
Little B
Well-known member
I love my IV, III, and simul satellite head-runnin all 3 together..good tones!
I run r1 at about 5 and r2 and lead about 2 to 3, so yes this is normal, or at least my amp is similar in that way.TX6Strings":2x7lp9jj said:Do any of you have to run the volume on R1 higher than on R2 & R3 to keep up? With the Master on 3 I have to run R1 at 5 to match R2 & 3 at 1.5 or 2. I bought this amp used off a fellow rig talker a few years ago and am starting to wonder if maybe there's something wrong with it.
blackba":205y7hyh said:TX6Strings":205y7hyh said:blackba":205y7hyh said:Love my mark Iva. Have it for 13 years now. I even like r2 with a boost. Only quibble I have with it is that at lower volume, there is a volume drop and difference in feel when I engage the effects loop. I think that would go away if I could run the channel masters higher....
I had the same problem when running a DD6 and CE5 in the loop of my MKIV. I replaced them with a flashback and Chorona...problem solved!
So you went from 2 pedals with buffers to two true bypass pedals. Got it, I will try to cut the buffered pedals out and see if that helps....
blackba":3oo66y95 said:blackba":3oo66y95 said:TX6Strings":3oo66y95 said:blackba":3oo66y95 said:Love my mark Iva. Have it for 13 years now. I even like r2 with a boost. Only quibble I have with it is that at lower volume, there is a volume drop and difference in feel when I engage the effects loop. I think that would go away if I could run the channel masters higher....
I had the same problem when running a DD6 and CE5 in the loop of my MKIV. I replaced them with a flashback and Chorona...problem solved!
So you went from 2 pedals with buffers to two true bypass pedals. Got it, I will try to cut the buffered pedals out and see if that helps....
I tried bypassing all the pedals in the loop and still noticed a tone change, but it was less. I then tried raising the channel masters and noticed less of a change, but then the amp became hard to control at normal practice volumes. As I suspected, I will just have to live with this if I want to use the loop. I don't mind the tone change as long as I keep the loop on all the time, its when I kick the loop on and off that I get slightly annoyed with it. With the loop on, it sounds more dead and not as aggressive.
glassjaw7":2vkmonc8 said:My '05 IVB has been my main amp for a few years now. I consider selling it now and then and getting something like a Bogner (had an Ecstasy briefly and loved it) but there's something about the Mark that makes me hang on to it.
I've never had any trouble with the loop. I use a Carbon Copy or El Capistan in the loop and I really don't notice any tonal change when it's engaged, and I always notice "tone-suck" right away from loops. It's one of the better ones I've used.
blackba":34qk1pbd said:glassjaw7":34qk1pbd said:My '05 IVB has been my main amp for a few years now. I consider selling it now and then and getting something like a Bogner (had an Ecstasy briefly and loved it) but there's something about the Mark that makes me hang on to it.
I've never had any trouble with the loop. I use a Carbon Copy or El Capistan in the loop and I really don't notice any tonal change when it's engaged, and I always notice "tone-suck" right away from loops. It's one of the better ones I've used.
Mine is a mark IVA from 1990, so they may have changed the loop on the later rev B models. As I remember going from A to B, the R2 got more aggressive.
TX6Strings":1hrvlawa said:Do any of you have to run the volume on R1 higher than on R2 & R3 to keep up? With the Master on 3 I have to run R1 at 5 to match R2 & 3 at 1.5 or 2. I bought this amp used off a fellow rig talker a few years ago and am starting to wonder if maybe there's something wrong with it.