly attack you with depraved insults. Then if you happen to agree with one of their TDS criticisms suddenly they act like your BFF.

MoreHassle did the same thing with shithead Dan. He shat all over him until Dan started agreeing with the Jew hate. Then all of a sudden he's hanging on Dan's nuts calling him the smartest guy on the forum.

It's all a damn grift to fuel their TDS and hatred.
 

Trump cancels planned attack on Iran​

The US president said the outlines of a deal had been agreed that could reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

The US and Israel had been preparing a major bombing campaign against the Islamic Republic’s energy infrastructure that could begin as early as the weekend. The network said the proposed operation, which it described as potentially one of the harshest campaigns against Iran to date, was expected to target power plants and oil refineries, while military officials also reportedly discussed cutting electricity across Tehran.

In a post on Truth Social on Saturday, Trump wrote that despite the US being “locked and loaded” to strike Iran at “levels of Military Terror, Strength, and Power not seen since World War II,” he had agreed to requests from Tehran and Middle Eastern nations to hold off on the attack because the “parameters” of a deal had been agreed upon.

Trump said the proposed agreement would include “the Immediate, Complete, and Total OPENING OF THE HORMUZ STRAIT, and an end to Iran’s nuclear threat.”

“Based on this request, I have agreed, for the future benefit of the WORLD and, likewise, the survival of a successful and prosperous Iran, to cancel the attack, subject to being able to rapidly make a DEAL,” Trump wrote, adding that Israel had joined Washington in the commitment.

Iranian officials, however, disputed Trump’s account. A source described by the Fars News Agency as being close to Iran’s negotiating team said there were no plans to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and insisted it would remain closed “as long as the US continues its hostile actions.” According to the source, commercial shipping would only be permitted through a route designated by Iran and with the permission of the IRGC Navy.

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the kingdom’s de facto leader, reportedly spoke to Trump on Saturday and raised concerns about a further escalation. A source familiar with the conversation told AP that Riyadh feared US attacks on Tehran’s key infrastructure could prompt retaliatory strikes against energy facilities in Gulf countries. The crown prince also reportedly sought clarity about the military action Trump was considering.

A White House official, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed to AP that the conversation had taken place but did not disclose any details.

Despite joining the US in strikes on sites used by alleged Iran-aligned militias in Iraq, Saudi Arabia has reportedly been urging Washington and Tehran to resume negotiations to end the five-month-old conflict. Saudi Defense Minister Khalid bin Salman, the crown prince’s brother, traveled to Washington on Wednesday for meetings with Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance to discuss Iran strategy.
 
NoHassle said:

Trump cancels planned attack on Iran​

The US president said the outlines of a deal had been agreed that could reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

The US and Israel had been preparing a major bombing campaign against the Islamic Republic’s energy infrastructure that could begin as early as the weekend. The network said the proposed operation, which it described as potentially one of the harshest campaigns against Iran to date, was expected to target power plants and oil refineries, while military officials also reportedly discussed cutting electricity across Tehran.

In a post on Truth Social on Saturday, Trump wrote that despite the US being “locked and loaded” to strike Iran at “levels of Military Terror, Strength, and Power not seen since World War II,” he had agreed to requests from Tehran and Middle Eastern nations to hold off on the attack because the “parameters” of a deal had been agreed upon.

Trump said the proposed agreement would include “the Immediate, Complete, and Total OPENING OF THE HORMUZ STRAIT, and an end to Iran’s nuclear threat.”

“Based on this request, I have agreed, for the future benefit of the WORLD and, likewise, the survival of a successful and prosperous Iran, to cancel the attack, subject to being able to rapidly make a DEAL,” Trump wrote, adding that Israel had joined Washington in the commitment.

Iranian officials, however, disputed Trump’s account. A source described by the Fars News Agency as being close to Iran’s negotiating team said there were no plans to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and insisted it would remain closed “as long as the US continues its hostile actions.” According to the source, commercial shipping would only be permitted through a route designated by Iran and with the permission of the IRGC Navy.

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the kingdom’s de facto leader, reportedly spoke to Trump on Saturday and raised concerns about a further escalation. A source familiar with the conversation told AP that Riyadh feared US attacks on Tehran’s key infrastructure could prompt retaliatory strikes against energy facilities in Gulf countries. The crown prince also reportedly sought clarity about the military action Trump was considering.

A White House official, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed to AP that the conversation had taken place but did not disclose any details.

Despite joining the US in strikes on sites used by alleged Iran-aligned militias in Iraq, Saudi Arabia has reportedly been urging Washington and Tehran to resume negotiations to end the five-month-old conflict. Saudi Defense Minister Khalid bin Salman, the crown prince’s brother, traveled to Washington on Wednesday for meetings with Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance to discuss Iran strategy.
Click to expand...
Uh huh. I definitely believe him this time, lol.
 
The New York Times reports the U.S. dropped a 2,000-pound bomb on a family home in Iran, killing a husband, wife, and their 2-year-old son. The paper found no indication of a nearby military target.
1785682008820.jpeg
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Geo
This ceasefire/"deal" is just here because republican rating is tanking....they'll make a "deal," the economy will improve, people will vote in these rat fuck worthless GOP shitbags again and then it's back to war.
This is what happened on the 4th.
 
Interpreter needed for Grandpa! One fluent in Bing Bing Bing.

FB_IMG_1785719513803.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
U.S. will need years to replenish stockpiles of advanced weapons used in Iran war, new analysis finds
3 4 5
Replies
95
Views
3K
Picasso
Picasso
Shevek
A good analysis of the Iran War
Replies
7
Views
614
MadAsAHatter
MadAsAHatter
D
Exclusive Politics Trump visited soldiers at Walter Reed — but not the 14 injured in the Iran war
Replies
8
Views
298
84superchamp
84superchamp
D
US gas prices back up to an average of $4 a gallon as Iran war heats up
2 3
Replies
45
Views
1K
Shevek
Shevek
D
U.S. gasoline prices rise 50% since the start of the Iran war
2 3 4
Replies
61
Views
2K
84superchamp
84superchamp
Back
Top