To be fair, all their own demos sound a bit dry and lacking "juice" lol
He breaks it down at 4:48 …mix of the Palmer and a 57 on a WGS ET65Yeah that's really true, whatever they are using mic wise it isn't set up to "wow"
He breaks it down at 4:48 …mix of the Palmer and a 57 on a WGS ET65
What's the overall consensus on the Ceriatone's?
Been contemplating a molecular or chupa to build. This might be a better candidate for a different flavor.
the WGS or the 57?Ah, well that certainly explains why I don't like it at all.
the WGS or the 57?![]()
I think they use a WGS ET65 in a number of their clips. It's one of the most gawd awful sound speakers, especially if you put any decent volume through it.Ah, well that certainly explains why I don't like it at all.
I think they use a WGS ET65 in a number of their clips. It's one of the most gawd awful sound speakers, especially if you put any decent volume through it.
Really, any WGS speaker is the last ones you should use if you want to show off how an amp sounds. Just use a V30 and SM57. Everyone knows that as a starting reference.
They're good amps, well built. Most of the circuits are just copies of other amps. Molecular is based on Cameron Atomica, I believe the Chupa is a Jose mod.What's the overall consensus on the Ceriatone's?
Been contemplating a molecular or chupa to build. This might be a better candidate for a different flavor.
They're good amps, well built. Most of the circuits are just copies of other amps. Molecular is based on Cameron Atomica, I believe the Chupa is a Jose mod.