
LP Freak
Well-known member
You guys fall for this troll every time 

He puts alot of work into his craft I wouldn't want to disappoint him.You guys fall for this troll every time![]()
You can't get this amount of bass with a super lead :
the tone in the video has nothing to do with the studio sound plus it seems that the studio setup was way different than the live one. His tone live seems to be a downgrade compared to the studio one in my opinion.
listen to the isolated guitar tracks above and listen to bloom in rwtd : no super lead, no jcm amp got that bloom even with tubes removed it is caracteristic of vintage jtm amps. It has been confirmed multiple times that 2 guitar amps were used at the same time in van halen 1 so you can't get the full tone only with half of the amps.
where am i trolling ?You guys fall for this troll every time![]()
Every post you makewhere am i trolling ?
View attachment 409374
he was the real deal eddie first amp tech i think he knows more about ed's amps than mike soldano john suhr and dave friedman.
The same for kevin dugan
View attachment 409375
where am i trolling ?
View attachment 409374
he was the real deal eddie first amp tech i think he knows more about ed's amps than mike soldano john suhr and dave friedman.
The same for kevin dugan
View attachment 409375
this is a modded 68 with a cascade a la josé made by audette :
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSS.......THIS!^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^He was playing a Mesa Mark II.
You marshall guys have been chasing that tone on the wrong platform for decades.
The Mesa Boogie mark II came out(released) in 1978 Van Halen 1 was recorded in 1977 and released in 1978 so Eddie couldn’t have used a mesa Boogie mark II