Joe Holmes - WILL IT CHUGG? New album streaming..

  • Thread starter Thread starter napalmdeath
  • Start date Start date
I got the CD in of Friday. Great album. I actually like the singer. It definitely has some AIC vibe to it, but I'm cool with that. IMHO, Joe has a very unique voice when soloing. As stated earlier, it is a breath of fresh air is the current sea of suck in music.
 
Definitely anxious to dig on this. Joe’s why I fell in love with CBS headstocks and Floyds on Strats and probably has a lot to do with my love of Marshalls now.
 
A grown man caring about what another grown man looks like. Happy Pride Month.

Sorry man, taking a shower matters. I am not talking about juggling his balls but dude still thinks he is a 15 year old hippy. Time to get out of the work boots and low hanging shorts. Saw him back in the early 2000's with Ozzy and he looked like a skinny rat with no shirt on and shorts hanging so low. Some looks just don't advantage men at this age.
 
Really digging the album, Joe has a great guitar sound on it and the production isn't over-plug in'd and blown out like a lot of modern rock albums seem to be now.

Sounds very Sabbath-y to me, but overall it's awesome!
 
Sorry man, taking a shower matters. I am not talking about juggling his balls but dude still thinks he is a 15 year old hippy. Time to get out of the work boots and low hanging shorts. Saw him back in the early 2000's with Ozzy and he looked like a skinny rat with no shirt on and shorts hanging so low. Some looks just don't advantage men at this age.
Yeah I know what you mean, it's not a great look but it's his thing and he likes it so it doesn't bother me too much.
 
Bought the cd hr ago. Looking forward to it! This sounds good.

Dude has been using the same Jose amps since the beginning. His tone has to be one of the best hard rock tones ever.

His playing is fantastic. Lil Zakk, lil Randy, whole lotta Joe. Love it.
Joe had the second best live tone I've ever heard back when I saw him with Ozzy. Relatively simple live setup as well. Only better live tone I've heard was Ed on the VHIII tour.
 
Yeah I know what you mean, it's not a great look but it's his thing and he likes it so it doesn't bother me too much.
I think playing with those scabs Trujillo and Bordin is an even worse look.
 
I got the CD in of Friday. Great album. I actually like the singer. It definitely has some AIC vibe to it, but I'm cool with that. IMHO, Joe has a very unique voice when soloing. As stated earlier, it is a breath of fresh air is the current sea of suck in music.
Mine is in the way. Can't wait to spin it a few times.
On par with Farmikos?
 
Sorry man, taking a shower matters. I am not talking about juggling his balls but dude still thinks he is a 15 year old hippy. Time to get out of the work boots and low hanging shorts. Saw him back in the early 2000's with Ozzy and he looked like a skinny rat with no shirt on and shorts hanging so low. Some looks just don't advantage men at this age.
It's crazy to me when grown men care what other grown men they don't even know dress or look like. Maybe you should send him a message explaining your side....Maybe he will listen.
 
Mine is in the way. Can't wait to spin it a few times.
On par with Farmikos?
If you liked the Farmikos album, this one will scratch that same itch. I have been listening to it since I got it. Very cool album.
 
I didn't like this album nearly as much as the first one. Not bad by any means, but nothing grabbed me.
 
Why are they scabs?
Fuck those guys and the Osbournes

https://faroutmagazine.co.uk/ozzy-osbourne-re-recorded-two-biggest-albums/

In 1986, Daisley and Kerslake sued Osbourne for unpaid royalties, eventually winning songwriting credits on Blizzard of Ozz and Diary of a Madman. Subsequently, a 2002 reissue was made of these albums which replaced Daisley and Kerslake's original bass and drum parts with new parts recorded by Osbourne's then-current drummer Mike Bordin and bassist Robert Trujillo. The 2002 reissue also included new backing vocals from singers Mark Lennon and John Shanks.

Osbourne's wife and manager, Sharon, claimed at the time that it was Ozzy, not she, who was responsible for the decision to re-record the parts, stating "because of Daisley and Kerslake's abusive and unjust behaviour, Ozzy wanted to remove them from these recordings. We turned a negative into a positive by adding a fresh sound to the original albums."<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blizzard_of_Ozz#cite_note-38"><span>[</span>38<span>]</span></a> However, Osbourne contradicted this claim in his 2009 autobiography I Am Ozzy, stating that the decision to re-record the original bass and drum parts was Sharon's decision, and that he "didn't have anything to do with" it.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blizzard_of_Ozz#cite_note-osbourneautobiography-39"><span>[</span>39<span>]</span></a> He said his wife "just snapped" and had it done without his knowledge.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blizzard_of_Ozz#cite_note-osbourneautobiography-39"><span>[</span>39<span>]</span></a> He also stated that "a sticker was put on the covers telling everyone about it",<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blizzard_of_Ozz#cite_note-osbourneautobiography-39"><span>[</span>39<span>]</span></a> although the sticker was not initially placed on the re-issue and was only placed on the covers at a later date due to fan outcry over the altered recordings.

In 2003, Daisley and Kerslake's lawsuit was dismissed by the United States District Court in Los Angeles. This dismissal was upheld by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blizzard_of_Ozz#cite_note-40"><span>[</span>40<span>]</span></a> With regard to the reissue, Ozzy stated to The Pulse of Radio, reiterating a conversation with Sharon,<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blizzard_of_Ozz#cite_note-41"><span>[</span>41<span>]</span></a> "You know what, whatever the circumstances were, I want the original thing back." The 30th Anniversary release of Blizzard of Ozz and Diary of a Madman contains the original recordings, not the 2002 remixes.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blizzard_of_Ozz#cite_note-42"><span>[</span>42<span>]</span></a>
 
Fuck those guys and the Osbournes

https://faroutmagazine.co.uk/ozzy-osbourne-re-recorded-two-biggest-albums/

In 1986, Daisley and Kerslake sued Osbourne for unpaid royalties, eventually winning songwriting credits on Blizzard of Ozz and Diary of a Madman. Subsequently, a 2002 reissue was made of these albums which replaced Daisley and Kerslake's original bass and drum parts with new parts recorded by Osbourne's then-current drummer Mike Bordin and bassist Robert Trujillo. The 2002 reissue also included new backing vocals from singers Mark Lennon and John Shanks.

Osbourne's wife and manager, Sharon, claimed at the time that it was Ozzy, not she, who was responsible for the decision to re-record the parts, stating "because of Daisley and Kerslake's abusive and unjust behaviour, Ozzy wanted to remove them from these recordings. We turned a negative into a positive by adding a fresh sound to the original albums."<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blizzard_of_Ozz#cite_note-38"><span>[</span>38<span>]</span></a> However, Osbourne contradicted this claim in his 2009 autobiography I Am Ozzy, stating that the decision to re-record the original bass and drum parts was Sharon's decision, and that he "didn't have anything to do with" it.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blizzard_of_Ozz#cite_note-osbourneautobiography-39"><span>[</span>39<span>]</span></a> He said his wife "just snapped" and had it done without his knowledge.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blizzard_of_Ozz#cite_note-osbourneautobiography-39"><span>[</span>39<span>]</span></a> He also stated that "a sticker was put on the covers telling everyone about it",<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blizzard_of_Ozz#cite_note-osbourneautobiography-39"><span>[</span>39<span>]</span></a> although the sticker was not initially placed on the re-issue and was only placed on the covers at a later date due to fan outcry over the altered recordings.

In 2003, Daisley and Kerslake's lawsuit was dismissed by the United States District Court in Los Angeles. This dismissal was upheld by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blizzard_of_Ozz#cite_note-40"><span>[</span>40<span>]</span></a> With regard to the reissue, Ozzy stated to The Pulse of Radio, reiterating a conversation with Sharon,<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blizzard_of_Ozz#cite_note-41"><span>[</span>41<span>]</span></a> "You know what, whatever the circumstances were, I want the original thing back." The 30th Anniversary release of Blizzard of Ozz and Diary of a Madman contains the original recordings, not the 2002 remixes.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blizzard_of_Ozz#cite_note-42"><span>[</span>42<span>]</span></a>
This is a business. And it is often run mafia style. There are countless stories of how artists and managers for 70s and 80s bands were extremely cutthroat with their business tactics. The Osbournes and Jake E Lee. Dio and Vivian Campbell. Van Halen v Roth and then Van Halen v Hagar and then Van Halen v Mike Anthony.

I think calling two session/ touring hired guns scabs for taking work is silly. Someone was going to get paid to retrack those albums.
 
I’d imagine if Sharon can force Zakk to shave his beard when he re-joined Ozzy, she likely had no problem telling Bordin and Trujillo what to do.

I also don’t know what I’d do in that particular situation if I were asked to re-record those parts; regardless if the request came from Sharon or Ozzy, I’d have to think as much of you might like Blizzard, there’s an aspect of saying “No, Sharon and Ozzy Osbourne, I won’t do what you’re asking me even though the original album never would have happened without either of you and none of us would be here” that would play a role in that decision.

And at the very least, “Shit, either I can record these songs and have my name on one of the best albums of all time, even if I’m not stoked with what it actually is, or some other dude will get the job and I get nothing, while potentially losing the next couple years worth of work”, I’d likely take the option as well.
 
I didn't like this album nearly as much as the first one. Not bad by any means, but nothing grabbed me.
This is a business. And it is often run mafia style. There are countless stories of how artists and managers for 70s and 80s bands were extremely cutthroat with their business tactics. The Osbournes and Jake E Lee. Dio and Vivian Campbell. Van Halen v Roth and then Van Halen v Hagar and then Van Halen v Mike Anthony.

I think calling two session/ touring hired guns scabs for taking work is silly. Someone was going to get paid to retrack those albums.
Dismissing it as “business” does not excuse nor justify these despicable actions.

And you’re correct, if they didn’t take the work, some other scabs would have.
There is no other way to describe hired guns who would participate in the re-recording of Daisley’s and Kerslake’s tracks with the sole purpose of fucking them out of their due royalties.
Especially when concerning those two masterpieces and the sole albums that Rhoads played on.
SCABS…
 
I’d imagine if Sharon can force Zakk to shave his beard when he re-joined Ozzy, she likely had no problem telling Bordin and Trujillo what to do.

I also don’t know what I’d do in that particular situation if I were asked to re-record those parts; regardless if the request came from Sharon or Ozzy, I’d have to think as much of you might like Blizzard, there’s an aspect of saying “No, Sharon and Ozzy Osbourne, I won’t do what you’re asking me even though the original album never would have happened without either of you and none of us would be here” that would play a role in that decision.
The original album wouldn’t be there if not for Daisley’s and Kerslake’s writing and playing contributions either.
 
Back
Top