The Twitter Files

  • Thread starter Thread starter Artjr
  • Start date Start date
YabbaDabbaDoo said:
I can paste this here because it applies to you too.
I wasn't sure because I'm new, but what I now know is that you're a complete whack job. How do you factor Trump into this. This is what Dem cult members do all the time, they try and divert away, always, and you sir are doing that every time in your posts. This is a real question, are you a paid FBI OR CIA troll for the left? Again, I'm being serious.
Click to expand...
Never ever reply to stripped anus , that's what he desperately wants people to do and he will try to bait you into it . Don't fall for it just ignore him. He has the IQ equivalency of a Kellogg's Poptart.
 
Monkey Man said:
The question was directed towards CentristNutz mate.

Anyway, carry on. This banter is quite-entermataining. :LOL:
Click to expand...
He quoted me though. Who was the statement aimed at?

You didn't quote anybody so who is your post directed towards? :LOL:
 
Standard etiquette that a post refers to the immediately-previous one unless stated otherwise.

Turns out we're both correct 'cause he quoted you in his next post and pasted the same response and question. I was referring to the first one, post #100, obviously.

Carry on bro'. :thumbsup:
 
ccn said:
Never ever reply to stripped anus , that's what he desperately wants people to do and he will try to bait you into it . Don't fall for it just ignore him. He has the IQ equivalency of a Kellogg's Poptart.
Click to expand...
If I liked to put people down due to my own insecurities I'd say sure I'm as smart as a Kellogg's poptart but you're only as intelligent as special K. SPeSHuLL. ?

Since I don't have the necessity to insult others, I won't.
 
Monkey Man said:
Standard etiquette that a post refers to the immediately-previous one unless stated otherwise.

Turns out we're both correct 'cause he quoted you in his next post and pasted the same response and question. I was referring to the first one, post #100, obviously.

Carry on bro'. :thumbsup:
Click to expand...
Oh yes yes yes. I hadn't noticed his response to Cuntz. Now that you mention it, I see it's nearly identical to the one directed towards me. Just no mention of guns in post #101.

AFA etiquette goes, I usually try to quote the person that the response is directed towards because sometimes we end up with 2 or 3 people replying to a thread. Doesn't seem to happen here but it happens a lot on some other forums.

Thanks for the clarification bro. (y)
 
No worries bro'.

Actually, good forum etiquette is not to quote unnecessarily, hence there being no need if a response follows a post directly.

The exception would be if one's referring to a component that's not immediately-obvious due to its being buried within a lengthy post. In this case it makes sense to quote only that sentence or whatever.

If I'm responding to the last thing said in a post, I never quote; it's 100% redundant. In natural speech we don't repeat things this way and besides that it creates unnecessary clutter for readers.
 
It goes without saying that these are highfalutin standards that I happen to follow.

I don't expect and will never instruct others to do this.
 
ccn said:
And none of what you say is exaggerated at all , the truth being revealed would completely destroy them. It's the ONLY reason the left is trying to destroy Musk . They have years and years invested in major lies and they relied on Twitter to keep those lies going which Twitter did . If any truth was posted that person would be banned immediately . The left now will continue to rely on Google, Facebook and the rest below:



The main stream media NEVER EVER TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT ANYTHING . They alter , delete , edit , omit and add wording to fit their narratives 100% of the time and have been doing so for decades .
Click to expand...
This is why I truly hate the digital world. Things can be quietly edited to fit a narrative (left or right). You can eliminate the trail as well… or not even need to worry since it will probably go unnoticed. Super easy to change history to fit whomever is in charge. Book are a lot harder to “change.” We all have seen corrupt governments do massive book burnings to change the past, today it’s a simple a a few key strokes. Scary shit!
 
e0b.jpeg


XMZLipv.jpeg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top