
Zap
Active member
bonedarrell":xq20z1a6 said:Jimmy R":xq20z1a6 said:chunktone":xq20z1a6 said:Ya, he need's no amp at all! He could just use an acoustic, because tone's in the fingers.Jimmy R":xq20z1a6 said:Proof that tone is in the fingers! No need for 100 watts if I'm only playing in my living room.![]()
My point was that Doug will shred with WHATEVER gear he has in front of him. That is indisputable. It's pointless to have 100 watts if you're only in your dressing room. Clearly, he will need a MUCH larger rig if he's playing a large venue. So to clarify my original answer to the OP, the bigger the venue, the more rigs matter.
You really don't need a bigger rig for bigger venues. Doug could easily put that vox on stage with a mic in front of it.....there is a reason he doesn't. I can assure you it isn't because "he is playing a large venue." Big rigs sound better IMO....bedroom, studio, stages etc.... I haven't seen anybody make the claim that big rigs help you "shred" better?? "Finger tone" is only part of the equation. The clip of Doug shredding on a little vox does not prove that tone is in the fingers.....it only proves that shredding is in the fingers. That tone sounds like crap IMO, but the shredding sounded cool. Smaller amps in the dressing room are for convenience to warm up. I don't think anybody is suggesting that you need a 100w amp in a dressing room.
What I meant is that he will shred and make it sound good with anything he has at his disposal. He could take a tree trunk with rubber bands and make it sing because fantastic playing will always help compensate for the tones of crappy gear. Does great gear improve tone? No doubt!