Fender sues Yamaha now........ Come in, vote and voice your opinions*_*

  • Thread starter Thread starter The~Kid
  • Start date Start date

Has Fender gone to far suing Yamaha and others

  • Yes

    Votes: 22 56.4%
  • No

    Votes: 2 5.1%
  • Don't care

    Votes: 15 38.5%

  • Total voters
    39
The~Kid

The~Kid

Well-known member
What say you Rig Talk and Players 🤔
 
Last edited:
Love you Dano but i really dont give 3 fucks what fender does.

It doesn't concern me nor do i have time for it
 
8 vs 1 is 50/50 in your book?! That says a lot about how you see things in life...
🤔😂
Was it you or @rsm that cast that single No?
I mean true...... Kind of tired and for some reason I sumed up No and Don't Care....


My mistake 😂
 
FMIC has a low probability of winning.

What's right / true doesn't always win. Especially in the courts.

For example, US Constitution 2A is clear, and even states, "shall not be infringed" while it's infringed nearly everywhere including red states, from the Fed level down to the local level, and everywhere in between.

The Bill of Rights, the first 10 amendments, describe our inalienable rights that government can't take, deny, or limit...yet they do, all the time. Because most Americans don't realize, know or care. It's working out great for western Europe as the invasions continue.

Courts have consistently upheld the infringements, denying what's right and true. In the case of FMIC and enforceable ownership of the strat body design, I don't expect the courts to rule accurately on what's right and true.

The courts will continue to allow the Strat body design to be infringed by the copiers, including those who make nearly identical shapes, and confirm it by calling it an S style or T Style, which is attribution to the original design without compensation or permission of the legal owner of the design...they clearly state they are copying but don't name the original to stay in the gray areas of the law.

as long as the majority is happy buying near identical copies of Fender original designs owned by FMIC, while screwing FMIC out of their legal design ownership rights, who cares, right? :thumbsup: Next time the courts rule the opposite way you want on something you actually care about, maybe you 'll care then?
 
1785346574530.png
 
This one seems to be real kind of tricky.



Keep the votes coming.
 
I mean in a sense a "Don't Care" Vote is sort of the same as a No vote....... 🤔
 
Leo sold this shit years ago. Now you have the latest conglomerate stomping their feet like spoiled rich kids..
Fuck'em..
 
Anyways apparently the old CEO went out and this new one came in......


I didn't even know. It was kind of odd that they did what they did and I was for it at first but when they decided to involve Yamaha.... I mean how could do they do that because at that point they really are going up against the world because if they could do that to the Pacifica.... Then the RG is next, then Shecter, then Kramer and then everything and everybody....... WTF is that :dunno:


Then everything is up for grabs, they got too greedy and over extended....... They just didn't know when to stop.

Aside from IMO that not working legally I just don't abide by that..... Its unAmerican.


This new CEO blows and he is completely fucking up Fender. I can't defend this garbage, it's just making a shit storm for no fucking reason and fucking up a good thing and the industry for no reason.


Old CEO

1000000977.jpg



New CEO
1000000978.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
Reactions: Geo
Why does the new Fender CEO look an evil AI reptilian version of SRV 😡
 
FMIC has a low probability of winning.

What's right / true doesn't always win. Especially in the courts.

For example, US Constitution 2A is clear, and even states, "shall not be infringed" while it's infringed nearly everywhere including red states, from the Fed level down to the local level, and everywhere in between.

The Bill of Rights, the first 10 amendments, describe our inalienable rights that government can't take, deny, or limit...yet they do, all the time. Because most Americans don't realize, know or care. It's working out great for western Europe as the invasions continue.

Courts have consistently upheld the infringements, denying what's right and true. In the case of FMIC and enforceable ownership of the strat body design, I don't expect the courts to rule accurately on what's right and true.

The courts will continue to allow the Strat body design to be infringed by the copiers, including those who make nearly identical shapes, and confirm it by calling it an S style or T Style, which is attribution to the original design without compensation or permission of the legal owner of the design...they clearly state they are copying but don't name the original to stay in the gray areas of the law.

as long as the majority is happy buying near identical copies of Fender original designs owned by FMIC, while screwing FMIC out of their legal design ownership rights, who cares, right? :thumbsup: Next time the courts rule the opposite way you want on something you actually care about, maybe you 'll care then?


While, I am torn on the issue, and do recognize that Fender owns the Strat... there is a question that I don't see anyone asking.

The S shape is a fairly ubiquitous design, its almost synonymous to the instrument, much like the shapes of brass instruments, or orchestral instruments, or drums, or pianos. At what point does this grow beyond the Fender Strat and just become a default electric guitar shape?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rsm
Back
Top