To all those asking about the LXII, there will be an official announcement regarding it sometime in the next couple of days. Suffice it to say that the GP/DI and the "other product" have had no effect on the LXII's development and release - they were simply ready to release earlier.
dirtyfunkg":84m8x61l said:
Paul, I actually commented on the Facebook page (my name is Gopal). I currently have a Sig:X, Pittbull Classic, a Mako Mak4, VHT FB-412, and a 2/90/2.
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but I see the GP/DI as all of the following--pardon the terminology if it isn't exactly correct, but it is a:
1. DI Box
2. Single channel preamp
3. 1W Power amp
4. Cab simulator
If any/all of those above utilities could be bypassed, that would be amazing.
First off, I'd add a series effects loop, which would make it possible to use the power section alone or to use it as a normal loop for effects. The preamp out already allows for using the unit as a preamp to feed an external power amp, which is great. I'd also love to be able to use the cab sim alone for monitoring in silent recording situations. As an example:
Recording a band live in the room:
/ DI section of GP/DI-->Interface
Guitar: Guitar--<
\VHT Pittbull Classic (power amp muted) or multichannel preamp(send or line out)-->GP/DI cab simulator-->Interface or headphone amp
The top/DI section is for reamping. The bottom is for monitoring through headphones, with all possibilities included without the constraints of a single channel amp.
I hope I'm making sense. Is it even possible?
Hey Gopal!
Unfortunately, the GP/DI doesn't work quite as discretely as that. The "power section" and "preamp section" are intrinsically linked, and have to be due to the way that the ~1w power section works. The small-triode-based power amp has fundamentally different design requirements and constraints than the typical large-pentode-based (or beam tetrode) power sections in most guitar amplifiers. This limitation would not just apply to the GP/DI, but to
any amplifier using a similar arrangement.
The fact is that an effects loop, in a traditional sense, wouldn't really work in the GP/DI. I wanted that feature, too, but when we were experimenting with it, there were simply too many compromises that had to be made to get it to work in a barely-satisfactory manner. The usual goal of an FX loop is to effect the signal post-gain, in order to keep the sound from getting muddy or indistinct from applying time-based effects to an input signal. The power section of the GP/DI is an integral part of the sound of the amp, and an FX loop would not be able to effectively serve this purpose - since the power amp would still be 'hit hard' by the sound of your delays or reverbs, and therefore still saturated, the loop would lose it's effectiveness.
Additionally, the "preamp out" of the GP/DI is a bit of a misnomer - it is actually the output of the
LOAD stage,
after the ~1w power amplifier. It simply bypasses the rest of the circuit ("Cab section" and the balancing circuitry) so that you can use it in a traditional pre-power-cab arrangement. It is not horribly dissimilar to the way the GP3 worked, but it has been significantly modified to make it both more effective and capable of operating as an independent amp.
As to being able to use the "Cab Section" independently of the rest of the GP/DI, that is also unfortunately not really feasible. It isn't really an "independent circuit" as such, but is actually dependent upon and interactive with the operation of the preceding stages. We can, and likely will, adapt the technology of the "Cab" into a more generalized product, but as it operates within the GP/DI, it is inseparable from the rest of the unit. That being said, the "preamp out"
does bypass the "Cab", and there will likely be another way to bypass it in the shipping unit (so you can use computer/other cab sims, if you like).
I know it is tempting to think of something like the GP/DI as a bunch of independent, discreet sections, but that really isn't the case. The whole amplifier has been designed to work together - it is a
complete system, not just a collection of features. However, we aren't infallible, and we may have forgotten something in the design. Please keep the feature suggestions coming!
Spaceboy":84m8x61l said:
Man this thing looks so sweet. Those metal tones could use some tweaking IMO but the features and price point are spot on.
If you want metal tones, get someone you know in LA to come help us out with them! It isn't that the GP/DI doesn't do them so much as that neither Steve nor I are capable of effectively playing in that kind of style. I know Fryette has a reputation as a "metal amp company", but believe it or not most of us really tend more towards classic rock and the cleaner end of things - I mean, I demo'd with a Gretsch and a Jazzmaster

!
The little monster is capable of the same range of tones as the Deliverance or Pittbull series - they all come from the same DNA, after all!