It didnt work.

  • Thread starter Thread starter shar-vell Dan
  • Start date Start date
JDs Couch said:
Nowhere near weapons grade, and they weren't working towards it. Tulsi said so in March.
Click to expand...
According to the IAEA the highest level, only justifiable in rare cases for civilian use, is 20%.

It's normally 3 ->5% for civil use, sometimes 10% - energy production, research and medicinal purposes.

In this light, saying there's nothing to see here in the case of 60% is, well...

JDs Couch said:
Yet none of you brilliant gents can provide a shred of evidence that Iran was making a weapon, and your own intelligence agency said they weren't...
Continue with the baseless ad hominem, it's all you've got.
Click to expand...
A while back I heard that 43 intelligence agencies around the world were 100% convinced that it's been running a programme for a long time now; the evidence gathered independently and via satellite surveillance is beyond-question according to them.
 
Monkey Man said:
According to the IAEA the highest level, only justifiable in rare cases for civilian use, is 20%.

It's normally 3 ->5% for civil use, sometimes 10% - energy production, research and medicinal purposes.

In this light, saying there's nothing to see here in the case of 60% is, well...


A while back I heard that 43 intelligence agencies around the world were 100% convinced that it's been running a programme for a long time now; the evidence gathered independently and via satellite surveillance is beyond-question according to them.
Click to expand...
Gabbard: Iran did not restart nuclear weapons program
June 19, 2025 | 12:44 PM PDT
Director of National Intelligence nominee Tulsi Gabbard on March 25 testified that Iran had not restarted a nuclear weapons program it halted in 2003.
 
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said at a March hearing that based on intelligence, Iran was not building a nuclear weapon and had not authorized building one,
 
JDs Couch said:
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said at a March hearing that based on intelligence, Iran was not building a nuclear weapon and had not authorized building one,
Click to expand...
Thanks for the service and informative news as always JDsCoochie :LOL:
 
JDs Couch said:
Gabbard: Iran did not restart nuclear weapons program
June 19, 2025 | 12:44 PM PDT
Director of National Intelligence nominee Tulsi Gabbard on March 25 testified that Iran had not restarted a nuclear weapons program it halted in 2003.
Click to expand...
So now you think Gabbard is not only competent but is a nuclear expert ?
 
Bad Brain said:
I don't really get the hysteria about Iran having a nuke. It is just hype to justify a war of aggression by Israel/US in order to maintain dominance in the region.
Click to expand...
So every other country in the world is in on the Israeli plot to take over the Middle East ? Egypt, UAE, etc.

And you wonder why no one takes anything you say about Israel seriously.
 
Monkey Man said:
The only country ever to threaten repeatedly to use it the first chance it gets?

Yeah, can't imagine why anyone would be concerned about that.
Click to expand...
Well I've been attempting to make the point that rhetoric vs reality are separate. Set the words aside and look at the reality: the only country in the world to have used nukes (on civilian populations no less) and it's proxy took part in a war of aggression, illegal under the UN charter and international law. Who is the true threat?
 
Monkey Man said:
A while back I heard that 43 intelligence agencies around the world were 100% convinced that it's been running a programme for a long time now; the evidence gathered independently and via satellite surveillance is beyond-question according to them.
Click to expand...
I've also heard rumors that Iran actually already has nukes via china. And Pakistan (Another Muslim country for you islamaphobes) has apparently vowed to give Iran nukes if Iran is nuked.
 
Iran already has a self-imposed religiously based prohibition against nukes since 2003, although I understand that stance is shifting. I think they have been capable of making nuclear weapons the whole time, but refrained due to a desire to get along with the west. Guess that idea is out the window!
 
Monkey Man said:
The only country ever to threaten repeatedly to use it the first chance it gets?

Yeah, can't imagine why anyone would be concerned about that.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I agree. Not only did they outright say they would use one, they have made it known over and over again that they will not stop until "Death to Western Civilization"....because religion. If one dies killing a Western person, they automatically go to their version of heaven. That's how I understand it anyway. Jannah?.

So yeah, we dropped some atomic bombs on Japan and we should feel bad about that - I get it. But Japan, at the time, was not willing to surrender. They made it clear that they would rather keep dying off fighting or commit suicide (similar reasons as above I imagine) than to surrender. So what were we supposed to do @Bad Brain ? Keep sending our men out to the western Pacific while we kept making body bags and caskets? When the time came, we gave Japan plenty of notice of what we were going to do and they didn't listen. We did it. They didn't surrender. We told them we were going to do it again. They didn't listen. We did it again. They surrendered. :dunno:

That, and I don't see the United States as using nuclear weapons to proactively kill civilians in other nations to start a war. Or to go and take land from others using nukes (read in the context of 2025 and nuclear weapons - not what happened to Native American Indians - which was shitty).

I could be wrong. I've been wrong before.

We have the technology in these new bunker busters that we can be very strategic and hit targets with the least amount of collateral damage.
 
Last edited:
JDs Couch said:
Gabbard: Iran did not restart nuclear weapons program
June 19, 2025 | 12:44 PM PDT
Director of National Intelligence nominee Tulsi Gabbard on March 25 testified that Iran had not restarted a nuclear weapons program it halted in 2003.
Click to expand...


apu-thank-you.gif
 
Bad Brain said:
I've also heard rumors that Iran actually already has nukes via china. And Pakistan (Another Muslim country for you islamaphobes) has apparently vowed to give Iran nukes if Iran is nuked.
Click to expand...
If Iran is nuked, there won't be many left to accept foreign nukes. :D
 
Bad Brain said:
Well I've been attempting to make the point that rhetoric vs reality are separate. Set the words aside and look at the reality: the only country in the world to have used nukes (on civilian populations no less) and it's proxy took part in a war of aggression, illegal under the UN charter and international law. Who is the true threat?
Click to expand...
Not to mention, the only country to have secret illegal nuclear weapons in the region is the rogue state of Israel, who is waging war on basically all it's neighbors.
 
Great
311boogieman said:
Trump said when asked that he "doesn't care what she thinks".

My hunch is that she was compiling and reviewing watered down or doctored facts - but I have nothing to back that up.
Click to expand...
Great judge of character then. Why hire her if he thinks so little of her?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top