Give dynamite to children to play with. It's just a tool... it harbours no ill will.
if you mix 1% Turd into a glass of milk the turd contaminates the milk ie. you can't expect to give guns to the good population without the turds killing people and misusing them because they are turds.
You can't unmix the turd from the milk to fix the problem... it's contaminated.
So too with people.
The solution would have been never to import the turds and mix them with the milk (that's the root of the problem) however the leftwing traitors in my country have done it and there's no going back unfortunately.
This is one of the most asinine arguments/analogies I've heard on the subject. You've cranked it up to asi-ten.
Give dynamite to children to play with... WTF??? Such a piss-poor analogy. You're acting like the US hands out firearms to toddlers with every kid's meal. This shows you have no damn clue what you're talking about. Blaming firearms for homicides is like blaming the pencil for failing a math test. I've already said it, and it's what you and every other anti-gun person fail to get through your head... It's not the tool, it's the person using it that's the problem. Regulating firearms does nothing to address the root cause. Get rid of firearms and people move to knives; just like in your country. As I said, it's a feelgood fix that does nothing; like grabbing the hose to water plants when the house is on fire.
As for your milk turd analogy... That one misses the mark pretty wide as well; at least the way you're trying to use it in relation to firearms. This implies one individual spoils the entire population. That's not how society works. Just because one shithead uses a firearm in a destructive manner doesn't mean all of a sudden the whole of society will start doing the same thing. You deal with the actions of the individual, not punish the entire population.
A better analogy would be pulling weeds out a flowerbed. Sometimes a few weeds grow. You pull them out. Then to prevent more from popping up you treat soil with weed killer. This is equivalent to dealing with the current criminals then dealing with the root cause so fewer pop up in the future. But your solution would end up being to till up the entire garden and front yard while you're at it. This is just like regulating firearms and everything else down the line.
*EDIT forgot to put this in with the flowerbed analogy. After you till up the entire yard the weeds still come back. But since you've destroyed all the good plants & grass there's nothing left to help choke them out and the weeds take over everything. Just like if you take away firearms from good law abiding citizens you leave no way for them to defend themselves from criminals which leads to no way to help prevent producing criminals in the first place.
I get that the US and Australia has a different culture centered around firearms. We see them more than just a tool. It's also a symbol of our freedom, one of the things that liberated us from and prevents tyranny. Australia being a parliamentary monarchy doesn't have that same connection. That doesn't mean you need to regulate firearms into oblivion. But you know what, it's your country. I'm not going to be as arrogant as you and give you grief about your laws that don't affect me. I'm just gonna shit on you for stupid analogies and asinine opinions.
Speaking of which; when are you gonna suck it up and apply for your septum ring?
Stop pretending you're "right wing." About the only view you hold that could be considered right wing is on immigration and I'd even contest that. Right wing view on immigration is its fine as long as it's done legally, immigrants assimilate into our society (which BTW doesn't mean abandon their heritage), and show loyalty to the country they now reside. You view tends to lean toward you don't want to be around dark people. That's not right wing, that's just racist.
