
se7en
Active member
RSRD":hwadjwpa said:se7en":hwadjwpa said:I found the XTC to be thicker than the Shiva....more width to the midrange. The Shiva has a more focused midrange by comparison. I would agree that the Shiva is angrier with the mode button engaged...That said, the XTC's red is definitely meaner than a 101b.
Thatsa good way to put it. the x has the squishier more compressed and forgiving tone whereas the Sheeves has a more RAW and in your face tone (with the mode button on). I just personally really like that raw 20th shiva tone the best of all. That said, I dont own a 20th X so maybe its a more raw, less forgiving amp then the 101s.
Yes, Shiva is more raw in a JCM800 kinda way. I'm more of a Plexi fan, as it's a richer and more versatile base, IMO. That's why I like the XTC and Browneye (Marsha). The XTC sounds huge, the Shiva was thinner in the bass and midrange and had a high end that was difficult for me to dial out. But, I'm super picky about that. The 20th X is indeed more raw and unforgiving than a 101. Much easier to dial in as well.