metalmaniac93
Well-known member
reverymike":2ojkj3r1 said:Mark Day":2ojkj3r1 said:reverymike":2ojkj3r1 said:Kapo_Polenton":2ojkj3r1 said:Sounds thicker and meatier than the BE-100... I'd have to hear the mic'ed version. Sounds good but so far for me, I think i prefer the BE, just something about it from what I have heard in the PhilX clip.. also second the pink taco clip!
Really? I think it's thinner and brighter sounding than the BE. I'm having a hard time deciding which I want to get, the BE100 or the SS100.
Can any of you guys who have heard or played both chime in on the differences?
I have played both
The SS100 has more bottom and a full clean(Fendery). It also has a more vintage type tone, but still similar to the BE100.
The SS100 doesn't have the SAT, C45, FAT switches. My BE was gone for a week to a high profile client and I played my rig through the SS100 for that week....I could easily love both.
Both are ridiculously wicked.
Mark
Thanks Mark! You have made it no easier to choose!![]()
I think probably the BE100 is the one for me. Now. . .to sell my SLO
I played both in April when I was in LA and I like the BE-100 a little bit more. You cannot go wrong with either!!