angelspade":1ugvqkez said:
Business":1ugvqkez said:
voodooradio1":1ugvqkez said:
Kirk is well known in the industry, and most that are in to heavy music know who he is [...] None of that changes the facts that he is the weakest link in his band.
Haven't heard so much praise for Lars in a very long time...
yup...Kirk's vibrato sucks...Kirk only leans on his wah....Lars can't keep time and uses the same fills on every song...James' voice doesn't hold up anymore....Bla, bla bla. I get it...I really do: they just can't meet the standards of the average Dream Theater obsessed Berkley graduate. But the are greater than the sum of their parts and THE BIGGEST METAL BAND that has walked God's green earth. Based on this fact, I am going to continue to operate under the assumption that they are doing some things right...Regardless of what we all think of their "technique".
Millions started listening to Metallica because of their heavy sound, great songs, angry rebellious nature. When they came out it seemed like bands like Iron Maiden and Preist were old fashioned over night. That heavy chunk rhythm sound on the low E was perfected by them, or should I say Hetfield. Once Metallica was well known you could hear soo many other bands copying that heavy sound.
But who wrote the songs from Kill Em All up to the Black album? Who played all the rhythm parts? The guitar solo's aren't why Metallica became so popular and the fact is that you could throw tons of other players into the lead role in Metallica and they'd still be the top metal band. The status of the level of playing of whoever plays lead in Metallica will be raised because the popularity and success of the band.