"Too Much Evidence" Of Genocide

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bad Brain
  • Start date Start date
Facts don't matter when you have a transcendent cause Floyd. You will ignore the atrocities because you "believe in" Israel. You're basically part of a cult.
 
acceptance said:
Hamas has tunnels and bunkers running under all of Gaza. Apparently this system is potentially hundreds of miles, and deep. That's part of reason the storyline that they are hiding in schools and hospitals is such bullshit.

There is no evidence that they are using "Human shields." That's just a made up justification to indiscriminately bomb everything and everyone in Gaza.

But humor me Floyd, where is evidence "All over"? What "Word of Hamas" am I repeating?
Click to expand...
That they don't use human shields for one thing. :rolleyes:

That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard you say. Even more so than the earth isn't a sphere. And I'm the imbecile ? :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
acceptance said:
Facts don't matter when you have a transcendent cause Floyd. You will ignore the atrocities because you "believe in" Israel. You're basically part of a cult.
Click to expand...
Well, admittedly no random internet douche has made a video to support my "Facts" but....

Dude you are entirely too anti-semitic to take anything you have to say about this seriously. I ain't wasting much of my time on this topic with you bro. I got other stuff to do.
 
Floyd Eye said:
Dude you are entirely too anti-semitic to take anything you have to say about this seriously.
Click to expand...
I haven't really seen him make any anti-semitic statements in here. What did I miss?
 
"There is no evidence that they are using "Human shields." That's just a made up justification to indiscriminately bomb everything and everyone in Gaza."
 
Technically it's not anti-semitic 'though.

His default positions may not support Israel but that hardly qualifies.

Just tryin' ta play devil's advocate here...
 
Floyd Eye said:
That they don't use human shields for one thing. :rolleyes:

That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard you say. Even more so than the earth isn't a sphere. And I'm the imbecile ? :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...
To clarify, I'm not claiming that Hamas has never ever used a human shield. I am saying that there is no evidence that Hamas is using human shields to the degree that could possibly justify Israel's indiscriminate bombing on civilians and civilian infrastructure. Really I don't think Israel is even claiming this. Where are you getting the idea from?
 
VonBonfire said:
I haven't really seen him make any anti-semitic statements in here. What did I miss?
Click to expand...
Thank you. I don't believe I've ever made an antisemitic statement. I don't hate semites, either Jewish or Arab. For that matter I dont hate Israelis. I do think a portion of them are committing an atrocity and should stop.
 
Monkey Man said:
Technically it's not anti-semitic 'though.

His default positions may not support Israel but that hardly qualifies.

Just tryin' ta play devil's advocate here...
Click to expand...
Actually, there has been legislation proposed here in the US to equate anti-zionism with antisemitism. This movement has been lead by whiny gay republicans who are just as eager as democrats to destroy the first amendment and now get their turn to yell "Racist" at people they don't like. It's the most pathetic thing I've ever seen.
 
acceptance said:
Actually, there has been legislation proposed here in the US to equate anti-zionism with antisemitism.
Click to expand...
What's weird is if that happened it would probably be a Jewish guy to face prosecution for it first. I think a lot of Jewish-Israeli people, much like many Americans here, are just fed up with the partisan politics of their respective nations. It's like it's become so hard for people, leaders, to set aside party politics and bandwagoning and just do the right thing. I mean, what makes a leader is someone who leads and all we have is a bunch of corporate stooges running the place, taking their marching orders from greedy corporate heads.
 
acceptance said:
Thank you. I don't believe I've ever made an antisemitic statement. I don't hate semites, either Jewish or Arab. For that matter I dont hate Israelis. I do think a portion of them are committing an atrocity and should stop.
Click to expand...

Kinda hard to claim antisemitism when the people Israel is at war with are Semitic.......and the fact that some scholars admit the Aramaic language more than likely predates modern Hebrew and was probably the most common language spoken in the time of Christ as well as other languages.

Some examples of Semitic languages include:
Arabic, Amharic, Tigrinya, Aramaic, Hebrew, Maltese, and Tigre.




Semitic languages are divided into four geographical groups:
  • Northern peripheral: Includes Akkadian and its dialects
  • Northern central: Includes Canaanite, Ugaritic, Syriac, Hebrew, Moabite, Old Aramaic, Amorite, and Phoenician
  • Southern central: Includes Arabic and Maltese
  • Southern peripheral: Includes South Arabian dialects and the languages of northern Ethiopia
The Semitic languages have a written history of nearly five thousand years. The first Semitic-speaking people to use writing were the Akkadians, Assyrians, Babylonians, and Eblaites. They used the cuneiform script, which was originally developed by the Sumerians around 3500 BC.




Semitic languages are used as official administrative languages in many states in the Middle East and adjacent areas.
 
Last edited:
Well, you know, when you prance around richy, fag college campuses protesting with signs saying "From the river to the sea", it's pretty mother fucking useless to quibble about the semantics.

And no I'm not insinuating that Acceptance has the kinda money or connections to go to Yale or Harvard. :cool:
 
Floyd Eye said:
Well, you know, when you prance around richy, fag college campuses protesting with signs saying "From the river to the sea", it's pretty mother fucking useless to quibble about the semantics.
Click to expand...
Why, because you think it so obviously means that all the Israeli Jews living there should be exterminated?
 
acceptance said:
Why, because you think it so obviously means that all the Israeli Jews living there should be exterminated?
Click to expand...
If you don't understand the origins of the phrase you might not want to comment on it.
 
Floyd Eye said:
If you don't understand the origins of the phrase you might not want to comment on it.
Click to expand...
The origins are unclear. Regardless, the meaning is open to interpretation.

But really, you might want to do a quick wiki search before you go jumping to conclusions:

The precise origins of the phrase are disputed.[17] According to the American historian Robin D. G. Kelley, the phrase "began as a Zionist slogan signifying the boundaries of Eretz Israel."[18] The Israeli-American historian Omer Bartov notes that Zionist usage of such language predates the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948 and began with the Revisionist movement of Zionism led by Ze'ev Jabotinsky, which spoke of establishing a Jewish state in all of Palestine and had a song which includes: "The Jordan has two banks; this one is ours, and the other one too," suggesting a Jewish state extending even beyond the Jordan River.[19] In 1977, the concept appeared in an election manifesto of the Israeli political party Likud, which stated that "between the sea and the Jordan there will be only Israeli sovereignty".[20][21] The current ideology of the Israeli government in 2024 is rooted in Revisionist Zionism, which sought the entire territory of Mandatory Palestine.[22][23]
Click to expand...

 
acceptance said:
The origins are unclear. Regardless, the meaning is open to interpretation.

But really, you might want to do a quick wiki search before you go jumping to conclusions:



Click to expand...

I should have known you’d whip out some ridiculous, irrelevant source. Maybe origin was the wrong word. Common meaning might have been better.

It’s the exact same thing as burning a cross or hanging a noose in a black family’s yard. Certainly nooses weren’t invented to hang blacks, but you whip one out in front of one and there’s no doubt what it means.

You are once again defending the indefensible.

“While its origins are unknown, in the 1960s and 70s it became the signature phrase of the Palestine Liberation Organization to indicate the replacement of the State of Israel with a State of Palestine extending “from the river to the sea,” including the expulsion of Jews who entered the land after 1947. The phrase soon after became a rallying cry for terrorist groups including Hamas, the group responsible for the October 7, 2023 terror attack on Israeli civilians, murdering over 1,200 people and taking over 250 people hostage.”
 
Floyd Eye said:
You are once again defending the indefensible.
Click to expand...
I'm not defending the indefensible. I am pointing out that the origin of the phrase could very well have come from the zionists themselves, further reinforcing the idea that the meaning is open to interpretation, regardless of how it has been used historically. The same kind of thing happened with Trumps "America first" slogan, which was derided as pro Nazi becuase of the historical use by American "Isolationists" who didn't want to get involved in WW2.
 
acceptance said:
I'm not defending the indefensible. I am pointing out that the origin of the phrase could very well have come from the zionists themselves, further reinforcing the idea that the meaning is open to interpretation, regardless of how it has been used historically. The same kind of thing happened with Trumps "America first" slogan, which was derided as pro Nazi becuase of the historical use by American "Isolationists" who didn't want to get involved in WW2.
Click to expand...
It’s not though. It’s exactly the same as hanging a noose on a black guy’s door. It’s like calling someone a fag and then claiming you thought he was a cigarette or a piece of kindling. Quit being ridiculous.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top