strungup":2b209629 said:
Zachman":2b209629 said:
psychodave":2b209629 said:
Like my thread yesterday, I love the HT-5. If I ever used it to play out, I would use my slave w/d/w rig.
At home I still use the Camerons, Marshalls (100 Watt), Boogies 180 Watts and 75 Watts and don't have to crank them to get them to sing -- BUT some guys insist they have to be cranked to sound good. BS, just gotta know what you're doing.
My $.02
one thing to consider. A tube change on a ht-5 vs a tube change on your 100 watt amp. Over years of use your gonna save money. I don't have a ht-5 or similar amp I use my bigger amps since they do lower volumes very well. I am ust stating a reason for why someone might. Maybe for a light easy gig back up also.
While that may be true (unless you crank your non-mv amp to get the sounds these guys are going for-- it certainly would NOT be true-- because doing that will take them through power tubes WAY more often than I will/do). We both know that isn't at the heart of the small watt amp trends. It's because there is a lot ignorance with people thinking you have to have power tube saturation to get nice gain tones, and doing that means a high watt amp will be too loud-- and it just isn't true, when you know how to choose the right amps for the job, or run gear in other than conventional ways such as re-amping and/or running load boxes (which will go through power tubes more often).
You'd be surprised how many times I've heard guys tell me the problem w/ my 180 Watt MKIII Coliseum to get the sounds they want, and when I get it at TV volumes they go into their "Oh I heard....." diatribe, which was just proven false.
Don't get me wrong, I couldn't possibly care less if guys use whatever they want and it happens to be a 1.5 Watt Sears Silvertone. I just shrug at the insistence that it's the "Only way" to get from point A to point Z