You know what's really embarrassing about this conflict? Iran has a 90 percent literacy rate while 50 per cent of the US reads at the 6th grade level or below. Iran sent Phds to the ceasefire talks. The US sent realtors.
You know what's even more embarrassing? Getting caught in another lie by using false equivalent statistics to push an anti-American agenda.
I'm not posting the charts and such because it'll clog the thread more that your TDS meme spamming. So I'll summarize...
While the numbers are correct as individual points they are in no way comparable to each other.
For Iran, the 90% (accurately 88.9%) encompasses all people with some form of literacy; termed absolute literate. This includes everyone from highly literate to functionally (but not totally) illiterate. The 11.1% left over are nonliterate; or absolute illiterate, not being able to read on any level.
The US statistic is 50% read below a 6th grade reading level which is low, but still considered functionally literate. Roughly 21% are considered functionally illiterate with 4% being nonliterate. On the opposite end 50% of Americans read at or above the average reading level.
So to compare apples to apples
And funnily enough I had to dig a bit to find more than the 90% absolute literacy rate for Iran; in some cases having to check it against raw population number statistics.
For US adults:
- 96% are absolute literate
- 50/50% average-above average and below average respectively
- 21% are functionally illiterate
- 4% are non literate/absolute illiterate
For Iranian adults:
- 88.9% absolute literate
- ?% average-above average and below average respectively - I was not able to find a statistic on the average literacy rate, but based on the other numbers the best case scenario would be 50% average-above average since 50% are considered functionally illiterate. In reality the number is likely much worse.
- 50% are functionally illiterate
- 11.1% are nonliterate/absolute illiterate
So when you break it down and make it comparable, Iranian literacy rates don't look so hot.
An interesting tidbit which I already sorta mentioned...
It was harder do find sources that broke Iranian literacy rates down past absolute literacy. In most cases the source material put a positive spin on any data or information given. I found minimal sources with a percentage given. In most cases numbers were listed by raw population; for example about 9 million adults being nonliterate (which equates to roughly 11%). That's an obvious attempt to attach positive spin and looks better than saying 11% of adults.
By contrast sources for US data broke numbers down and would highlight statistics that promoted a lower literacy rate of Americans. Sources would highlight the low and functionally illiterate numbers while not outright stating average and above average. Some sources did indicate average and above, but most would have to be inferred from the other numbers given. An obvious attempt to make things look worse than they are.