
spirit7
Active member
snowdog":1anah5ir said:spirit7":1anah5ir said:The constant comparisons to Gibson irritate me. People need to get it into their heads that PRS is not trying to emulate Gibson.
Seems to me that they are, clearly not every model but undoubtedly in the single cut department. I'm guessing that Paul spent a lot of time grilling Ted McCarty (President of Gibson 1950-1966, designer of the LP, V, Explorer, Tune-O-Matic bridge etc...) on the finer points of Classic guitar design, while he was working with PRS in the late eighties/early nineties.
Gibson evidently got the same idea as well when they filed a lawsuit against PRS on the singlecut which eventually got dismissed, but did cause production to cease on that model for a few years.
Now they even make one with the right scale length. As mentioned by others the pickups are a bit of an acquired taste, and you can get real close to a LP sound by switching them out.
Lots of companies are trying to build a better LP, like it or not PRS are one of them.
![]()
Yes, the singlecuts are obviously influenced by Gibson, but name me a singlecut that isn't? Nobody slags off Collings for making guitars that look similar. Or ESP. PRS are known for the Custom 24, McCarty and derivatives thereof. Those guitars have a unique tone and are clearly not trying to emulate anyone.
Most of the hate, as usual, emanates from jealousy or narrow-mindedness (NB - of course some people dislike them for genuine reasons).
Mo: I have to ask: why a 408? I mean it looks really interesting and is no doubt an incredible instrument, but surely the best starting point with PRS is a classy Custom 24?
-C