The Twitter Files

[Stripped Rights]

Its pure comedy, We never even speak of Trump on here.

Exactly! You guys never whine about how he lost. Never! Not once have I seen it.

 

[YabbaDabbaDoo]

They're trying to gaslight but failing miserably at it, as always Bless their hearts, these boys are in way over their heads.

I wasn't sure because I'm new, but what I now know is that you're a complete whack job. There was no gun hating and how do you factor Trump into this. This is what Dem cult members do all the time, they try and divert away, always, and you sir are doing that every time in your posts.
This is a real question, are you a paid FBI OR CIA troll for the left? Again, I'm being serious.

 

[YabbaDabbaDoo]

Exactly! You guys never whine about how he lost. Never! Not once have I seen it.

I can paste this here because it applies to you too.
I wasn't sure because I'm new, but what I now know is that you're a complete whack job. How do you factor Trump into this. This is what Dem cult members do all the time, they try and divert away, always, and you sir are doing that every time in your posts. This is a real question, are you a paid FBI OR CIA troll for the left? Again, I'm being serious.

 

[JackTheBear]

I wasn't sure because I'm new, but what I now know is that you're a complete whack job. There was no gun hating and how do you factor Trump into this. This is what Dem cult members do all the time, they try and divert away, always, and you sir are doing that every time in your posts.
This is a real question, are you a paid FBI OR CIA troll for the left? Again, I'm being serious.

So true?
To be honest, none of us ever talk about Trump on here. Election fraud, of course, but the only people talking specifically about Trump are the few tinfoil hat wearers who actually believe the election was true.


81M

 

[Stripped Rights]

I can paste this here because it applies to you too.
I wasn't sure because I'm new, but what I now know is that you're a complete whack job. How do you factor Trump into this. This is what Dem cult members do all the time, they try and divert away, always, and you sir are doing that every time in your posts. This is a real question, are you a paid FBI OR CIA troll for the left? Again, I'm being serious.

I was responding to JTB saying that the right wingers here never bring up Chump. I wasn't bringing up Chump trying to divert anything. I don't think I ever have done that but maybe.

Not from the FBI or CIA. I'm the illuminati.

 

[Monkey Man]

The question was directed towards CentristNutz mate.

Anyway, carry on. This banter is quite-entermataining.

 

[ccn]

In 2018 Jack Dorsey said “we certainly don’t shadow ban based on political viewpoints” – today it was confirmed that Dorsey was lying.​

https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-12-09-jack-dorsey-said-we-dont-shadow-ban.html

Elon Musk fires former FBI counsel James Baker for blocking release of “Twitter Files”​

https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-12-08-musk-fires-baker-blocking-release-twitter-files.html

 

[ccn]

I can paste this here because it applies to you too.
I wasn't sure because I'm new, but what I now know is that you're a complete whack job. How do you factor Trump into this. This is what Dem cult members do all the time, they try and divert away, always, and you sir are doing that every time in your posts. This is a real question, are you a paid FBI OR CIA troll for the left? Again, I'm being serious.

Never ever reply to stripped anus , that's what he desperately wants people to do and he will try to bait you into it . Don't fall for it just ignore him. He has the IQ equivalency of a Kellogg's Poptart.

 

[Stripped Rights]

The question was directed towards CentristNutz mate.

Anyway, carry on. This banter is quite-entermataining.

He quoted me though. Who was the statement aimed at?

You didn't quote anybody so who is your post directed towards?

 

[Monkey Man]

Standard etiquette that a post refers to the immediately-previous one unless stated otherwise.

Turns out we're both correct 'cause he quoted you in his next post and pasted the same response and question. I was referring to the first one, post #100, obviously.

Carry on bro'.

 

[Stripped Rights]

Never ever reply to stripped anus , that's what he desperately wants people to do and he will try to bait you into it . Don't fall for it just ignore him. He has the IQ equivalency of a Kellogg's Poptart.

If I liked to put people down due to my own insecurities I'd say sure I'm as smart as a Kellogg's poptart but you're only as intelligent as special K. SPeSHuLL. ?

Since I don't have the necessity to insult others, I won't.

 

[Stripped Rights]

Standard etiquette that a post refers to the immediately-previous one unless stated otherwise.

Turns out we're both correct 'cause he quoted you in his next post and pasted the same response and question. I was referring to the first one, post #100, obviously.

Carry on bro'.

Oh yes yes yes. I hadn't noticed his response to Cuntz. Now that you mention it, I see it's nearly identical to the one directed towards me. Just no mention of guns in post #101.

AFA etiquette goes, I usually try to quote the person that the response is directed towards because sometimes we end up with 2 or 3 people replying to a thread. Doesn't seem to happen here but it happens a lot on some other forums.

Thanks for the clarification bro.

 

[Monkey Man]

No worries bro'.

Actually, good forum etiquette is not to quote unnecessarily, hence there being no need if a response follows a post directly.

The exception would be if one's referring to a component that's not immediately-obvious due to its being buried within a lengthy post. In this case it makes sense to quote only that sentence or whatever.

If I'm responding to the last thing said in a post, I never quote; it's 100% redundant. In natural speech we don't repeat things this way and besides that it creates unnecessary clutter for readers.

 

[Monkey Man]

It goes without saying that these are highfalutin standards that I happen to follow.

I don't expect and will never instruct others to do this.

 

[CrazyNutz]

This is a real question, are you a paid FBI OR CIA troll for the left? Again, I'm being serious.

 

[YabbaDabbaDoo]

Thanks for your response and with that, you're confirming you're simply a whack job which I believe to be worse as you're possessing a rudderless brain.

 

[psychodave]

And none of what you say is exaggerated at all , the truth being revealed would completely destroy them. It's the ONLY reason the left is trying to destroy Musk . They have years and years invested in major lies and they relied on Twitter to keep those lies going which Twitter did . If any truth was posted that person would be banned immediately . The left now will continue to rely on Google, Facebook and the rest below:



The main stream media NEVER EVER TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT ANYTHING . They alter , delete , edit , omit and add wording to fit their narratives 100% of the time and have been doing so for decades .

This is why I truly hate the digital world. Things can be quietly edited to fit a narrative (left or right). You can eliminate the trail as well… or not even need to worry since it will probably go unnoticed. Super easy to change history to fit whomever is in charge. Book are a lot harder to “change.” We all have seen corrupt governments do massive book burnings to change the past, today it’s a simple a a few key strokes. Scary shit!

 

[CrazyNutz]

Thanks for your response and with that, you're confirming you're simply a whack job which I believe to be worse as you're possessing a rudderless brain.

 

[Picasso]

 

[harddriver]