
I don't know there is something about it and it's been the historical target and same goes for unemployment at 5%. Sort of like an 80/20 % thing......@The-Kid, I think the thing to ask is, why does the Fed want 2% increase in cost every year? It doesn't help anyone but the rich to have everyone lose purchasing power every year. The 2% target came from some other country and the US used it as an excuse so that inflation could keep happening. We didn't have this 2% target in the 1990s.
It's just the equilibrium target for a healthy economy @BABMusic simply put. 2% is the Goldilocks zone so to speak and economically speaking
Deflation is nice if you have bags of money laying around but when it comes to making new money, circulating it and overall new and real growth it's not as good as you may think although in many cases it is better than inflation for example one can say.I think that's how they sold it, but there's really no scientific argument for why we're better off with 2% less purchasing power every year. Deflation is the best for consumers because it allows you to buy more. 2009-12 was rough for some people, but great for those who saved.
I'm not smart to be honest. My Econ, Business and Calc Professors and teachers in College and in HS or JH they were smart.......By skimming through this thread, you can easily see that The~Kid is much smarter than Bonerlover.![]()
They have not.The Fed also announced 5 rate cuts coming up for interest rates at .25 points each......
The GDP growth is just inflation?2% inflation I figure there is a connection between that and 2% GDP growth
Your right that was speculation I read somewhere but given inflation going down maybe not 5 .25 point drops but maybe 2 or 3 depending on inflation.They have not.
Not really but the thing is you need growth to keep up with inflation. They don't necessarily go hand in hand really but yeah you need GDP to grow to keep up with inflation.The GDP growth is just inflation?![]()