D-Moll and Paul comparisons?

[Soundstorm]

Has anyone owned or played both and can give me a run down? I've owned the D-Moll twice and am curious about the Paul.

 

[Pierre]

Own a VH2 and a Paul....the two are known to have the same first channel....but they're different ....the VH2 is more directionnal whereas the Paul certainly due to the 2 tubes and 45 watts seems to be more organic , alive , sensitive....Paul is on third channel able to do metal but is main personnality is based on classik rock.....under 12o'clock you can find a lot of crunchy tones ...really impressive .....after 12 it probably depends on your guitar pickups......the reverb is really great too.....a really good amp...

 

[Soundstorm]

Own a VH2 and a Paul....the two are known to have the same first channel....but they're different ....the VH2 is more directionnal whereas the Paul certainly due to the 2 tubes and 45 watts seems to be more organic , alive , sensitive....Paul is on third channel able to do metal but is main personnality is based on classik rock.....under 12o'clock you can find a lot of crunchy tones ...really impressive .....after 12 it probably depends on your guitar pickups......the reverb is really great too.....a really good amp...

Thanks Pierre! How would you compare the distortion between the VH2 and the Paul? In the metal range. I use EMGs fwiw.