If “86” Is Illegal Speech, Nobody is Free

[The~Kid]

The fact is, the right has been spewing violent rhetoric since at least the days of Obama, and like typical crybully bitches, they love to dish it but can't take it when they get back 1% of the same energy.

The facts are that POS scum like you apologize for assassination attempts on a President......


Which no one ever did under Obama or Biden......


Yet its happened more than a handful of times under the direction of lunatics at CNN/MSNBC/NYTimes and other WokTards like you and the like.

 

[Picasso]

JD Nosack is very mad at Trump today.

 

[The~Kid]

JD Nosack is very mad at Trump today.

Fucker is probably commie Gleesak for sure

 

[DanTravis62]

Anyone who thinks the indictment is based on just the "8647" seashells has a big surprise coming when the prosecutors make their evidence public, i'm guessing

I'm also guessing that the contents of Comey's truly dogshit ass novel (which is was promoting at the time of the posts) which is literally about political dogwhistling to commit assassinations has something to do with the charges - unfortunately, i've read parts of the book, and I 100% know this to be the case.

But yeah, go ahead and litigate the seashells in a vacuum, smart move

 

[Robostyle]

And 86 means to kick someone out, dumb fucker.

It has other meanings though depending on context.
You're just making excuses and playing semantics.
There are a million places that allow what you want to do.
This is just not one of them.

 

[MadAsAHatter]

Anyone who thinks the indictment is based on just the "8647" seashells has a big surprise coming when the prosecutors make their evidence public, i'm guessing

I'm also guessing that the contents of Comey's truly dogshit ass novel (which is was promoting at the time of the posts) which is literally about political dogwhistling to commit assassinations has something to do with the charges - unfortunately, i've read parts of the book, and I 100% know this to be the case.

But yeah, go ahead and litigate the seashells in a vacuum, smart move

I read an article yesterday that was saying this same thing; several charges and evidence are unrelated to the seashells thing.

 

[DanTravis62]

I read an article yesterday that was saying this same thing; several charges and evidence are unrelated to the seashells thing.

Yep. If I had to predict it

I would say that he was using this as a backhanded way of promoting his book (which is about dogwhistling political assassinations; there's like a fictional "Alex jones" in the book that makes racists assassinate people or some gay shit like that)

And that this is just a piece of the puzzle to something bigger

That's just a guess though, because comey is a slippery fuck and theres no way they would just indict him over the IG post in a vacuum

 

[JamesTiberiusKirk]

Anyone who thinks the indictment is based on just the "8647" seashells has a big surprise coming when the prosecutors make their evidence public, i'm guessing

I'm also guessing that the contents of Comey's truly dogshit ass novel (which is was promoting at the time of the posts) which is literally about political dogwhistling to commit assassinations has something to do with the charges - unfortunately, i've read parts of the book, and I 100% know this to be the case.

But yeah, go ahead and litigate the seashells in a vacuum, smart move

Are you guessing or do you know something?

 

[DanTravis62]

Are you guessing or do you know something?

I was pretty clear that I was guessing

But i'm guessing based on those two facts that no one had brought up in the thread yet

1. The post in question was sandwiched inbetween two posts about the book, which is literally about political assassinations - and dogwhistles for political assassinations, at that (hmm seems sus?)
2. It seems unlikely that they would indict him again without some sort of evidence that hasn't been made public yet, because the post by itself, while certainly classless, inflammatory, and inciting, isn't technically illegal on it's own. Seems very likely that when they make the evidence public there will be some surprises

 

[JDs Couch]

Anyone who thinks the indictment is based on just the "8647" seashells has a big surprise coming when the prosecutors make their evidence public, i'm guessing

I'm also guessing that the contents of Comey's truly dogshit ass novel (which is was promoting at the time of the posts) which is literally about political dogwhistling to commit assassinations has something to do with the charges - unfortunately, i've read parts of the book, and I 100% know this to be the case.

But yeah, go ahead and litigate the seashells in a vacuum, smart move

This is literally the indictment.
https://justice.gov/opa/media/1438481/dl

It's very short and is entirely about the seashells. Go ahead and read it.

 

[JamesTiberiusKirk]

Ok. Then here's what I think.

Trump is well know for his vindictiveness and thirst for revenge. I'm sure we can agree on that. Trump has one real skill, he knows how to use the legal system to get what he wants and now that he's president he has near unlimited sway over the legal system (the attorney general) So, based on those facts here's the Occam's razor story.

Trump is looking for any reason, no matter what, to drag Comey into court*. Even if for nothing else, to bleed him financially in a legal fight that will take months, perhaps years if appeals are considered.

One reason why Trump fired Bondi is that she wouldn't charge Comey with this obviously flimsy case.

By way of explanation - I have zero love for Comey. His timing of the investigation into Hilldog's email bullshit was specifically timed to influence the election against her. IIRC he even said he knew his timing of the announcement would in fact have political overtones. He said so in his book (source below)

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/apr/13/james-comey-book-hillary-clinton-email-investigation


*EDIT To get revenge for the Russiagate investigation.

 

[Picasso]

Two beta male faggots back to back posting.

 

[JamesTiberiusKirk]

Two beta male faggots back to back posting.

Are you erect now?

 

[DanTravis62]

This is literally the indictment.
https://justice.gov/opa/media/1438481/dl

It's very short and is entirely about the seashells. Go ahead and read it.

The indictment means absolutely nothing dude, that's retarded.

As Rush Limbaugh said, you can "indict a ham sandwich."

Discovery is where the meat will either be there, or it won't, and we'll see

You may be right and they have absolutely nothing - that's certainly a possibility. But that seems like a stupid move on their part, especially the 2nd time around. Which is why I was willing to guess that there's more to it, especially RE his book.

 

[JDs Couch]

The indictment means absolutely nothing dude, that's retarded.

As Rush Limbaugh said, you can "indict a ham sandwich."

Discovery is where the meat will either be there, or it won't, and we'll see

You may be right and they have absolutely nothing - that's certainly a possibility. But that seems like a stupid move on their part, especially the 2nd time around. Which is why I was willing to guess that there's more to it, especially RE his book.

Yes, it's very stupid. That's what this regime is.

 

[JDs Couch]

Ok. Then here's what I think.

Trump is well know for his vindictiveness and thirst for revenge. I'm sure we can agree on that. Trump has one real skill, he knows how to use the legal system to get what he wants and now that he's president he has near unlimited sway over the legal system (the attorney general) So, based on those facts here's the Occam's razor story.

Trump is looking for any reason, no matter what, to drag Comey into court*. Even if for nothing else, to bleed him financially in a legal fight that will take months, perhaps years if appeals are considered.

One reason why Trump fired Bondi is that she wouldn't charge Comey with this obviously flimsy case.

By way of explanation - I have zero love for Comey. His timing of the investigation into Hilldog's email bullshit was specifically timed to influence the election against her. IIRC he even said he knew his timing of the announcement would in fact have political overtones. He said so in his book (source below)

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/apr/13/james-comey-book-hillary-clinton-email-investigation


*EDIT To get revenge for the Russiagate investigation.

Imagine a case so obviously bullshit that even Pam Bondi wouldn't try it...

 

[Floyd Eye]

They are indicting him for the wrong shit. The seashell thing is never going to withstand judicial scrutiny as a credible threat. They should focus on the treason, perjury and interfering in an election.

 

[JDs Couch]

They are indicting him for the wrong shit. The seashell thing is never going to withstand judicial scrutiny as a credible threat. They should focus on the treason, perjury and interfering in an election.

If they had a case, they would.

 

[Floyd Eye]

If they had a case, they would.

Well. I think there's a case, but like all of the shit politicians do, somehow nothing ever happens with it.

 

[Robostyle]

Yes, it's very stupid. That's what this regime is.

How is "your regime" in comparison?