School me on the JVM410 and JVM205 heads

[angelspade]

I never really used the spring reverb in my DSL if I'm being honest. I liked having it though just because I thought it was cool.

I talked with my gear advisor at Sweetwater, and he spoke very highly of the JVM. But, he did say that it wouldn't really sound its best without an attenuator. That said, I'm definitely not buying attenuator, as my Mark IV for example sounds fantastic without one at low volumes. I'm damn sure the Marshall can sound good at lower volumes.

Anyway, I'm in the process of trying to sell my BE50. It's a tough market right now for sellers, and don't want to lose too much money on it. Can't really justify 3 amps (Mark IV, BE50, JVM410), so the BE50 makes the most sense to sell. Mark IV sounds too good to sell. I'll post an update later this winter or early Spring after I receive my amp and play through it for a few weeks.

While almost all tube amps respond well to some volume, I will tell you that the JVM sounds amazing at living room levels. The master volume is excellent. No need for an attenuator in my estimation.

 

[jasonP]

This 100%. I love having the 2 different OD channels. I live on OD2 for modern/death metal and love OD1 for soloing. The amp is so versatile it’s insane.

Same for me as well. I find that having 2 different OD channel voicings works so well! I find the OD2 Chanel to be tighter and more aggressive.

 

[jabps]

I never really used the spring reverb in my DSL if I'm being honest. I liked having it though just because I thought it was cool.

I talked with my gear advisor at Sweetwater, and he spoke very highly of the JVM. But, he did say that it wouldn't really sound its best without an attenuator. That said, I'm definitely not buying attenuator, as my Mark IV for example sounds fantastic without one at low volumes. I'm damn sure the Marshall can sound good at lower volumes.

Anyway, I'm in the process of trying to sell my BE50. It's a tough market right now for sellers, and don't want to lose too much money on it. Can't really justify 3 amps (Mark IV, BE50, JVM410), so the BE50 makes the most sense to sell. Mark IV sounds too good to sell. I'll post an update later this winter or early Spring after I receive my amp and play through it for a few weeks.

Man, you do not need an attenuator with the JVM. Of all the high gain heads I have owned it has arguably the best master volume. Sounds great at low volume playing. Per Santiago, the designer of the amp, cranking the Master to try and push the power amp section harder does not work on this amp, not designed that way.

 

[LanBaul]

OD1 is the Marshall side, OD2 leans Mesa. Biasing is doable, just less convenient

 

[BABMusic]

Well, I finally placed my order for the JVM410. One of the other younger store associates made a comment that I think was sarcasm by saying "that amp is a perfect bedroom volume amp". Well, if Marshall made a JVM410 50-watt, I woud much prefer that. Or even a DSL50 head. The store said there's a blemish on the vinyl, which I assume is the tolex, right? It's a b-stock item, but basically new. Should arrive later this week since it's already in my city. I'm going to give it at least 2-3 weeks to see how it sounds. If I find myself using OD2 more than OD1, I would just return it and get the JVM205. Was considering the Friedman Jose for a long time, but I think this amp is a safer buy for me. Although I'm sure I could sell the Jose, I think I would prefer the more options of the JVM and the more gain. Who knows -- maybe in a few years, I could get a Jose if I'm not pleased with the JVM. Just based on my past experience with the DSL, I think there's a high probability I will love the JVM.

 

[jchrisf]

Well, I finally placed my order for the JVM410. One of the other younger store associates made a comment that I think was sarcasm by saying "that amp is a perfect bedroom volume amp". Well, if Marshall made a JVM410 50-watt, I woud much prefer that. Or even a DSL50 head. The store said there's a blemish on the vinyl, which I assume is the tolex, right? It's a b-stock item, but basically new. Should arrive later this week since it's already in my city. I'm going to give it at least 2-3 weeks to see how it sounds. If I find myself using OD2 more than OD1, I would just return it and get the JVM205. Was considering the Friedman Jose for a long time, but I think this amp is a safer buy for me. Although I'm sure I could sell the Jose, I think I would prefer the more options of the JVM and the more gain. Who knows -- maybe in a few years, I could get a Jose if I'm not pleased with the JVM. Just based on my past experience with the DSL, I think there's a high probability I will love the JVM.

It sounds like yours is getting to you before mine gets to me. I'll be looking forward to hearing your initial thoughts while I am waiting.

 

[BABMusic]

It sounds like yours is getting to you before mine gets to me. I'll be looking forward to hearing your initial thoughts while I am waiting.

Were you the one who ordered the B-stock from Reverb's Musicians Friend? I had been watching for over a month this one listed on Reverb, and then I found out that it sold just before I could buy it. Fortunately, there's another one at the same price but it has slightly more blemishes. Assuming the blemish is on the tolex, I wouldn't care much about that.

 

[jchrisf]

Were you the one who ordered the B-stock from Reverb's Musicians Friend? I had been watching for over a month this one listed on Reverb, and then I found out that it sold just before I could buy it. Fortunately, there's another one at the same price but it has slightly more blemishes. Assuming the blemish is on the tolex, I wouldn't care much about that.

I was watching the one that was mint but my Sales Rep at MF made me an offer on a new one that came out about $80 more than that so I figured I just get a new one.

 

[BABMusic]

I was watching the one that was mint but my Sales Rep at MF made me an offer on a new one that came out about $80 more than that so I figured I just get a new one.

Man, I need a Musician's Friend Sales Rep. Thanks

 

[BABMusic]

I'm at home with a headache today, and my JVM arrived. I'll play it more later as I don't feel great right now, but I can already hear some very interesting differences from my Friedman BE50. The resonance control is not needed at low volume playing, at least to my ears. Gain is insane -- I often keep it at 4 or maybe 5.

 

[angelspade]

I'm at home with a headache today, and my JVM arrived. I'll play it more later as I don't feel great right now, but I can already hear some very interesting differences from my Friedman BE50. The resonance control is not needed at low volume playing, at least to my ears. Gain is insane -- I often keep it at 4 or maybe 5.

Congrats! Look forward to a full review brother.

 

[BABMusic]

Congrats! Look forward to a full review brother.

Will do. Right now, I'll just share that while the BE50 and JVM410 share the undeniable Marshall DNA, I find the JVM sounds better on the lower 3 strings (D, A, E) and the BE50 sounds better when playing the top 3 (E, B, G), especially when playing leads. Playing busy rhythm licks on the lower 3 strings on the JVM sounds thicker, smoother, and with an easier, graceful feel on my hands. It's kind of frustrating that both amps have this opposite experience. JVM takes my SD-1 better.