Mesa Dual Recto Comparison - Rev C, Rev F, and Rev G

  • Thread starter Thread starter NewWorldMan
  • Start date Start date
slyym":2a81cpxn said:
Sounds like an eq in the loop could make all these sound pretty similar. I like the c and f the best but ain’t a damn thing wrong with the g.

You can certainly get them damn close just by turning knobs, let alone with an EQ. At least on Channel 2/Modern.
 
Some may call it crazy, but I’ve always liked the Rev G the most. Especially the Trem-o-Verb. The tremolo was nothing special compared to other amps but it had a certain greatness to it in the blues mode and the clean I felt was better than standard Rev G heads. Wish I still had one, maybe I should shop around.
 
Newworldman, have you even played the multi watt? If so, where does that fall in the mix?
 
fearhk213":jehc6i1v said:
Newworldman, have you even played the multi watt? If so, where does that fall in the mix?

I had a Dual Recto MW for a few years and it was a fine amp, but it needed some serious volume to sound good. In low to medium volume there was this strange hollowness in mids that I was not very fond of. But when I put some serious volume it sounded great, full and tight. I have rev F now and could not be happy more. It sounds full even on low volume and takes boosts like a champ. The multiwatt was maybe a bit more aggressive and dry but rev F is more juicier sounding and fun to play for me. Both amps are great and I woud be happy with either of them.
 
fearhk213":1ejz1mmv said:
Newworldman, have you even played the multi watt? If so, where does that fall in the mix?

I have, but it's been a while. They're the Rectos I've spent the least amount of time with. The one I had was pretty cool. I have a buddy that owns one and really likes it. I should borrow it and do a quick clip with it as well.
 
RyeDaddy":30d61iur said:
Some may call it crazy, but I’ve always liked the Rev G the most. Especially the Trem-o-Verb. The tremolo was nothing special compared to other amps but it had a certain greatness to it in the blues mode and the clean I felt was better than standard Rev G heads. Wish I still had one, maybe I should shop around.

I definitely don't think it's crazy. I've used Rev G more than any other since the '90s.
 
strungout82":2bg5vs00 said:
I have rev F now and could not be happy more. It sounds full even on low volume and takes boosts like a champ. The multiwatt was maybe a bit more aggressive and dry but rev F is more juicier sounding and fun to play for me. Both amps are great and I woud be happy with either of them.

I think the 2 channels in general sound better than the 3 channels at lower volumes. Once the power amp kicks in, it all comes out in the wash, but for lower volume playing, I do think the 2 channels have an edge.
 
I own a Rev F that had what appeared to be the original coke bottle 420 6L6's in it - amp sounded fantastic with those tubes and thought it sounded better than almost any modern rock/metal amp. Noticed it was sounding a bit squishy last week, then put in a fresh set of Mesa 6L6's and it sounds even better, bolder, more aggressive. With a boost in front it's gotta be one of the best amps I've ever heard for what I like. Good comparison video BTW, another good Recto is the TremoVerb - essentially a Rev G with maybe a hair more gain.
 
UberschallEL34":d0074smz said:
I own a Rev F that had what appeared to be the original coke bottle 420 6L6's in it - amp sounded fantastic with those tubes and thought it sounded better than almost any modern rock/metal amp. Noticed it was sounding a bit squishy last week, then put in a fresh set of Mesa 6L6's and it sounds even better, bolder, more aggressive. With a boost in front it's gotta be one of the best amps I've ever heard for what I like. Good comparison video BTW, another good Recto is the TremoVerb - essentially a Rev G with maybe a hair more gain.

The 420s are my favorite power tubes for Rectos. Their lifespan isn't as good as a lot of modern tubes, so unfortunately a lot of the used ones out there are pretty worn. I was fortunate enough to buy a large NOS stash a while back (8 or 9 quads new in box), plus have accumulated a lot of other good ones over the years.
 
the ones I had in there still sounded good, but definitely were older...I got the amp used at GC so I wasn't sure but as dusty as the chassis was inside, I assumed they were possibly original. The preamp tubes also looked to be original so I put a couple newer HG tubes in there. It's just a fantastic amp.
 
UberschallEL34":2rswcgsy said:
the ones I had in there still sounded good, but definitely were older...I got the amp used at GC so I wasn't sure but as dusty as the chassis was inside, I assumed they were possibly original. The preamp tubes also looked to be original so I put a couple newer HG tubes in there. It's just a fantastic amp.

Which version Uber do you have, and how do you like it compared to the Recto? I've got an Original/Rev 1. I got it assuming there would be a lot of cross over in the ground they cover, and it in some ways there is. But, they're most distinct from each other than I assumed they would be.
 
Other than both being geared towards higher gain, they're pretty different. I have the Rev Blue. The personality of the 2 are their own thing...but again, high gain for some is high gain. To me the Uber low end is a little fuller than the Recto. I think they're different enough in voicing to have both...
 

Similar threads

ZEN Amps
Replies
19
Views
632
Beyond Black
Beyond Black
ultimatemetalguitartones
Replies
42
Views
1K
ultimatemetalguitartones
ultimatemetalguitartones
cardinal
Replies
14
Views
1K
saxxamafone
saxxamafone
ultimatemetalguitartones
Replies
0
Views
123
ultimatemetalguitartones
ultimatemetalguitartones
Back
Top