
Ventura
Well-known member
My comments were more of a
situation... Ahem.
V.

V.

pstar":3strxmvx said:ventura, i hear ya ,i have reservations about a company that does not respond to its customers, and given that this niche industry/market, well it is unacceptable. Boutique means to cater.
If any of my employees treated any customer/associate in this fashion they be out of a job. Customer Service and respect is very important. I 've been doin research on these amps, and have seen the guts of a wizard and there's not much out of the ordinary, mine you the trannys are the ticket. theres a post at metro forum where they go into detail., interesting reads. i think tom has 1 kicking around use to tour with it, but i have not talked to him in years, have his number somewhere.
pstar":1r40gvwg said:SHARK, why did u sell them all? what was it about the slo ?
pstar":1pjelk7h said:well, it will just be for my own enjoyment in my home studio.
pstar":27kqzsco said:I 've been doin research on these amps, and have seen the guts of a wizard and there's not much out of the ordinary, mine you the trannys are the ticket.
Shark Diver":y1t3dbc9 said:pstar":y1t3dbc9 said:SHARK, why did u sell them all? what was it about the slo ?
For me the Wizard was an amp that had to be cranked, and was a little less versatile for me. The Diezels all had great things, but I would have taken a channel from the VH4, Herbert, and Einstein in a separate amp. That would have worked. lol
I liked the H&K, and I like different Bogners and Mesas. But ultimately, especially since you weren't looking for Nu-metal, I found the SLO more versatile. And I think if you look at the range of artist that have used it it's hard to argue that.
I have 3 and they all have different tube sets. I can get a fantastic range of tones. It just worked better for me than the others. And even with one tube set it had a wider range of useable tones for me. In a studio I'd simple switch tubes though.
pstar":2lo3dbuc said:from what i have researched, volume will be a issue to get the amp in its sweet spot than into saturation(7-8 on volume), and if i can not enjoy it without losing more of my hearing, this becomes a major issue for me. i've heard alot of good clips of the diezel, alot of previous wizard players have moved on. i think they are probably good amps in big open large stages. have a read over at metro forum about the parts. Wound be nice to hear the current line-up, but difficult to do because built 1 at a time and than shipped to the customer.
Heritage Softail":2f3nh058 said:Shark Diver":2f3nh058 said:pstar":2f3nh058 said:SHARK, why did u sell them all? what was it about the slo ?
For me the Wizard was an amp that had to be cranked, and was a little less versatile for me. The Diezels all had great things, but I would have taken a channel from the VH4, Herbert, and Einstein in a separate amp. That would have worked. lol
I liked the H&K, and I like different Bogners and Mesas. But ultimately, especially since you weren't looking for Nu-metal, I found the SLO more versatile. And I think if you look at the range of artist that have used it it's hard to argue that.
I have 3 and they all have different tube sets. I can get a fantastic range of tones. It just worked better for me than the others. And even with one tube set it had a wider range of useable tones for me. In a studio I'd simple switch tubes though.
I have had a few amps roll thru the man cave but the SLO has stayed. What tube sets are you using for what tones?
For the versatility mentioned in the OP, the SLO covers all that clean/blues/classic rock/hair band metal, and the clean side does take an OCD well and gets a different flavor of edge.
I have noticed the same thing with a huge variety of people using an SLO. The Clapton Knopfler live gig with SLO's sounded great. SRV was making the transition to an SLO. The whole 'one trick amp' comment is usually made by one trick guitar players. An LP and SLO is classic tone.