The Jews are trying to start WW III and guess who they'll want to fight it for them ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shar-vell Dan
  • Start date Start date
Floyd Eye said:
The German chancellor said , “Israel is doing the world’s dirty work” with Iran.

Pretty much a 180 from what they were all saying a couple months ago.
Click to expand...

Absolutely. I never thought I'd see events unfold like this. It's an amazing time to be alive.
 
Floyd Eye said:
My gut tells me we’ll at a minimum supply the heavy bombs to get the job done. Because I don’t see the mullahs giving in and I don’t see Israel stopping until Iran has no viable nuclear program.
Click to expand...
I mean short of direct American military involvement this is probably the next best option as the US already provides weapons to Isreal or provides weapons to Ukraine as well to defend it self.

If it was done with American oversight but not direct involvement, I dont see an issue with this but it still stands......


Your going to need more than one MOAB or a couple possibly to destroy the Fordo facility......... your going to have to be sure the Fordo facility is 100% destroyed and sure thats the only place they enrich plutonium/uranium...... if the Israelis do it with American oversight and not direct involvement I imagine all Americans ask is that they simply destroy the facilities with minimal collotareral damage.


Killing the Ayatollah or other military excursions beyond that would not be advised IMO.......


But in either case how long would it really push them back and when they aquire a nuke...... the situation will be made that much worse given what Israel prepares and is willing to do.



I mean its a tough one and I think its a viable option but I still feel the best option is to find a diplomatic approach and a peaceful long term solution vs bombing Iran. The best option and solution is diplomacy IMO with or without direct American military involvement.
 
The~Kid said:
I mean its a tough one and I think its a viable option but I still feel the best option is to find a diplomatic approach and a peaceful long term solution vs bombing Iran. The best option and solution is diplomacy IMO with or without direct American military involvement.
Click to expand...

I think a big part of the problem is that Iran's ruler's are theo-rats. Out and out fanatics who've brought so much darkness into the world for 46 years, all the while telling themselves that they're doing God's work on earth.

I don't have the answers. I just know that there are bad people with nukes in this world, and I don't want Iran added to that list. That's why I support Israel in the war.
 
JohnnyGtar said:
I think a big part of the problem is that Iran's ruler's are theo-rats. Out and out fanatics who've brought so much darkness into the world for 46 years, all the while telling themselves that they're doing God's work on earth.

I don't have the answers. I just know that there are bad people with nukes in this world, and I don't want Iran added to that list. That's why I support Israel in the war.
Click to expand...
I support Israel too....... but honestly IMO even with the option available for them by the US without American involvement to destroy the Fordo facility.......


IMO the best long term solution is a diplomatic one. At one point they are going to get a nuke and when that time comes an already bad situation in the future could be made worse by todays and tomorows actions......


IMO the Iranians will get a nuke at one point and its inevitable, simply bombing them and kicking the can down the road isnt the best option but I totally believe Israel should defend itself in either case....... I just dont see this as them defending themselves or promoting safety and stability for them or the region.



I mean Im 100% for Israel but IMO escalating the war is a mistake and it only makes the situation worse in the short term and the long term as well....... but if it were to be done providing Isreal the MOABs and delivery system with US oversight and no direct American military involvement is the best option for the President IMO if he were to go with an option......



But diplomacy, peace and coming to the table in this scenario IMO should be the main goal.
 
Last edited:
The strangest thing I've seen in all of this thread is that one of the resident extremists of conspiracies uses a spook operated browser/search engine. :ROFLMAO:
An actual function built on the back of google. The irony is hilariously astounding. Stay in school kids. Anyways, back to WW3.
 
The~Kid said:
I mean short of direct American military involvement this is probably the next best option as the US already provides weapons to Isreal or provides weapons to Ukraine as well to defend it self.

If it was done with American oversight but not direct involvement, I dont see an issue with this but it still stands......


Your going to need more than one MOAB or a couple possibly to destroy the Fordo facility......... your going to have to be sure the Fordo facility is 100% destroyed and sure thats the only place they enrich plutonium/uranium...... if the Israelis do it with American oversight and not direct involvement I imagine all Americans ask is that they simply destroy the facilities with minimal collotareral damage.


Killing the Ayatollah or other military excursions beyond that would not be advised IMO.......


But in either case how long would it really push them back and when they aquire a nuke...... the situation will be made that much worse given what Israel prepares and is willing to do.



I mean its a tough one and I think its a viable option but I still feel the best option is to find a diplomatic approach and a peaceful long term solution vs bombing Iran. The best option and solution is diplomacy IMO with or without direct American military involvement.
Click to expand...
Eliminate the crazy fucker at the top may be another way to stop their nuclear ambitions.
 
Looks like the pro-war necon faction is going to get their wish, Cruz confirms the US is supporting Israel in it's attacks.......The central bankers, international bankers are bringing the world to crisis and will use that crisis. All wars are bankers wars. The US will exceed 50 Trillion in Debt by 2030..... what's the interest on 50 Trillion? The US interest on 37 trillion already exceeds the entire DOD Pentagon budget for 2025.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnmauldin/2020/10/01/5-consequences-of-us-debt-at-50-trillion/

With the US set to breach the $50 trillion mark in debt by 2030, here are five things we should start thinking about sooner rather than later.


 
Last edited:
Yep, no more wars and quests for world domination be it by military might or by intrigue and not on our tax dollars. Help Americans first. Washington is tied at the hip to the war machine so no doubt it looks like we'll get sucked into greater involvement. "It'll be over in days". How'did Afghanistan work out? Iraq, twice? This is foolhardy globalism and we aren't on a spinning ball anyways. :LOL:
 
Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., told reporters on Wednesday that U.S. military intervention in Israel's operation would be "absolutely appropriate" to destroy Iranian nuclear facilities.

"I really think it's absolutely appropriate to use our capabilities to destroy the nuclear facilities in Iran," Fetterman said. "'The polling has shown that I think it's effectively 80% of Americans think that we should, Iran should never acquire a nuclear weapon. So like this isn't shocking, you know, it's like this is not warmongering, this is peace-mongering."

"I mean that's not controversial, it definitely shouldn't be controversial for Democrats," he added.
 
rsm said:
southern Italy, especially Sicily, are on the front line of invader boats from north Africa.
Click to expand...
What happened to Lampedusa is disgusting. Within three days they were invaded and their population more than doubled...




 
  • Like
Reactions: rsm
Floyd Eye said:
Eliminate the crazy fucker at the top may be another way to stop their nuclear ambitions.
Click to expand...
Yeah but the thing is, inevitably some other guy will take their place...... they will continue to work and develop a nuke..... then what..... lets say they do destroy the facility too...... its not the only one..... and they can always rebuild others..... so whens it going to stop.....


IMO this makes sense for some over the stretch of 2-3 years....... but over 5-10 years maybe sooner...... when Iran eventually develops a nuke..... whats the strategy then? What benefit will all this have for the US and Israel then..........


I think at this point the President should excercise whatever options he can with American oversight and no direct military involvement with discretion...... and Israel should do what it feels is in Israels best interests with help but no direct involvement by the US with discretion........


Its tricky to say what the best solution is and Israel has a right to do what it feels is best for Israel and America needs to be there for Israel.....


But IMO the best way to find a solution is at the table, over talks and a move towards long term peace vs war when it comes to the Middle East/Israel/Iran.
 
Last edited:
Things have cooled down as far as this week goes.......



1000002285.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top