Soundstorm
Well-known member
Why do you like it, what style do you play, do you boost? I've owned the D-Moll twice and really liked it but I'm attracted to the prospect of a more open, tighter version of it with the Paul.
Fusionbear
Well-known member
I love the amp. It's a keeper for me.
Clean, fusion, rock, hard rock.
No boosting.
Clean, fusion, rock, hard rock.
No boosting.
Soundstorm
Well-known member
I actually just watched this on Youtube. Great playing! The white on white looks stellar.
Soundstorm
Well-known member
I'm also not detecting as much of a tonal change between Ch. 2 and 3 like there was on the D-Moll. Channel three on that one had tons of lower mids and compression and I couldn't use them as rhythm 1 and 2 like I wanted, there was too much of a tonal imbalance with the shared EQ.
Speeddemon
Well-known member
I never played the Paul, but I did play the D-Moll at a guy that was selling it, and it was just too congested in the low mids on both CH2 and 3.
Cleans were probably top 5 best ever, but I left without the amp. I was hoping for a smaller Herbert, but it missed the kerrangy side of the Herbert, and while it had a similar heft in the Tone, not being able to dial out that low-mid congestion, was a deal breaker for me.
Cleans were probably top 5 best ever, but I left without the amp. I was hoping for a smaller Herbert, but it missed the kerrangy side of the Herbert, and while it had a similar heft in the Tone, not being able to dial out that low-mid congestion, was a deal breaker for me.
