
Dan Gleesak
Well-known member
It’s cool, I can wait for you to google some stuff
My presumption is that those high water marks happened in a narrower time frame than current scientific thought suggests.
My presumption is that those high water marks happened in a narrower time frame than current scientific thought suggests.
Eh, maybe bible references, creation and great flood stuff. Actually there are dozens of flood narratives from many different cultures. I am a fan of prehistory but there isn't a lot of study materials. I like mystery so I guess it feeds that isomehow.Any reason for that?
Eh, maybe bible references, creation and great flood stuff. Actually there are dozens of flood narratives from many different cultures. I am a fan of prehistory but there isn't a lot of study materials. I like mystery so I guess it feeds that isomehow.
I've asked you however many times for references with specific evidence that support your belief. Instead you just keep repeating it over and over.What do you think is wrong with my guess?
So was that before or after Pangea in your opinion?I studied glacial formations quite intensively in college. Massachusetts is a great place to learn about them as we were basically completely formed by them. Evidence is everywhere.
Basically draw a line up from the Gulf of Mexico and most everything west of it was once an ocean.
I've asked you however many times for references with specific evidence that support your belief. Instead you just keep repeating it over and over.
Not my opinion, but from what I gathered it was around the time Pangea was breaking apartSo was that before or after Pangea in your opinion?
A google screen grab and graphs with no sources.And I told you to read a book, any book on the topic
But here are some photos if that is more your speed
View attachment 274194
View attachment 274197
View attachment 274200
Oh boy. You might need some remedial schooling son.What does co2 have to do with it?
Oh boy. You might need some remedial schooling son.
My feeling is all scientific and theological claims should have sources you can provide be they scientific or scriptural and church father's writings. I got on ol' denialist about some of that one day.So when does the debate start?
My feeling is all scientific and theological claims should have sources you can provide be they scientific or scriptural and church father's writings. I got on ol' denialist about some of that one day.
It doesn't really matter to me but it does to denialist. He's pretty hard nosed. I'm just chillin' and playing some Les Paul. My wife went jewelry shopping and I gotta new Shubb capo royale so the party is just begun.If I thought it actually mattered to you guys I would put in more effort.
Here is a good start though
https://sealevel.nasa.gov/faq/13/ho...level-rise-compare-to-that-over-the-previous/
https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/how-hurricanes-form.html