
Bad Brain
Well-known member
Internet tough guy...Trump is the one who pussied out. It was a tough guy act and he didn't follow through. Just like I know you wouldn't if we were face to face.Pussy yippers, just like you.
Internet tough guy...Trump is the one who pussied out. It was a tough guy act and he didn't follow through. Just like I know you wouldn't if we were face to face.Pussy yippers, just like you.
Sounds like you need to take up arms with dumbpicker up in Canadastan and bring the bloody battle to usInternet tough guy...Trump is the one who pussied out. It was a tough guy act and he didn't follow through. Just like I know you wouldn't if we were face to face.
I have faced many queens like you.Just like I know you wouldn't if we were face to face.
I only pointed out that Trump backed down, which wouldn't have been particularly notable if not for the whole tough guy routine. I didn't negate @MadAsAHatter commentary, which was fair enough, other than I think he is overlooking that Trump is arguably acting recklessly.Sounds like you need to take up arms with dumbpicker up in Canadastan and bring the bloody battle to us![]()
Dancing on the playground like cheerleaders giddy at the prospect or "orange man" failing shows just how brainwashed and short sighted some of the posts here are. I'm not implying you're at that level, but supporting some of the things most of these taint lickers post puts you in that company.I just pointed out that Trump backed down, which wouldn't have been notable if not for the whole tough guy routine. I didn't even negate your commentary, which was fair enough, other than he's arguably acting recklessly.
I try to be objective. There is an opposite to TDS, where for some supporters Trump can do no wrong and is beyond criticism.but supporting some of the things most of these taint lickers post puts you in that company.
Regurgitating Yahoo finance opinion propaganda is not exactly objective.I aim to be objective. There is an opposite to TDS, where for some supporters Trump can do no wrong and is beyond criticism.
Well, at least it looks like the real crash, is not here just yet.
That wasn't an opinion piece, it was fair reporting. His words:Regurgitating Yahoo finance opinion propaganda is not exactly objective.
If you feel that strongly you can always leverage your position.wish I had more cash to keep buying in.
true, but unnecessary. I've been buying in all year, so far.If you feel that strongly you can always leverage your position.
That wasn't an opinion piece, it was fair reporting. His words:
Well his initial move lead to market chaos. I think it's a fair enough characterization anyways, but what adjective would you choose? Would you prefer 'ad hoc'?"It was another chaotic move in Trump's ever-shifting tariff plans"
OPINION
I wouldn't, DT is a results oriented person.but what adjective would you choose? Would you prefer 'ad hoc'?
You get that with any candidiate. But screaming at the sky 4 months into his term when he is constantly facing uphill battle from the swamp is MTV drama worthy.I try to be objective. There is an opposite to TDS, where for some supporters Trump can do no wrong and is beyond criticism.
That wasn't an opinion piece, it was fair reporting. His words:
He was asked a fair question and gave his answer. The outlet is irrelevant .CNBC? Really? There is no fair reporting anymore.
It’s not chaotic, it’s bush league. Private and foreign money are leaving the markets as we continue to antagonize and isolate allies and it’s getting baked into the cake. It wasn’t the stock market or “Trump Put” that caused yesterday's "pivot", it was the bond market. Bessent offered up a benign anecdotal explanation, but it could be a far uglier scenario and that’s what spooked him. If he wants to take a victory lap, then let him. Without policy clarity, certainty and stability, companies and investments will sit tight, which means no growth.Well his initial move lead to market chaos. I think it's a fair enough characterization anyways, but what adjective would you choose? Would you prefer 'ad hoc'?