NAD - Randall Thrasher 50 (Review)

  • Thread starter Thread starter napalmdeath
  • Start date Start date
napalmdeath":mtrx7tl9 said:
mchn13":mtrx7tl9 said:
have you had it at band volume? I know you've had the evh50 like I use now, and the rd45, and ive used both of those at more than enough band volumes. the thrasher is pretty much the only one I haven't had my hands on, and sounds better in clips than the satan or the diavlo, which Ive had plenty of time on.
if I were to get one, I would rather get a 50 than a 100-120watt.



I don't do the band thing anymore, but I've had it up pretty loud. I can say, without a doubt, that it loves volume, and comes alive when you crank it. The RD and EVH just get louder, the Thrasher gets meaner.

yeah, I need to hear one in person, it sounds like a bad ass in clips.
 
mchn13":mi5d92nn said:
napalmdeath":mi5d92nn said:
mchn13":mi5d92nn said:
have you had it at band volume? I know you've had the evh50 like I use now, and the rd45, and ive used both of those at more than enough band volumes. the thrasher is pretty much the only one I haven't had my hands on, and sounds better in clips than the satan or the diavlo, which Ive had plenty of time on.
if I were to get one, I would rather get a 50 than a 100-120watt.



I don't do the band thing anymore, but I've had it up pretty loud. I can say, without a doubt, that it loves volume, and comes alive when you crank it. The RD and EVH just get louder, the Thrasher gets meaner.

yeah, I need to hear one in person, it sounds like a bad ass in clips.

It is, I love it!
 
Back
Top