Weirdwizardy":2i5i0x7d said:saw megadeth / slayer / testament live a few months ago
best tone was from Kerry King from Slayer
Jeff Hanneman tone sucked.
megadeth chris broderick had cool solo tone (thanks axe-fx) but his rhythm sucked.
Dave Mustaine tone was shit overall.
Sounded muddy and not enough gain, not punchy..
testament was fair.
Love the Friedman VS Gilbert stuff.......The Hoff":2anem4ek said:I'd have to agree with a few that have already mentioned it. Paul Gilbert. AMAZING player (obviously) not as amazing tone.
Yeah Steve Morse has some pretty strange distortion tones. I like the first two Dokken records, not so much when he went to the Rockman. I like the first two Ozzy records too...S.A.T.O is very cool.MisterBulbous":dpfacgvu said:The usual responses...but I'll go with steve morse and steve Howe. Victims of bad production would be alex skolnick on the early testament albums and George lynch before lock and key (although I think greasygeo will disagree).
OldSkoolNJ":23otqyuo said:
Heritage Softail":1ku87dvm said:
Heritage Softail":2rim2r58 said:Tone is totally subjective. Those guys that are selling tens of thousands of records/CD's are connecting with lots of people. Some may not like the tone but many many others do. Rhodes was a great guitarist and did the most with what he had back then.
I would imagine those slagging on Rhodes could not wipe the sweat off his nut sack when it comes to the great songs written and millions of fans world wide. That guitar sound ruled the rock/metal world back then. Anyone that picked up a guitar back then wanted to play that riff to Crazy Train. That tone/sound did not suck. It totally rocked. Trashing it comes across as somewhat arrogant posturing by botique gear cork sniffers. Opinions vary, but what have you done that is universally loved? Someone is not going to like it, no matter how perfect you try to make it. Is sure does not mean it is weak.
And Hendrix???? That terrible tone in Hey Joe turned the music world upside down the day it came out.
![]()
![]()
![]()
psychodave":3n20aae3 said:
Chubtone":2ulee4x4 said:Incorrect. Max Norman was a crappy recording engineer in 1981. If you think this was bad tone for 1981, you don't remember 1981. What do you think Ted Templeman could have done with this more accurate representation of Randy's real tone? It would have been SICK! Because live, it was huge.
OldSkoolNJ":17285hqp said:Motorpud":17285hqp said:Tawlks":17285hqp said:DimebagOldSkoolNJ":17285hqp said:Randy Rhoads![]()
![]()
![]()
Blizzard of OZ and Diary sound like they were recorded with a Line 6 spider combo or distortion pedal plugged directly into the board..![]()
![]()
![]()
I agree to a point...a lot of his tracks could have sounded better. That said, I can't imagine the opening riffs to Crazy Train or Flying High Again sounding any cooler than they do on those albums. When the heavy guitar kicks in on the track Diary of a Madman it sounds great to me...maybe its just that I'm so used to those tones since Randy was my inspiration to take playing seriously and I wore those albums out (I still play them on a regular basis).Chubtone":1cv5c3p7 said:OldSkoolNJ":1cv5c3p7 said:Like I said Blizzard of OZ and Diary Sound like shit..
Reminds me of the tubestack knob on the gorilla amps..![]()
![]()
And like I have argued from one end of the internet to the other, Randy did not have bad tone for that era as proven by the live clips. His tone was poorly represented on those records by the studios house engineer who was still learning his craft at that point but was all Ozzy could afford. I don't think we can blame that on Randy having bad tone.
And I think Diary sounded pretty cool.