Sounds good. When the guy was playing the GnR lead I could hear the HRG a little better. The amp seems a little brighter and grinding than the OG. Better upper mids, like you said. Both sound excellent though.
Sounds good. When the guy was playing the GnR lead I could hear the HRG a little better. The amp seems a little brighter and grinding than the OG. Better upper mids, like you said. Both sound excellent though.
This is all true. I can bring the presence on the OG up about +3 to get it in the brightness ballpark, but the RI has better grind than the (ultra smooth) OGs
This is all true. I can bring the presence on the OG up about +3 to get it in the brightness ballpark, but the RI has better grind than the (ultra smooth) OGs
Do you have a comparison vid between the RI c+ and the RI Recto? Obviously I know they are different amps with different core sounds, but there's no way I would ever try both in this universe
You know well i'm not really a "mesa guy" but these new RIs seem my best opportunity to get a good representation of the classic mesa sound for a reasonable money, and I'm kind of debating which would work for me best
I'm leaning towards the C+ reissue as i've always hated the low end on rectos, but if the reissue recto is as tight as the early revisions that might change the math for me