
hunter
Active member
samhill":tpmq7xm3 said:mortega76":tpmq7xm3 said:We then disconnected the QSC and connected the SLA2 and it sounded even worse... I've always heard folks saying that it sounds great but it really sounded bad... I don't get what folks hear in the SLA2.
When I first got my AxeFx I tried a bunch of different amps. The SLA2, Mesa 2:100, Fryette 2/50/2, OD100se+ power section and my Egnater Seminar head power section.
At the time my order of preference was:
OD100
Mesa 2:100
Fryette 2/50/2
Egnater
SLA2
I was able to tweak the AxeFx by adding a PEQ and GEQ block to get the SLA2 to sound more like the Mesa 2:100, not by any means perfect, however very close.
My criteria for a poweramp was: stereo, weight, cost, size and tone.
Lets face it the SLA 2 is very inexpensive. If I had the extra bucks I would definitely go for the Mesa 2:100 or Fryette but they cost at least $1200 more where I am in Canada.
This is not saying that the AxeFx is way better than tube amps or vise versa, this is not saying that the AxeFx needs tube power to sound great. What I'm saying is that any amp that costs $299 probably is not in the same tone category as an $1800 poweramp.
Is the ART SLA2 the best amp for the AxeFx or any preamp....FUCK NO!!! Is it a light, inexpensive single rack space LOUD stereo amp that can work well with the AxeFX..yup.
Before anyone starts slagging me for the AxeFx.....I still own and love my tube amps and I love my AxeFx.
The only thing that's better than both is of course is, bacon...but that's a whole different discussion.
Mark
Dude that is just wrong! Parma ham is MUCH better than bacon!