
Shask
Well-known member
shgshg":1qtq1f04 said:Yeah but that's marketing. Most of the $$$ of a new Mesa Rectifier is the value of the Mesa logo on the front. On the inside a 2013 Dual Rectifier isn't significantly different from a 1993 Dual Rectifier. But a 2013 computer makes a 1993 computer look like a museum piece. That's the rollercoaster guitar gear is getting on, because a modeller like an Axe-FX isn't an amp - it's a COMPUTER.
Off the topic of Moore's Law for a sec, the biggest change that computers have undergone in the past twenty years isn't horsepower or features, it's usability. Compare a 386 running DOS in 1993 with an iPad today.
The Axe-FX is that 386 running DOS. I'd rather stab myself in the face than press buttons and turn a knob while looking at a chunky black-on-green monochrome LCD. When a modelling company takes the Axe-FX audio technology and puts a friendly interface on it, then I'll be interested.
Actually, now that I think about it, it's far more likely that someone will just write a better modelling app for the iPad and we'll start seeing iPads in XLR-equipped docking stations sitting on top of power amps.
Uhhh. NO. A single part for that amp, a 12AX7 costs like $17 or so. I could buy THE SAME EXACT TUBE 10 years ago for $7. Its not marketing, it is inflation..
Something we can agree on..... concerts will be controlled by a table of iPads in the near future.