Robert Card (Maine Mass Shooter) Case Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter CrazyNutz
  • Start date Start date
Interesting that Brazil has the highest gun death rate, but up until recently had very stringent gun control laws (self defense was considered not a valid reason to own a firearm).
Then Bolsonaro greatly relaxed gun control laws and "After the relaxation on gun laws in 2019 by President Jair Bolsonaro, the number of deaths registered by homicide was 19% lower compared to 2018 (51,558), while in 2019 the registered number was 41,635 being the lowest number of homicide deaths since 2007.[15]"
Venezuela is the highest on the link above, 36%
 
Yeah, really not that bad when you put it in perspective.

Honestly I think americans need to stop attacking gun rights, and gay rights. This is fucking stupid.
Americans need to stop attacking the Constitution, and infringing on our own rights. Starting with our ruling parasites in government at all levels.
 
even Greenland has a higher per capita gun death rate than the US; due to suicide.
 
Well, the US isn’t even in the top 10 per capita gun related homicides. And the second highest, Venezuela, stopped issuing new gun permits in 2013. ?
Venezuela with totalitarians in charge, you can't have rights. hell, our own ruling parasites constantly deny and infringe on our rights, especially 2A.
 
Yeah, I think America and it's culture are uniquely violent. I maintain there is nothing inherent in a gun, knife or any weapon that increases the likelihood it would be used. It boils down the the individual and they reflect their environment to a large degree, apart from the natural tendencies of humans. Consider a pit-bull. Sure, some genetics are involved, but you have to abuse the crap out of them to get them to be as nasty as some of them are.
So why don’t gun laws reflect our uniquely violent culture?
You can compare apples to oranges all you want, all it does is sidestep the issues
 
So why don’t gun laws reflect our uniquely violent culture?
You mean like a law against murder? :rolleyes: ...Or do you mean laws that make it more difficult, if not impossible, for peaceful, law-abiding citizens to purchase a gun?
 
You mean like a law against murder? :rolleyes: ...Or do you mean laws that make it more difficult, if not impossible, for peaceful, law-abiding citizens to purchase a gun?

It should certainly be difficult for people to get guns. Not impossible, not unjustly difficult, but certainly not easy. People have to go through training and certifications for all kinds of potentially dangerous things, why not guns? Getting permit seems like more of an inconvenience than a difficulty.

Because of our constitution I don’t think there should be straight up ban, but it’s obviously too simple to get your hands on one.
 
It should certainly be difficult for people to get guns. Not impossible, not unjustly difficult, but certainly not easy. People have to go through training and certifications for all kinds of potentially dangerous things, why not guns? Getting permit seems like more of an inconvenience than a difficulty.

Because of our constitution I don’t think there should be straight up ban, but it’s obviously too simple to get your hands on one.
As I already mentioned, guns have been increasingly difficult to obtain over the years, but that hasn't seemed to help, has it? What makes you think that restricting or impeding rights is the solution? You're essentially arguing for more violence, in that you believe the state should act, which involves it's implicit threat of violence. Remember what I was saying a few posts back?
 
Because of our constitution I don’t think there should be straight up ban, but it’s obviously too simple to get your hands on one.

The problem will never be solved because it's a political game.

Left politics says we need to ban, or add more restrictions, right politics says the radical left is after your guns so the gov can take over. These two sides use it as the bogeyman, they always need a bogeyman to rally support. ?‍♂️
 
As I already mentioned, guns have been increasingly difficult to obtain over the years, but that hasn't seemed to help, has it? What makes you think that restricting or impeding rights is the solution? You're essentially arguing for more violence, in that you believe the state should act, which involves it's implicit threat of violence. Remember what I was saying a few posts back?
Increasingly difficult compared to what? Simply having enough money to buy one?

I looked up how to get a permit in my state of Massachusetts and it seems like it’s pretty easy for anyone that isn’t a convicted felon.

I am not arguing more violence, I believe you are. If you believe humans are inherently violent creatures, why are we giving them instruments to expedite the violence?

That is why guns, and any weapons are made; to kill someone more efficiently. Guns have one purpose and one purpose only.
Sure humans can make most anything in to a weapon, but that is much different than something that is designed to be nothing but a weapon.
 
The problem will never be solved because it's a political game.

Left politics says we need to ban, or add more restrictions, right politics says the radical left is after your guns so the gov can take over. These two sides use it as the bogeyman, they always need a bogeyman to rally support. ?‍♂️
Very true. Gun rights are held up on a pedestal by too many, and also villainized by just as many. A drag queen talks to a class room and people cry “what about the children!”. Meanwhile guns kill more children then cancer and it’s “well, there isn’t much we can do about that”.

Guns shouldn’t be banned, but fuck if we can’t do a better job of controlling them. Everyone gets hard over their personal rights but too many completely ignore their personal responsibility with those rights
 
Very true. Gun rights are held up on a pedestal by too many, and also villainized by just as many. A drag queen talks to a class room and people cry “what about the children!”. Meanwhile guns kill more children then cancer and it’s “well, there isn’t much we can do about that”.

Guns shouldn’t be banned, but fuck if we can’t do a better job of controlling them. Everyone gets hard over their personal rights but too many completely ignore their personal responsibility with those rights

I'd argue to say there would be less guns, and less drag queens reading books to kids, if everyone would back TF off.

One side pushes, the other side responds even crazier. American citizens are the losers here, politicians, and the media are the winners.
 
It should certainly be difficult for people to get guns. Not impossible, not unjustly difficult, but certainly not easy. People have to go through training and certifications for all kinds of potentially dangerous things, why not guns? Getting permit seems like more of an inconvenience than a difficulty.

Because of our constitution I don’t think there should be straight up ban, but it’s obviously too simple to get your hands on one.
not simple, depends on the local tyrants in your state and county. I went through the process (background checks, etc.) to get a state weapons carry permit issued by my county probate court for a fee to exercise my 2A right with limitations due to current infringements.

Each time I purchase a weapon, I have to show my permit and fill out government paperwork (which will eventually end up in one or more government databases) with the gun dealer.

In some states, as many anti-gun / first time buyers discovered during the pandemic they couldn't just walk into a store, buy a gun, and walk out of the store with their new gun; they had wait up to 10 days to actually possess their gun.
 
It's not about TOTAL gun deaths. It's not about EVERY type of gun. It's about MASS SHOOTINGS and the large majority of them happening with AR type guns. Just like the meme Dan posted that points out how mass shootings have decreased since AR have been banned in other countries.
 
Increasingly difficult compared to what? Simply having enough money to buy one?
Like I said, in the 50's you could mail order a high-powered rifle.
If you believe humans are inherently violent creatures, why are we giving them instruments to expedite the violence?
Exactly. The people you want to task with restricting gun access are equally as violent, if not more so. What you seem to want is for some people to have easy access to guns, but not others.
 
not simple, depends on the local tyrants in your state and county. I went through the process (background checks, etc.) to get a state weapons carry permit issued by my county probate court for a fee to exercise my 2A right with limitations due to current infringements.

Each time I purchase a weapon, I have to show my permit and fill out government paperwork (which will eventually end up in one or more government databases) with the gun dealer.

In some states, as many anti-gun / first time buyers discovered during the pandemic they couldn't just walk into a store, buy a gun, and walk out of the store with their new gun; they had wait up to 10 days to actually possess their gun.
All of that sounds incredibly easy to do man. I’ve been waiting 3 months for my new truck to arrive that I a drive with license that it took like a year to get after hours of classes.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top