Heritage Softail":3k56ibnu said:
petejt":3k56ibnu said:
D-Rock":3k56ibnu said:
The D60 is tight and aggressive, bit mot very compressed or saturated. It can be dialed in for a mid gain tone that cuts like a mother. Emphasizing on crunch and clarity.
Then an amp like the Fireball would handle the saturation, lowend thump and liquid sustaining gain. Just throwing a curve ball at ya,
That's sort of what like I'm trying to achieve by blending a Marshall JCM 800 with a Mesa/Boogie MarkIV.
The tricky thing though is that I also want this deep growling undercurrent, underneath a searing punching aggressive high gain crunch. And a lot of low end chug. And articulation and definition.
This is what is on so many recordings as I hear it.
I hear it too. It's what makes so many of those guitar tones so thick.
But yet a lot of two-guitarist bands get the same effect when performing live. Say Metallica for instance- Kirk's guitar always had/has a more 'squawky' guitar sounnd (spike in the central mids and upper mids), while James' sound was more rounded and filled out on the lower mids, while having more of the upper mid-top end crunch. It's a little different now though.
Heritage Softail":3k56ibnu said:
Lugo did an amp mix demo and many people liked the Marshall Recto mix. Cantrell does the same thing with Angry and Pissed, upper and lower midrange focus.
I've always wondered if that was part of the chemistry of Adam Jones' sound- where he pairs the Diezel VH4 with the Marshall Super Bass.
That reminds me of a comment Kirk Hammett said about recording his guitar tracks in 1990- he split the signal and sent the lows and mids to his Bradshaw rack preamp with the VHT poweramp, and sent the highs to a pair of Marshall Plexi amps.
Heritage Softail":3k56ibnu said:
I bought a DSL100 just to pair with my TJ or MKIIC. It really does seem to create some width. To my ears, I can hear the separation of the amps because they don't step on each others focal frequencies, but together is is a wall of wide sound.
But after all that, someone else on here shared a more simple solution. Do wet dry and put an EQ in the loop of the wet amp to accomplish that same 'different focus' feeling. It worked pretty good. Quicker, easy, and you can just switch a couple cables to flip flop the master slave amps.
Another way is to use different combinations of speakers. I changed my MarkIV's amp settings today and also used two different speakers with it. I dialed it in so the graphic EQ scooped a lot of upper mids while boosting the bass and low mids. I cranked the 6.6kHz treble slider and presence so the top crunch would still be there. I then sent one speaker signal to a cab that had EV 12S 200 watt speakers and C90 speakers, and another cab with WGS ET-65 & C90s.
The cab with the EV/C90 combo sounds really gutsy and growly, while the ET-65 cab has a lot of the top end crunch and surprisingly heaps of upper mids- so much it's searing.
And to further complicate things- I threw in the chorus as well! The WGS cab is stereo, so actually receives a stereo chorus signal from the stereo poweramp (driven by the Slave Out of the MarkIV). It's quite sublime though so just thickens the texture nicely without getting washy and soupy, or that shrillness.
I dialed up the Marshall to have as low-middy a tone as possible (no presence, medium bass and mids, low treble), and set the gain at about halfway to keep it mildly clean. I goosed the front end with an overdrive pedal set with a low Tone. And then I sent it to the EV cab so that keeps it dark. It actually meshes quite well with the growly Boogie sound, and helps to balance the more upper-middy high sound from the WGS speakers. And I guess that's what gives the overall sound that width.
I guess this description sounds more perfect than it actually is! But it is close, and after lots of difficulty I am glad I got things working closer to what I want and hear in my head.