Search results

Sounds great! :rock:

:confused: :scared:

This sounds great, another one for Chicago. Is there a fee to attend?

Damn... :D

Great comparison, the Mesa wins though.

Lars must have been working with a personal trainer the last few months to play that double bass part... :scared:

Damn those sound tight, great tone as well! What amp were you playing though?

The Mesa Recto would be better, better construction/speakers which made it project and cut more than the MF 400. I thought they had similar levels of lows but the MF400 sounded boomier with my Triple than with the Recto cab. I had both cabs in the same room and they were both slanted. I'd say...

aMorAdnCixg

That sounds great! :rock:

Awesome job on this! :rock:

This is killer, well done! :rawk:

PM'ed you via FB, have been liking what I've heard so far!

Sounds really good man, pretty tight mix :rock: What amps were used?

This sounds great, well done! :rock: :rock:

Got my warlock fitted with 11's tuned to drop C and my beast fitted with 13's tuned to drop A. I used to use 13's for the warlock and baritone stings for the beast but it took away some of the edge and crunch

Nice! :rock:

Holy fuck this thread is full of win guys, almost spit my tea all over my monitor! :doh: :lol: :LOL: :D My pic is the modern red channel of a Rev C recto, just all sorts of viciousness with clarity to boot.

Ah ok, I'd say try to score a 2 ch or reborn head if possible, I'll explain. With the old 3 ch heads, a lot of them came installed with 100k gain pots when the schematic called for 250k, (My previous 3 ch duals had 100k gain pots and so did some others on the boogie board) I think they did this...

Do you have a reborn Triple or older 3 ch Triple?